The Really Awful June Value Portfolio Update

Published in Investing on 28 June 2012

Stephen Bland's quarterly update on the value portfolio.

Here's my quarterly update on the value portfolio (VP).

 Cost £Value £
Aviva (LSE: AV)56,25737,921
BP (LSE: BP)7,5215,879
Molins (LSE: MLIN)2,2272,419
RBS (LSE: RBS)19,27915,732
Sub-total 61,951
Cash 1
Current value 61,952
Originally invested 60,000
Gain/(Loss) since May 2009 1,952

3.3%

Since my last review in March, dividend cash was received in the quarter amounting to £2,517. As you'd expect, most of this is from FTSE 100 (UKX) stalwart Aviva, although BP and Molins both paid out as well. Today, I have used this to buy a further 1,087 shares in RBS at 231.5p including costs, bringing the average price per share down to 318.5p. Apart from these items, there have been no other changes.

RBS vs Aviva

The reason I added to RBS now with this cash was to take advantage of a spate of recent poor news that has hammered the price. This hapless company has been hit by computer failures, ratings agency downgrades and possibly the wash from the Barclays (LSE: BARC) LIBOR manipulation case. All of which, in my opinion, is just about irrelevant for the underlying merits of the share which make it an asset play, but the lowered price on the back of this adverse sentiment increases its attractions for those prepared to take a longer view.

The addition to RBS reduces the proportion of Aviva a little, which stands now at about 61% of the whole portfolio. But I didn't add to RBS in order to achieve a reduction of Aviva's position or to mollify those nannying critics who bang on frequently about the risks of farm or near-farm betting -- I added to RBS because I saw it as attractive in itself. It is only incidental that this has the side benefit, if you see it as a benefit, of reducing Aviva's big influence here.

I should add, just to annoy the agriculture critics, that I did consider using this dividend money to increase the Aviva stake even further. It was a toss-up between it and RBS. The latter won because, although it is probably the riskier of the two, I see it as having massive upside potential -- though the lack of dividend is a sore point, which is not the case with Aviva. Dividends are important to value investing.

Overall value

The overall value of the VP has fallen a fair bit since March when it was worth £73,658, but now that is down to £61,952 -- a fall of £11,706 or 15.9%. The principal culprit is the heavily overweight Aviva, down £10,111 -- or 21.1% -- although RBS was no mean contributor either, down £3,021 (18.7%) prior to today's further purchase of the share.

In fact, all four current shares are down over the quarter and the only positive news is the receipt of the dividend cash.

So we're seeing an atrocious performance at the moment, and I'm not one to mince words: it is awful. Readers following the series will know of the great volatility of this portfolio, depending very largely as it does for the time being on my two big financials in Aviva and RBS, especially the former. So whatever the performance at any point, it tells us very little about how it will pan out later.

To illustrate this, at the last review in March, the VP was 22.8% up on its £60,000 cost and now that is down to a rise of only 3.3%. When you bet big on just one or a very small number of shares, expect a pretty bumpy ride.

Some may question whether I have lost faith in it given today's lousy showing. The short answer is no. Since I started the VP over three years ago, there have been quite a number of profitable trades of which long-time followers will be aware and these well outweigh the few losers. You can't win them all -- even value sometimes doesn't work out.

The reason for the low value now is that most of the money from these trades, plus all the dividend money which is sizeable, was reinvested in Aviva, and to some extent RBS, but as it happens both are showing substantial losses on their average cost at present. Despite those unrealised losses, the portfolio is still marginally ahead of cost.

I will tell you if and when I lose faith in this. But if you don't have the patience of a corpse and can't ride out the big moves, then you shouldn't be in the value game.

Are you looking to profit as a long-term investor? "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" is the latest Motley Fool guide to help Britain invest. Better. We urge you to read the report today -- while it's still free and available. 

Further investment opportunities:

> Stephen holds shares in Aviva, Barclays, BP and Persimmon.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Olitom 28 Jun 2012 , 12:10pm

"But I didn't add to RBS ... to mollify those nannying critics who bang on frequently about the risks of farm or near-farm betting"

"I should add, just to annoy the agriculture critics..."

