The world's largest gold miner sends a proven leader packing.
A version of this article originally appeared on our US site, Fool.com.
The world's largest gold producer tried to offer up a human sacrifice to the market gods last week by abruptly canning its CEO, Aaron Regent. I think Barrick Gold (NYSE: ABX.US) has made a confounding and unwarranted move here, and I'm eager to tell you why.
I've been following Regent's career for nearly a decade, reaping profits along the way. I had the very good fortune to hold shares of base-metal miner Falconbridge (where Regent served as president and CEO from 2002 to 2005) before the merger with Noranda in 2005 and the subsequent C$27 billion acquisition by Swiss miner XSTRATA in 2006. Regent had served as CFO at Noranda years earlier, and in my view his connection with both companies played a key role in achieving that landmark pairing.
Regent then returned to his long-standing roots with Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM.US) as a senior managing partner, and he served as co-CEO of Brookfield Infrastructure Partners (NYSE: BIP.US) as that well-respected dividend payer branched out as a spin-off in early 2008.
Now, let's take a moment to consider what Regent inherited from Barrick's founder and then-acting-CEO Peter Munk when Regent took the reins as president and CEO in January 2009. Barrick Gold was suffocating beneath the weight of a disastrous and highly controversial portfolio of gold hedges that presented a monumental liability in the face of gold's secular bull market. Properly recognizing that gold would continue to run, Regent took decisive steps to clear that hedge book by taking a painful $5.6 billion writedown and raising $3 billion to cancel remaining hedges.
When I discovered this morning that Barrick had thrown Regent under the bus by ousting him from the top spot, I perceived a lame attempt by Barrick's board to offer the market a scapegoat for the less-than-stellar trailing price action in the stock. Reuters pointed out Wednesday morning that Barrick's stock on the Toronto exchange had risen only 3.8% since its close on the day before Regent began his stint as CEO.
I'll admit that came as a surprise to me. I suppose perceptions of that trailing performance could vary based upon one's vantage point, since U.S. investors accessing Barrick on the NYSE have seen a 30% advance (adjusted for dividends) over the corresponding period from Jan. 15, 2009, through Tuesday's preannouncement close. Barrick's stock performance on the NYSE has indeed lagged that of the benchmark Market Vectors Gold Miners Index ETF (NYSE: GDX.US) over the period in question. But over a period that has dealt the industry its share of hard knocks, it is hardly the standout underperformer.
As the world's largest producer, Barrick has suffered more than most the consequences of its own existing massive scale. Barrick-sized gold projects are increasingly hard to find, and Barrick has certainly been a poster child for victims of skyrocketing capital costs for mine construction. The company's $7.7 billion move into copper with last year's acquisition of Equinox Minerals has drawn vocal criticism, and perhaps this personnel change signals a dampening enthusiasm internally for that deal. Short of becoming a fly on the boardroom wall, we can only speculate as to the rationale.
I can say that Aaron Regent has distinguished himself with a golden record of effective management and meaningful value generation, and unless someone can convince me otherwise, I think Barrick just divested one of its more valuable assets.
I wish incoming Barrick CEO Jamie Sokalski a longer and more secure tenure than that of his ousted predecessor.
> Where is the UK's leading dividend stock-picker investing today? The identities of Neil Woodford's favourite blue chips are revealed in this free Motley Fool report -- "8 Shares Held By Britain's Super Investor".
