'Austerity' Is A Big Con

Published in Investing on 21 May 2012

The UK's total annual public spending is £22 billion more than in 2008.

"And if all others accepted the lie which the Party imposed -- if all records told the same tale -- then the lie passed into history and became truth" -- George Orwell, 1984

Austerity is the word of the moment, but last week the inter-dealer broker Tullett Prebon (LSE: TLPR) cast doubt upon Britain's austerity programme by claiming that it is nothing more than "a spin job" that is designed to deceive the markets, and that the government's claim that public spending has been cut is "bare-faced deception".

Tullett Prebon is right. Despite the huge amount of wailing and gnashing of teeth by special interest groups over "savage cuts", the figures state that the total annual public spending in Britain is £22 billion more than in 2008, and much of this has come from taking on even more debt.

While there have been substantial cuts to some spending programmes -- most notably defence, where we apparently still have enough money to build two aircraft carriers but not to buy the aircraft to put upon them -- the state continues to be addicted to increasing public spending.

You can't handle the truth!

Tullett Prebon's boss Terry Smith, best-known in Foolish circles as the author of Accounting For Growth, appeared on BBC's Newsnight last Wednesday to discuss the spending cuts. Smith demolished the panel's arguments by quoting the government's official figures, which show that spending has grown since 2008.

You can see this debate on the BBC iPlayer. It is nine minutes long, starting at 23 minutes into the programme with Smith being first brought into the discussion by Jeremy Paxman at just over 26 minutes. As this was broadcast on 16 May it will be removed by 24 May, if not sooner, as per BBC policy.

The problem with democracies

In a democracy, groups of voters are incentivised to vote for political parties who promise to give them free stuff, which they will pay for by taxing someone else. George Bernard Shaw warned us of this when he said: "The government who robs Peter to pay Paul can always depend on the support of Paul"; but nowadays most political parties see this as a manifesto commitment rather than as a warning.

Since governments generally can't raise enough in taxes to meet their spending promises, they end up borrowing the difference and these accumulated budget deficits eventually create a national debt that is so hard to service that it becomes a drag upon economic growth.

Whenever any government spending is cut, the benefits (lower taxes) are widely dispersed while the detriments (less money spent on one group of people) is concentrated among a much smaller number of producers and other beneficiaries. They make lots of noise about the cuts and, since protesters make for much more interesting media coverage, they get the lion's share of the attention.

Please lie to us and spin everything

It's not exactly a state secret that politicians are prone to telling lies and half-truths, but in the last few decades they have turned it into an art form. They're encouraged to do this by the large number of voters who don't want to consider unpalatable alternatives, such as the fact that there is no "magical money tree" where resources can be conjured out of nowhere or that the world doesn't owe any of us a living.

Britain is also still coming to terms with a coalition government where mixed messages emerge on a regular basis. This is because the Conservatives and Liberal Democrats are both trying to spin the news to try and ensure they appear in the best possible light, while the other side gets all of the blame for unpopular policy decisions.

If you've ever seen the Danish television series Borgen, you have a head start when it comes to understanding the politics inside a coalition government. The show focuses upon a newly elected Prime Minister who discovers that holding together a coalition of several parties is about as easy as herding cats. Naturally, one of the most important characters in the show is her personal spin doctor!

The investment angle

Eventually, if the deficit isn't reduced dramatically then the bond market will take control and impose massive public spending cuts by demanding higher yields on gilts (British government debt). Thankfully, the average gilt matures in about 14 years, so we aren't under the same pressure as countries like Italy whose national debt has a much shorter maturity and is thus coming under more pressure to balance its books.

But as we've seen in the last few years, through the Bank of England's quantitative easing programmes the current and previous governments have deliberately stoked inflation in order to devalue the national debt. This doesn't exactly bode well for cash deposits or fixed-interest bonds, which is why I've been stocking up on National Savings Index-Linked certificates, which unfortunately aren't on sale at the moment.

To reduce my exposure to Britain, nowadays I tend to invest in foreign companies and British companies that have large overseas interests, such as Diageo (LSE: DGE) and Unilever (LSE: ULVR), two excellent examples of British companies that do most of their business overseas.

A company that does the vast majority of its business in Britain has to be quite special in order to tempt me to buy its shares. Two such companies are reporting this Wednesday, when I'll be taking a closer look at their results.

Investing is by no means easy in today's uncertain economy. That's why we've published "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- our guide to three favourable industries. This free report will be dispatched immediately to your inbox.

Our recommended articles for today:

20 Giants For A 6% Dividend Yield
The FTSE 100 fell every day last week as the eurozone crisis deepened. However, these choppy market conditions now provide some potentially attractive income opportunities. Cliff D'Arcy lists 20 shares to consider.