Is it just me - or do other people find this style of writing needlessly abrasive and arrogant? Why does Mr Bland always adopt this kind of argumentative style?

Brockasaurus 28 Jun 2012 , 12:35pm

I've got an idea for a regular Fool article based on the performance of a notional portfolio called "The Even-More Value Portfolio", consisting of 763% in Aviva, 229% RBS to avoid irritating the agriculture fans, and net gearing of 892%. Each month I'll update you on what I didn't do with the notional dividends (which will be to buy more Aviva).

chris110772 28 Jun 2012 , 12:42pm

The "nannying" critics annoy me more

Jonniegul 28 Jun 2012 , 12:49pm

Hi Olitom,

"Is it just me - or do other people find this style of writing needlessly abrasive and arrogant? Why does Mr Bland always adopt this kind of argumentative style?"

I find it highly amusing! That's not to say it is just you of course...
Each to their own, I guess.

TempleM 28 Jun 2012 , 1:31pm

I too find his style amusing. The near farm betting on the other hand I find amusing and audacious.

LastChip 28 Jun 2012 , 2:05pm

I wouldn't worry too much about the style of writing, I'd be much more concerned about Aviva's 0.22 cover of the yield at the time of writing this. Coupled with a decreasing turnover (past 4 years) and a decreasing profit (last 3 years), it's probably only worth a fraction of what it's valued at now.

As I see it, this is purely a bet on whether Aviva will turn things around; or not.

I have to admit to being tempted, but have decided to pass. If Aviva is forced to cut the dividend, where will that send the share price? It's hard to say. If the market considers it's already in the price, then it could actually lead to an upward trend. Alternatively, if the markets already in a downward trajectory, I suspect even a lower price. We'll see, but my glass is (for the moment) definitely half empty.

theRealGrinch 28 Jun 2012 , 3:24pm

a piddly poor performance at present.

lootman 28 Jun 2012 , 3:59pm

Stephen,

It would be helpful if you could always give the return in the FTSE-100 over the comparable time period in these reprots, so we can easily see how your portfolio is faring versus a benchmark it is presumably hoping to beat.

jrr773 28 Jun 2012 , 4:04pm

Olitom - no you are most certainly not alone. Brockasaurus - you could market your idea as the Magic Bean Fund. Judging by the number of fans of Mr Bland's articles you should make a packet. They might not be so lucky.

Mari11ion 28 Jun 2012 , 6:11pm

RBS closed at 206.4p today. That's an 11% loss in one day. Good Call ;-)

MunroMan 28 Jun 2012 , 7:02pm

Loot, if he did that he would have to pay FTSE.

jaizan 28 Jun 2012 , 7:13pm

This should be classified as a "Highly Speculative Portfolio" rather than a value portfolio.
Certainly this share selection would be highly inappropriate as a core holding for most people.

MAACPRIME 28 Jun 2012 , 8:15pm

"If Aviva is forced to cut the dividend, where will that send the share price? It's hard to say. If the market considers it's already in the price, then it could actually lead to an upward trend. Alternatively, if the markets already in a downward trajectory, I suspect even a lower price. "

The price will drop like a stone. I'm guessing a lot of institutional and private investors are holding this mostly for the divi.

I don't doubt this portfolio will make money over time but I'd be pretty surprised if it beat the index within the next five to seven years.

Value investing works best when shares are bought at the point of maximum pessimism. Aviva's and RBS' shares were purchased too early.

fartarse2 28 Jun 2012 , 9:40pm

People don't half get wound up.
Keep up the good work Stephen.

ANuvver 28 Jun 2012 , 10:02pm

AV's an interesting one, isn't it. I reckon it's being bid down precisely because a lot of people see a dividend cut coming.

Cruel result too, to chase RBS down and get an immediate one-day thumping like that.

I don't think it was the author's intention, but some of his remarks reminded me of the dangers of averaging down with the intention of making your percentages look better!

lootman 28 Jun 2012 , 10:19pm

ANuvver,

Yes, it's called a "Value Trap".

With a value trap, an investor who focuses only on the numbers, and not on what is happening out there in the real world, becomes convinced that there will be a reversion to the historic mean.

