How To Build An Income Portfolio

Published in Investing on 21 June 2012

A five-step plan for the novice investor. What's stopping you?

Many investors -- including me -- invest with an eye on building an income stream. Sure, hefty capital gains are welcome as well, but it's no longer a primary concern. What matters is that income.

That said, you only have to look at the weekend money pages to see that an awful lot of people are going to be disappointed. The real, inflation-adjusted, rates of return from many of the fixed-rate accounts on offer, for instance, are either negative or barely positive.

Which is why, of course, a lot of people are turning to shares -- either directly, or indirectly, via funds.

Do it yourself

A retired pal of mine, for instance, is getting a very decent return from a selection of equity income funds held at one of the leading fund supermarkets. Paying a monthly or quarterly income, they supplement his pension and part-time work very nicely indeed.

But funds have a downside: the charges. A total expense ratio (TER) of 1.5% or so, in short, is quite a lot to pay for the privilege of owning stakes in boring but high-yielding blue chips such as GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK), British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS), Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) or AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN).

Which begs an obvious question: why not cut out the middle man, so to speak, and hold the shares directly in your own income-paying portfolio?

It's perfectly possible, and many of our readers do just that -- check out the stalwarts on our High Yield Portfolio discussion board, for instance.

That said, novice investors can find the process perplexing at times. So here are the major points to watch out for -- in a handy five-point plan.

Here's how

  • Size matters. Aim for large, blue-chip businesses. Why? Because their size gives them resilience to withstand sudden shocks, and adverse economic conditions. Look no further than BP (LSE: BP) and the Gulf of Mexico disaster, which would have sunk a smaller company.
  • Diversify. Just as importantly, spread your risks -- don't make the mistake of an over-reliance on a single company or sector. The credit crunch, for instance, found some investors with holdings in Northern Rock, Bradford & Bingley, Lloyds TSB (LSE: LLOY) and Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS). Whoops.
  • Aim for above-average yields. It's an income strategy, so dividend yields matter. Today, the FTSE 100 (UKX) is yielding 3.8%, so you're looking for yields comfortably over that. In simple terms, that means going for BAE Systems (LSE: BA) on a yield of 7.3%, rather than Rolls-Royce (LSE: RR) on a yield of 2.7%.
  • Go for quality. These are shares for the long term. Go for businesses with low borrowings, good dividend cover (the ratio of earnings to dividends paid), and a good year-on-year history of growing those dividends. In addition to many of the shares listed above, IMI (LSE: IMI) and Sage Group (LSE: SGE) amply meet these requirements, and offer a forecast yield of 4.5% or so.
  • Avoid the yield trap. A strategy of ranking shares in order of yield will throw up some juicy-looking potential bargains. But the key word there is 'potential'. Some yields, in short, are probably too good to be true, with a dividend cut -- or worse -- lurking over the horizon. Halfords (LSE: HFD), presently on a forecast yield of 9.1% falls into that category, for instance. Resolution (LSE: RSL) is another. They might be fine -- but why take the risk? There are plenty of other decent picks out there.

Getting started

So there we have it: a five-point guide to building an income portfolio.

I haven't done the sums recently, but I'd be surprised if you couldn't put together a reasonably diversified portfolio, using the guidelines above, that would deliver a yield of 5% or so -- roughly 10 times Bank Rate, in other words.

That said, many novice investors fall at the first hurdle: the basics of buying shares in the first place. Here, a free Motley Fool special report -- "What Every New Investor Needs To Know" -- might just help. As I say, it's free, so what have you got to lose by downloading a copy?

And if you'd like to know the sort of shares that investment superstar Neil Woodford -- who manages a whopping £20 billion of income portfolios -- thinks are decent picks, then another free Motley Fool report can also help: "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor".

And incidentally, those with an eye on capital gains might be interested in the fact that this stellar income investor actually turned in a gain of 347% over the 15 years to 31 December 2011, versus the FTSE All-Share's 42% return -- another illustration of the power of dividends. Simply click here to download a copy, free of charge.

Investing is by no means easy in today's uncertain economy. That's why we've published "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- our guide to three favourable industries. This free report will be dispatched immediately to your inbox.

> Malcolm holds GlaxoSmithKline, Reckitt Benckiser, AstraZeneca, BP, Lloyds, BAE Systems and Rolls-Royce. He does not hold shares in any other companies listed above. The Motley Fool owns shares in Halfords.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

rockrat32 21 Jun 2012 , 7:38pm

Beware the Halfords yield trap, you say, maybe you guys should speak with one another as the paid for MF service share advisor recently recommended this
Wonder what they think about it

MDW1954 21 Jun 2012 , 10:42pm

Hello rockrat32,

I speak with Fool HQ several times a week, typically. Most recently in connection with this very piece.

I don't think that anything I've written contradicts James Early's most recent guidance, on June 6th, but feel free to raise it on the watercooler over there, by all means.

Certainly, yields of 9% or so should warrant careful evaluation, wouldn't you agree?

Malcolm (author)

ANuvver 22 Jun 2012 , 1:48am

The sovereign markets seem to think in terms of 7% being an unsustainable yield. With markets so lock-stepped at the moment, perhaps 7% is a useful yardstick to apply to income equities.

It does seem possible to scoop up relatively robust income equity yields on cost around the 4-6% level these days, but much above that might be too greedy.

Never forget, with big hyperscrutinised companies such as these, the market is pricing in significant risks to earnings, at least in the short term. Personally, I think it's a risk worth running, but be aware.

Bear in mind also that a boring company on a wimpy sub-1% yield can grow to 10% yield on cost in 20 years, while the equity value grows by a factor of 12 (that's a fag-packet approximation of Buffet's Coke habit, btw).

MDW1954 22 Jun 2012 , 12:14pm

Couldn't agree more, ANuvver.

Malcolm (author)

Basia02 22 Jun 2012 , 2:03pm

I started doing this specifically 7 years ago but realised there were some share unit trusts yielding more than the shares I was buying, I therefore moved to buying these.
Whilst I continue to buy income shares I try to buy on the dips and pocket any small gains where I can. However I am buying not just for the income, but because I think the share is under valued as well.

jongleur100 22 Jun 2012 , 6:05pm

I'm not sure I agree about RR and BAE. RR has put on 46% growth in one year, 166% in five years. BAE has put on 7.1% in the past year, -0.38% in the past three.
Capital growth may not be the aim, but surely creating a large sum of extra capital to turn into future income opportunities should not be sneezed at, as a strategy? Eeven in the short term, if you were to impatiently peel off an extra 4.6% of capital gains off your RR investment per year (in an ISA) you'd have your 7.3% income without much of a dent in the capital.
How many more years of underperformance from BAE (pension deficit, EPS negative growth) are we going to put up with before its income starts to look like a consolation prize?

jongleur100 22 Jun 2012 , 6:36pm

Apols for typo - RR has put on 166% in three (not five) years.
Btw, I'm not suggesting RR is a strong buy right now (though it would if the sp came down to 800 or so). Or that BAE is a sell. But I like to hold a range of growth/income shares/ITs/ETFs bearing in mind that inflation may erode the value of income over time. So as well as high income-bearers - with options for taking income or reinvestment of dividends - a handful of strong growth shares with modest yields are perfect for an ISA. To take a 250% capital gain without giving a thought to the taxman is a nice feeling.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.