A Millionaire Investor's Small-Cap Portfolio
When a very successful private investor discloses the details of his small-cap portfolio, it's always worth taking note. David Holding recaps the shares held by Roy Mitchell.

> Tony owns shares in Diageo and Unilever, as well as several issues of National Savings index-linked certificates. Unilever is a Motley Fool Share Advisor recommendation.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

blackwhite 21 May 2012 , 11:01am

Two such companies are reporting this Wednesday, when I'll be taking a closer look at their results

Could you not have at least named those two companies?

alsirat 21 May 2012 , 11:05am

Emm is the £22 billion of extra Government expenditure a real terms increase or a cash only increase? If it is cash then there has been a cut in public expenditure because of the effects of inflation. I think the article needs to be clearer as to the basis of the calculation. If cash you should also have a go at rebasing public expenditure in 2008 to 2012 inflation adjusted figures and make the comparison with todays actual government expenditure. We could see whether there has been a real cut or not. May be this is what Tullett Prebon did but it is not clear and leads to a big question mark over their analysis. Can you clarify?

Wuffle 21 May 2012 , 11:17am

Tony,

Yes, Newsnight is an intellectual joy in a sea of talent show cr*p isn't it.
The next few years will be all about smart positioning. Most will lose, a few will gain. Worse odds than in the past but not impossible.

Wuffle.

TonyTwoTimes 21 May 2012 , 12:59pm

Hi blackwhite,

Unfortunately our disclosure rules prevent me from mentioning these companies today, but not in an article to be published this Wednesday coming (the 23rd), as I bought a few more in one of them last week.

Hi alsirat,

I went with the Tullett Prebon figures, which in turn were based on the government's own figures, as published in The Daily Telegraph (print version).

These are not adjusted for inflation. The point behind them and which underpins Tullett Prebon's argument is that despite claims to the contrary public spending in nominal terms has gone up and the "cuts" simply haven't been delivered upon.

Hi Wuffle,

Yes, Newsnight is good stuff and it really stands out.

It's one of the few things I watch on the BBC ("Mrs. Brown's Boys" being the other main one but that's another story!)

Cheers,

TonyL (the author)

mcturra2000 21 May 2012 , 1:53pm

Yip. You got it alright.

There seems to be a lot of public sector makework, with employees that have copper-bottomed pensions, backed by strong unions. That is one source of a never-ending drain on productive capital.

Another one is the never-ending stimuli by governments. This leads to malinvestment of resources, and ratchets up the debt further.

The cure is a programme of austerity - which will require great pain - and will only happen when all other options are exhausted.

I'm slowly learning about the Austrian Business Cycle. Very enlightening. Look and learn:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5K4Os5eXPw4

4spiel 21 May 2012 , 3:44pm

It is not said where the extra spending is going. Housing Benefit.? Why does the Government pay the mortgages in effect of Buy to Let landlords ? High rents are only high because the state is keeping them up and keeping up house prices at levels first time buyers can only afford them at interest rates that give savers a pittance ! This is why we have immigrants doing the jobs going and our own people sitting at home priced out of workand some immigrants too with 4 wives in 4 houses all on benefit. But the £ is better Sir Merv is going easier on QE and the euro is weak. Time to cut the cost of Housing Benefit . companies need to cut their costs to the bone to sell here and abroad and limit pay rises to merit. National minimum wage -cut it in half. Dividends -there needs to be restraint -companies must invest to perform better in new tecnology to cut costs and train in better skills to compete with a stronger £. A strong £ makes our essential raw materials cheaper and reduces costs -that is why the Germans are strong. they joined the euro with a high Dmark and they took the medicine !

longpod 21 May 2012 , 6:40pm

The individuals in a government responsible for overspending should be fined.

Unfortunately, they are the ones who would need to pass a law to make this happen, so fat chance!

ANuvver 22 May 2012 , 3:33am

Well, the coalition really did get a hospital pass.

Fiscal restraint is absolutely essential, and the opposition has the luxury of making the compassionate case. All of a sudden, every cabbie is an expert on Keynes...

The whole thing is so depressingly reminiscent of the early 70s. Osborne seems determined not to do a Barber, but Balls one feels would be quite happy to do a Healey (Mk1 at least).

I find myself grateful that we have government that is prepared to take a necessary, yet thoroughly unpopular stance, at least for now. Labour - now where did they get the idea from, I wonder - are attempting a dialectical manouevre on the polarised issues of austerity and growth. I question whether the opposition really understands the power of bond markets - oddly, considering the shadow chancellor's brother is a leading light at PIMCO.