The more the share continues to fall, the better the "numbers" look, and the more convinced the ill-fated investor becomes that he's getting a bargain, pouring ever more funds into it.

Doubling down on a loser is one of the most reliable ways of losing a fortune. I can see having a punt on RBS or AV, but 80% of a portfolio? Insanity, because their fate rests ultimately on macro factors that can neither be predicted nor controlled.

This portfolio is showing a capital loss over the last 3 years, once dividends are excluded, while the index is up 30% plus. Losing 10% per annum in relative terms is not flattering.

ANuvver 28 Jun 2012 , 11:07pm

Indeed. I made reference recently in another post to the zeitgeist unsustainable 7% yield in sovereigns and suggested that it might make a useful yardstick for equities.

As I understand it, this value portfolio was established as a paper exercise, a thought experiment from which we can all learn lessons. God help anyone who shadowed it.

And as you may have intuited from my remarks, I don't believe in chasing losers down either.

I do have a position in AV, and it's the worst dog in my stable, which at current levels will take three years to pay me back the price of entry. Thankfully, it's the only financial in my bag and the whole lot is doing rather nicely. So far, so good. And I don't mind holding a huge insurer as part of a broader scheme.

jackdaww 29 Jun 2012 , 8:51am

olitom

Is it just me - or do other people find this style of writing needlessly abrasive and arrogant? Why does Mr Bland always adopt this kind of argumentative style?

keeps him in a job.

kiffberet 29 Jun 2012 , 9:56am

I bought AV shares through a sharesave scheme when i worked for them, and this was at a reduced price of 400p. I laughed when a collegue sold his entire lot when the scheme matured at 750p and the price rocketed to 850p. I still have my shares, and he's laughing now...

However, I do have (some) faith in AV, and I don't believe this a falling knife. The company is massive and produces tons of money. It's only the sentiment of the Eurozone, and the recession we're in that is reducing the earnings, not a fundamental problem with the business. And with Solvency II, all the insurers will be stronger, although maybe less profitable, but still good businesses.

Fingers crossed they don't have any fraudulent activites hiding in the closet!!

lookingforclues 29 Jun 2012 , 11:30am

"Is it just me - or do other people find this style of writing needlessly abrasive and arrogant? Why does Mr Bland always adopt this kind of argumentative style?"

Probably because he believes his own press. His ego has been fueled by an army of doting fans that rec anything he posts. If his style was instead a reflection of documented performance then I'm sure it would be a lot more humble.

Some of his comments in the face of the VP's relative performance are borderline farcical. If I didn't know better (?) I'd think the above article was more wind-up than serious investment stance.

lfc (a nannying critic).

lootman 29 Jun 2012 , 3:02pm

LFC,

Yes, it's fine for the ethos of TMF to be to distrust the "Wise" and advocate a DIY approach. But that also creates a vacuum which leaves room for self-styled guru's and pundit's to create a cultish following here without any formal credentials and qualifications to warrant it.

For all the criticisms of the "Wise", if you work professionally in the field of finance and investing (and I used to), there is a rigour and a discipline imposed on you. Anyone who walked into an investment meeting at a fund manager and spoke or presented in the way that Bland does here would be thrown out, both on grounds of attitude and content.

So as much as I love TMF, one must retain a healthy pinch of salt with which to apply to amateur prognostications dressed up as universal truth. And if a TMF guru or strategy has no profile outside of TMF, that's a warning sign that it might be of limited real-world validity. Investing based purely on what a talking head here says could be a one-way trip to the poorhouse.

Fittster 29 Jun 2012 , 3:51pm

if you work professionally in the field of finance and investing (and I used to), there is a rigour and a discipline imposed on you."

Pull the other one.

Back2Value 30 Jun 2012 , 1:50am

The most important thing about this column is that it makes you THINK. I don't agree with everything that Pyad says, but he's a man who knows his own mind and isn't afraid to take a position, nor to defend it robustly.

I've learned a lot, and p.y.a.d. (especially 'd' - debt) is a core set of principles to use when assessing investments.

Keep sticking it to 'em...

B2V

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.