Bad News For FTSE Fat Cats

Published in Investing on 20 June 2012

New laws should spell the end of cosy pay deals.

When Sir Martin Sorrell, chief executive of international ad agency WPP (LSE: WPP), had his £6.8m pay package overwhelmingly rejected by shareholders at last week's AGM, was it thrown out?

No, because in an appalling injustice, shareholders in UK listed companies don't actually get any say on how much they pay the people who work for them -- any vote is advisory, and executive fat cats can still decide for themselves how much to take to line their own pockets.

But that is all going to change, as Business Secretary Vince Cable is set to announce the introduction of mandatory pay votes.

They're our millions!

As shareholders, we we should be concentrating on trying to make our own millions rather than being forced to hand them out to underserving bosses. And if you don't think that's really possible, have a look at the Motley Fool's free report "10 Steps To Making A Million In The Market" -- it just might surprise you. So this news has to be good for us.

The plan will see companies listed on the FTSE 100 (UKX), and on the LSE's other indexes, being forced to hold a shareholder vote on executive pay every three years. Once decided, remuneration packages must be adhered to for the next three years, or else a new vote must be called.

Companies must also publish a simple annual statement of executive pay, unlike many who issue near-impenetrable remuneration reports that make things anything but clear.

Shareholders are revolting!

It's taken a long time, and a number of shareholder revolts, for this to come about.

Only last month, FTSE 100 insurer Aviva (LSE: AV) lost a similar executive pay vote at its AGM, and in that case chief executive Andrew Moss did the honourable thing and stepped down.

Other companies have seen rebellions without actually losing their vote. Barclays (LSE: BARC) notably saw more than 30% of of its shareholders failing to support its pay package in April, with protestors gathering outside its AGM to highlight big executive pay awards while the share price is dwindling.

Bookmaker William Hill (LSE: WMH) also came close to serious embarrassment last month, when almost half of its shareholders rejected its plans for a £1.2m bonus for boss Ralph Topping, which was not linked to his performance.

There have also been revolts at miner Xstrata (LSE: XTA), which has seen its share price slide, and at struggling Premier Foods (LSE: PFD), whose shares are down more than 60% in the last 12 months.

And shareholder discontent at Trinity Mirror (LSE: TNI) finally forced out deeply unpopular boss Sly Bailey, after her pay had soared while the shares tumbled 90%.

The answer to our problems?

So will the new rules put an end to all of this? Well, there will still be shareholder discontent from time to time, but we will finally have the power to do something about it rather than having to sit back and be fleeced.

Some will be disappointed by the three-year cycle, and would prefer such a vote every year, but it may be good to start with a longer-term perspective and minimise knee-jerk actions. And at least top bosses will finally be accountable to those who pay their wages.

David Kuo challenged his Motley Fool analysts to pinpoint the attractive sectors of 2012 -- and they delivered! Discover the industries they selected in this new Motley Fool guide -- "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- while it's still free!

Further investment opportunities:

> Alan Oscroft does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

LastChip 20 Jun 2012 , 12:02pm

Strange this article should appear right now. Around 10 minutes ago, a Nationwide voting pack dropped through my letterbox naturally urging I should support the board and their recommended acceptance of the proposals, including their remuneration report, naturally.

I'll make no bones about it. I'm sick of hearing excuses about bank rates and non-existent interest rates for so long, so I've rejected every proposal on block.

You could ask; why?

As far as I'm concerned, there's no fully independent directors. They've all been nominated at some point or another to join the board. They're all in it together and no ones going to rock the boat.

I'd urge all other Fools receiving these packs to consider their position too. If you want change, now's the time to stand up and be counted. A few more bloody noses won't do any harm at all and maybe the directors will finally get the message; we've had enough.

tru2me 20 Jun 2012 , 3:38pm

LastChip am also a Nationwide member.
So I take your point.

Alan thanks for possibly. the most positive outcome for UK listed shareholders in 2012.
As you say it is a start.

You said,
"The plan will see companies listed on the FTSE 100 (UKX), and on the LSE's other indexes, being forced to hold a shareholder vote on executive pay every three years."
Does that include LSE listed AIM shares?

And has Vince Cable considered the fact that some shares are listed on other international indices as well as here on the LSE so only UK shareholders would be voting?

snoekie 20 Jun 2012 , 4:17pm

Agreed LastChip. I routinely vote against the pay and bonus packages, and have for the last few years, because the directors have over remunerated themselves, over the last ten years, particularly the last 4 or 5, for p1ss poor, even negative, results.

In this I include the Lonrho remuneration package, where the CEO upped his pay package by 50%, which is most of the first profit made by the company to March this year, for the last 14 years, on the promise of bigger returns for the current year and henceforth.

I doubt he will undo his package if the company doesn't improve this year because of the the drama now unfolding.

TMFBoing 20 Jun 2012 , 7:34pm

You said,
"The plan will see companies listed on the FTSE 100 (UKX), and on the LSE's other indexes, being forced to hold a shareholder vote on executive pay every three years."
Does that include LSE listed AIM shares?


I haven't been able to find full details yet, but so far I've heard nothing to suggest it won't be all UK-listed companies.

Foolish best,
Alan
TMFBoing

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.