A perverse irony indeed that the "posh boys" are being battered to great political advantage by the "twin-Eded monster" for savage inhuman cuts when what they're actually doing is desperately trying to slow growth in spending and attempting to utilise the UK's key remaining strength of a truly sovereign currency by trying to be seen as hard men who will not blink.

A propos the investment premise, I agree. Massive home-based companies with global reach, and hopefully increasing global reach. And sterling is quite possibly about to have its best summer for a long time, relatively speaking, albeit for ghastly reasons.




4spiel 22 May 2012 , 12:22pm

Yes the sterling has steadied but no thanks to Osborne or Cameron or the BOE. And now the IMF lady suggests sterling weakening.What an unelcome 'nursemaid is Christine Lagarde. If only Axel Weber ! The EDs are a recipe for diosater but the Tory Govt we have has little clue either and leans on Socialist leaning international bureaucrats for support rather than help businesses to get fitter and leaner and more competitive and investing more. Nothing tough about thistory Government either -they just hit the weakest affected by years of Labour government and a feeble coalition. .

matchmade 22 May 2012 , 1:19pm

4spiel: if housing benefit rates are cut further (on top of recent changes restricting tenants to the bottom 30% of rents in each area and single people under the age of 35 to single rooms in houseshares), and landlords choose to stop letting to benefit claimants, where do you propose the now-homeless benefit claimants live? The National Landlords Association is already reporting that most landlords are leaving the housing benefit market because they know they can let to private tenants at better rent levels. Because councils and national government are not building many new social houses, but place most of the burden on private housebuilders in the form of "affordable homes", the private rental market is the only sector available in which to house benefit claimants.

I would also contest your claim that private sector rents are "high": gross returns for landlords average just 6%, which after tax, mortgages and all the regulation costs like gas inspections is much less than a landlord could get by simply investing in Vodafone, say, for the dividends. The landlord also has to bear all the risk of falling house prices, which can easily wipe out the small profits that landlords make on rental income. Arguably rents are actually too low, which is why large institutional investors do not invest in residential property for rent: the returns are simply not enough to justify all the cost of maintaining property and the risk of rogue tenants inflicting damage, not paying rent, and all the other things they get up to (unlike tenants of commercial property, who tend to behave themselves).

4spiel 22 May 2012 , 2:09pm

Yes indeed -a very good - ad for BLND SLI and maybe SREI ! Private small landlords can have a horrendous time particularly when the local housing benefit office laughs at them when they have paid the tenant but the tenant does not pay them. Not only that threatens to prosecute them for breach of confidentiality. I know of such a landlord. This lady would have done well to have simply lived off her good work pension whilst having fairly cheap mortgages the worry just not worth it. Indeed why is public money being so misused in this kind of finance to me beggars belief. Yes rent rooms in private houses make available accomodation in hostels from public funds. But public money should not be used to house people as a result of years of lax social policies too many-babies being born in households with little hope of supporting them and giving them a decent start in life and too much immigration because our own workers do not want jobs because housing costs price them out . Rents should only go lower until they can be afforded from wages. If private landlord housing dries up it for a time makes life more difficult for some but the solution is not to waste money in a way that only perpetuates this. Fewer buy to lets means more cheaper houses on the market releasing rented accomodation for those who need it. This takes a long time to work through. The housing bubble has been building for a long time but I doubt our politics being like it is will ever have the chance to deflate to address these problems here in USA.

4spiel 22 May 2012 , 2:14pm

My last post last line ' here and in USA.

hcidata 22 May 2012 , 3:19pm

I went off "bully boy" Diageo when it tried to stop a minow getting a brewing award - http://www.brewdog.com/blog-article/diageo-screw-brewdog-part-ii - If Diageo is frightened of minows it does not have a future!

TonyTwoTimes 23 May 2012 , 10:10am

As per my blackwhite's comments and my response on the 21st, the two companies are
Great Portland Estates and Shaftesbury.

They are property companies with everything in central London, which is a very different market to the rest of Britain. Here's the article link:

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2012/05/23/profiting-from-central-london-property.aspx

polonium210 25 May 2012 , 12:29am

I had a look at the four houses in my terrace in the Surrey commuter belt ...

No. 1: retired Department of Transport; son stacking shelves at Sainsburys.
No. 3 (myself): 25 years' experience of computer security at IT companies on Government contracts but now unemployed for more than a year.
No. 5: Held secretarial positions in IT companies for >20 years; unemployed for 2 years.
No. 7: Researcher in the healthcare field. Unemployed for 18 months. Two daughters at university.

As a direct result of Government economic policy, I went last year from higher-rate taxpayer to non-taxpayer status... despite holding five degrees including a PhD.

I am now making ends meet by teaching some "applied maths" to the Friday night drunks at Internet poker sessions. I am sure that the Government regards this as a sensible use of my time and talents.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.