A Sector I Really Should Buy

Published in Investing on 9 July 2012

We look at five dirt-cheap FTSE 100 miners.

It's strange the way sectors go in cycles. There's an element of cyclical business in many sectors, but investors know that. So, surely, if all investors had eyes for the long term, they'd factor in the cycles and share prices would not fly upwards in the short term during the inevitable up spells and crash back during the equally inevitable down spells.

But as we know, most institutional investors only have year-end results in mind, and that leads to cycles in the share prices too -- and long-term Fools can benefit from that.

In fact, Motley Fool analysts have been poring over the various sectors of the FTSE to identify the most undervalued prospects right now, and have come up with their "Top Sectors Of 2012" report -- it's free for a limited time, delivered to your email inbox.

Commodities are unwanted

Today, I'm taking a look at one of those sectors myself, as anything connected with commodities and mining seems to be badly out of favour right now. And that sentiment has pushed our big FTSE 100 (UKX) miners down to bargain prices.

Just take a look at this table of the big five, showing two-year highest and lowest closing prices, with today's price, and forward price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios based on current consensus forecasts...

CompanyMarket capHighLowTodayP/E 2012P/E 2013
Anglo American (LSE: AAL)£29bn3,422p1,956p2,069p7.66.7
Antofagasta (LSE: ANTO)£11bn1,634p909p1,097p119.8
BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT)£39bn2,632p1,667p1,829p8.88.6
Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO)£43bn4,712p2,713p3,047p7.26.7
XStrata (LSE: XTA)£25bn1,551p763p813p7.56.3

(Note: BHP Billiton year ends June, others end December)

Why so cheap?

Most of those low points were in October 2011, but the sector has been getting very close again recently. The underlying worry is the state of the world economy, in particularly the Chinese slowdown. It's also currently exacerbated by the forthcoming interim reporting season, which most commentators are very uncertain about -- and if there's one thing the market hates, it's uncertainty. But I think the pessimism is badly misplaced.

But the metals and minerals produced by these miners underpin the entire global economy, and if the valuations in the table were genuinely indicative of the long-term value of world business, then we'd truly have an unholy economic mess to look forward to. Which, of course, we don't, right?

Is Rio Tinto -- one of the world's largest producers of iron ore, aluminium and copper -- correctly valued on a price of just 7 times prospective earnings? That's half of the long term valuation of the FTSE 100, which tends to average around 14.

Or how about Xstrata, one of the globe's biggest suppliers of copper, but also mining large quantities of coal, zinc, lead and nickel? Is that really only worth 7 times earnings? I certainly don't think so.

It's the same with the others. BHP Billiton produces another serious portion of the world's iron ore supply, plus other base metals, coal and petroleum. Anglo American is another iron producer, also supplying manganese, copper, platinum and yet more coal. Then the smallest of them all, Antofagasta, mainly digs up copper.

Even if we made a conservative estimate of a fair long-term P/E valuation of only 10, to allow for cyclical business risk, that would still suggest a target price of around £42 for Rio Tinto, which is 40% up on today's price -- and the implied percentage rise in the others would be similar.

An alternative way to invest?

But what if you don't want to buy miners directly, but still want to invest in a commodities recovery?

You could try something like Anglo Pacific Group (LSE: APF). It's in the mining sector, but doesn't actually do any digging and delving. Instead, it owns a number of mines, extracting coal and various metals, and takes royalties from them. At £280m, it has a lower market cap than the big miners we've looked at, and it's on a prospective P/E of approximately 18.

Another alternative might be to go for exchange-traded funds that specialise in commodities. If that floats your boat, the ETF Securities website has information about funds based on gold, oil, metals and all sorts of commodities.

But whichever way you do it, I reckon there's gold in them there mines!

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available.

Further Motley Fool investment opportunities:

> Alan does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 09 Jul 2012 , 6:13pm

In recent years, mining companies - like tech and telecom in 1999 - have been pouring billions into investment.
One day it will result in huge overcapacity - if we're not already at that point.
A slowdown in China may be all that's needed to cause many mines to become unprofitable because China needs to continue consuming resources as fast as in recent years, just to keep commodity prices relatively constant.
If we use a simplistic example and assume that China builds two new towns per year, and uses ten thousand tons of commodities for each, then if the rate of town construction slows to one town per year, China's need for commodities would drop by half - and presumably prices would too.
Yet the economy would still be growing - just not as fast.
So it doesn't need a recession or apocalypse to drop commodity prices; just a slowdown to more normal growth rates in the BRICS nations would do it.

So perhaps Mr.Market knows something. Perhaps miners are cheap because he knows that in a couple of years time, their profits will have dropped by a third and put the P/E's back to the market median.

For what it's wort though, I think that commodities and commodity companies probably have one more upmove to come during 2012, before such a scenario may play out in 2013-14.

Tykethat 09 Jul 2012 , 7:36pm

Hi Alan,

You could simplify your decision by simply buying Black Rock World Mining IT (BRWM), it holds most of the major miners (I just had to get that in) and the last time I looked the discount to NAV was 12%.

Cheaper dealing, instant mining portfolio.

retire1asap 10 Jul 2012 , 12:42pm

The db x-trackers Stoxx® Europe 600 Basic Resources ETF appears to offer a perfect mining portfolio if you want exposure to the "big five". I haven't gone into ETF's at all before but am very tempted - is there anything particularly negative about going this route?

BHP Billiton plc 23.02%
Rio Tinto plc 15.39%
Anglo American Plc 15.23%
XStrata plc 8.47%
Glencore International plc ORD USD 0.01 5.88%
ArcelorMittal S.A. 5.23%
Randgold Resources Ltd 3.20%
Tenaris S.A. 3.06%
Antofagasta plc 2.50%
UPM-Kymmene Oyj 2.21%

TMFBoing 10 Jul 2012 , 3:08pm

You could simplify your decision by simply buying Black Rock World Mining IT (BRWM), it holds most of the major miners (I just had to get that in) and the last time I looked the discount to NAV was 12%.

Yes, that's a nice idea.

Alan
TMFBoing

ANuvver 10 Jul 2012 , 8:49pm

Recently dropped BLT from my watchlist.

I reckon the whole sector has now become nothing more than a risky timing play on China's property bubble. As F points out, sometimes the market is right, however difficult value hounds may find the siren call to resist.

Of course miners aren't going bust any time soon - we will always build. But the risks of a significant commodity price correction mean that I'll sit out this dance.

Incidentally, comparisons can never be like-for-like, but the travails of the Chinese economy aro its super-expansionary phase might make interesting study for some of the WikiKeynesians that seem to have such sway in Western debate at the moment.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.