3 Builders I'd Buy Now

Published in Investing on 16 May 2012

With strong forecasts, the UK's housebuilders are looking like great bargains now.

The best time to buy shares is when they're selling below their fundamental valuations, yes? Why, then, is the market studiously ignoring the FTSE's three bargain housebuilders?

It's surely because of sentiment. After all, the buy-to-let property boom is long gone, and house prices are going nowhere. And with the current state of the economy, far fewer people are rushing to climb the property ladder.

But what if I tell you that these three are sitting on assets that alone are worth more than their share prices, and that those assets are themselves undervalued? Wouldn't that make them worth buying?

Well, here's what a few fundamentals for Barratt Developments (LSE: BDEV), Bovis Homes (LSE: BVS) and Redrow (LSE: RDW) look like, based on their next two full-year forecasts:

CompanyBarrattBovisRedrow
Share price116p433p116p
EPS 20128p26p8p
EPS % 2012+187%+49%+59%
P/E 2012151714
PEG 20120.10.30.2
Dividend 20120.6p7.2p0.5p
Yield 20120.4%1.5%0.4%
EPS 201312p38p11p
EPS % 2013+57%+44%+29%
P/E 2013101211
PEG 20130.20.30.4
Dividend 20131.9p10.3p2.2p
Yield 20131.4%2.2%1.8%
PBV0.40.80.8
PTBV0.60.80.8

(Bovis has a year-end of December, the other two June. Redrow figures allow for the rights issue just concluded.)

Lots of cheap land

Let's start at the bottom of the table and work upwards, looking at that asset value. With price-to-tangible-book (PT/B) values of significantly less than one, you're actually getting more assets for your money than you pay for the share price -- with the caution that asset accounting can be a tricky art.

A lot of that is accounted for by the building land that the three have built up over the past few years, while the slump was on and the brown stuff was going cheap. By the time of its half-year results time in February, Barratt had accumulated 4.6 years' worth of building plots based on its current rate of building, and rated much of it as "high margin", suggesting that it expects to make higher than average profits on the resale of the land once built on.

In March, Redrow told us that it was sitting on 4.7 years' worth of land and, in its annual results delivered the same month, Bovis Homes told us of further growth in its high-margin land bank, with the bulk of its plots in the more profitable south of England.

Bovis update

Talking of Bovis, the firm released an interim management statement today, ahead of its AGM, revealing better sales prices and higher margins, leading to stronger profitability. And that comes a week after Barratt told us it was enjoying its best spring in years.

Bovis reckons that the UK housing market is stable, and that its land purchase programme is already feeding through to higher margins, as its sales mix has moved towards more traditional homes in the south of the country.

Net reservations in the 19 weeks to May 11, at 783, were up 33% on the same period a year ago, after the company opened 23% more active sales outlets. And by that date, Bovis held a total of 1,013 reservations for legal completion in 2012.

Mortgage availability is still a problem for the housing market, but Bovis reported that the government backed NewBuy mortgage scheme, which requires a 5% deposit, is showing early signs of success.

ADVERTISEMENT

Get FREE instant access to our two latest
share recommendations and all our previous picks

If you’re ready to start investing but want someone else to do the hard work for you, Motley Fool Share Advisor can help.

Each month, our analyst team provides the names and details of two top shares for new investment. These aren’t crazy punts or poorly vetted ideas … no, these are thoughtfully researched shares to hold for years.

And we don’t stop at the recommendation.

We provide ongoing coverage for each share we recommend – telling you what to buy and when, but also when sell. To take the guesswork out of building your portfolio, come see how Share Advisor can help you.

Click here to start your 30-day free trial today

Strong forecasts

But lets get back to that table above. All three have very strong forecasts for this year and next, so even without that large asset base, the prospects for rising earnings looks very good. They are all on price-to-earnings (P/E) ratios of around the market average for 2012, but if earnings come in close to forecasts, that will fall significantly for 2013, with all three on prospective P/E ratios of 10-12.

They are all on pretty low PEG valuations too. The PEG, which relates a share's P/E to its expected earnings growth over the same period, is largely used by growth investors (having historically been associated with Jim Slater). But it can be a useful indicator for recovery shares, too -- and a low value (traditionally less than 0.7) is often taken as an indicator of undervaluation.

Dividends low, but coming back

The only downside I see in these companies is their very low dividends. When business was stronger, all were offering decent payouts of around the 4-5% range, but they were stopped during the crisis.

Now they're starting to creep back, though they'll still only be scraping 2% by 2013, and you're not going to get a good income from that. But the bottom of the market has well passed, all three companies are strongly positioned to do well over the next five years, and the only direction I can see for dividends now is up.

So, on the basis of every factor mentioned above, all three builders are strong buys to me.

Investing is by no means easy in today's uncertain economy. That's why we've published "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- our guide to three favourable industries. This free report will be dispatched immediately to your inbox.

Further investment opportunities:

> Alan does not own any shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

JustWannaBuy 16 May 2012 , 3:20pm

Surely the stamp duty holiday which came to an end in March has a part to play in increased sales? I dont see any mention of this and would be interested to see results 6 months down the line.

UncleEbenezer 16 May 2012 , 11:47pm

Since justwannabuy already mentioned one elephant in the shoebox-sized room, let me point at another. This is an industry heavily reliant on taxpayer subsidies to underpin their sale prices. Cut newbuy schemes (which are getting a deservedly bad press) and they lose that artificial premium over old houses. Cut that £20 billion housing benefits bill, and the underpinning of rental yields drops away. Etcetera.

How are falling FITs affecting solar panel installers?

BrnzDrgn 17 May 2012 , 2:14pm

If these companies did proper research of housing requirements rather than just where the cheap land is then they might have a valid business model. We have huge empty estates built by these companies standing empty.

Does their business model include renting properties?

TMFBoing 17 May 2012 , 5:55pm

So, everybody is pessimistic about house builders, eh? That makes it an even better time to buy them :-)

Foolish best,
Alan
TMFBoing

matchmade 18 May 2012 , 9:05am

BrnZDrgn - where exactly are these "huge empty estates . . . standing empty"?

UncleEbenezer: only 5 properties have been sold so far under NewBuy, so you can hardly conclude already that it's a effective subsidy. NewBuy is actually a subsidy by developers and builders to buyers, as the builders have to take on a substantial proportion of the risk and have thousands of pounds of capital held back in the scheme in case of house price falls. The subsidy by the Government is actually to the mortgage companies, and the evidence so far is that the mortgage providers are not exactly offering generous NewBuy mortgages to prospective buyers. They're probably just using NewBuy as an opportunity to increase their margins.

As for the £20 billion housing benefit bill, that does nothing for builders of new homes, but provides an income stream for councils, housing associations and a small proportion of private landlords who are prepared to take on the risk of renting to a benefit claimant. Are you suggesting that the entire £20 billion should be removed, making all the benefit claimants homeless? Even if the benefit bill is shaved by 5% (about which Shelter & Co will complain bitterly), that's only £1 billion saved, of which only a small proprotion is paid to private landlords, and only a very few of them will be in the market to buy new private housing intended for benefit claimants. This is hardly going to make much difference to sales of new houses.

There is very little subsidy to private housebuilders: rather they are treated as a cash cow and taxed from every direction - £15-20,000 per house in S106 infrastructure tax and 35-40% of new estates given away for free to housing associations as "affordable homes" are just two of the taxes specific to new housebuilding, neither of which used to drag down the industry in the past. Instead, the Government saw it as its duty to build schools, roads and so on and to provide social housing, whereas now the cost has to be paid by private housebuilders. And people wonder why so few new houses are built in this country!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.