A Quick Value Check On Banks

Published in Investing on 15 May 2012

The FTSE 100's two-month tumble has exposed bargains among the banks.

In common with millions of British investors, I keep a close eye on the UK's biggest banks.

I do this for two reasons. First, because banks act as a good barometer of the fear and greed that periodically sweep financial markets. Second, because there will come a day when I will buy back into banks -- something I haven't done since 2007.

The falling FTSE 100

Since peaking at 5,966 on 16 March, the blue-chip FTSE 100 index of elite British companies has tumbled. As I write, the Footsie trades at 5,419 -- down almost 550 points (9.1%) since hitting its 2012 peak.

However, as you can see from the following table, the share prices of four big banks have been hammered much harder than the wider market:

BankPrice on 16/03/12 (p)Price on 15/05/12 (p)Change (%)
Barclays (LSE: BARC)254185-27%
Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY)37.528.73-23%
HSBC Holdings (LSE: HSBA)580.4544.2-6%
Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS)28.1421.29-24%
Standard Chartered (LSE: STAN)1,662.51346.5-19%

Source: Yahoo! Finance

As you can see, mega-bank HSBC is the only bank to outperform the FTSE 100 since the March peak, as its share price is down a mere 6%. However, the other four UK-listed banks have fared very badly, with price plunges ranging between 19% at Standard Chartered and 27% at Barclays.

Banking bargains?

The big question is: have these steep falls of the past two months have brought any of the banks deep into value territory? Let's check their fundamentals to find out:

BankForward ratingForecast yieldDividend cover
Barclays6.43.4%4.3
Lloyds Banking Group13.50.2%31.6
HSBC Holdings9.35.0%2.1
Royal Bank of Scotland8.80.0%N/A
Standard Chartered10.13.8%2.6

Source: Digital Look

Looking at this list, there's something for almost every type of investor.

If you're a dividend devotee into defensive shares (as I am), then the best of these five to add to your portfolio would be global giant HSBC. It offers a forward yield of 5%, covered a healthy 2.1 times.

However, if you're more into buying value based on low price-to-earnings ratios, then Barclays is the pick of this bunch. It trades on an ultra-low rating of 6.4 times forward earnings.

If you prefer go-go growth in emerging markets, then pick Standard Chartered. It trades on 10.1 times forward earnings, while offering a dividend of 3.8%, covered a generous 2.6 times.

The two bailed-out, part-nationalised banks remain: Lloyds and RBS. With little or no prospect of dividends in the coming year, these banks strike me as pure asset/recovery plays.

Lloyds has tangible net asset value (NAV) per share of 58.3p and trades at a 51% discount to underlying NAV. For RBS, tangible NAV per share is 48.8p, so its shares trade at an even wider 56% discount to underlying assets.

In summary, each of these five banks has its attractions to different investors. It's up to you to pay your money and take your choice!

Oils, Pharmaceuticals, Banks, Telecoms -- just where should you invest today? "Top Sectors Of 2012" is the Motley Fool's latest guide to help Britain invest. Better. The report is free.

Further investment opportunities:

> Cliff does not own any of the shares mentioned in this article.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Mari11ion 15 May 2012 , 5:40pm

I think the columns are labelled wrongly in the first table.

CunningCliff 15 May 2012 , 6:27pm

Thanks, Mari11ion, I will get this changed ASAP.

All the best,

Cliff

jaizan 15 May 2012 , 7:06pm

I'm not sure it's appropriate to apply the "defensive" tag to banks.
Banking appears to be a cyclical sector, where businesses take ludicrous bets during periods of boom and sometimes require bail outs during the periods of bust. Also, let's just hope none of these banks have been lending to the PIGS, or lending to banks that lend to the PIGS.

Now there may well be "value" in the right banks on a low PE, but even then, are they tending towards "speculative" more than "defensive"?

CunningCliff 15 May 2012 , 11:07pm

Hi Jaizan,

I take your general point about banks being cylical beasts, but I am fairly safe in describing £110bn mega-cap HSBC as a defensive stock. It is certainly a lot less volatile than the other four UK-listed banks!

More on my view of HSBC here:
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/company-comment/2012/02/27/hsbc-hits-the-heights.aspx

All the best,

Cliff

tux222 16 May 2012 , 10:40am

I don't believe it's possible for anyone outside the banking industry to understand the risks of banks as investments. Indeed, the disasters of previous years suggest most insiders, even managements, are just as much in the dark! Most recently, witness JPM's slip-up. Certainly, there's no edge to be found by a private investor. I therefore avoid the sector completely.

billyboy121 16 May 2012 , 1:32pm

Totally agree with tux222 - I, like many others, was burned when the banks crashed - I had viewed them as 'defensive' up until that point also, not any more.

4spiel 16 May 2012 , 1:38pm

RBS are doing this reverse split. The result may be a higher share price of up to 10 times -maybe it will settle at less -who knows but the effect I suspect will be to pull up the SP of LLOY to nearer the NAV . HSBC does have quite a bit of European exposure and we don't yet know how the fiscal issue will be dealt with in the US where they also have substantial exposure.

richjfool 16 May 2012 , 2:36pm

I think I would be staying well away from banks currently, unless you're really into blood on the streets.

The bank least likely to be affected by Greece & Eirozone contagion is/should be Standard Chartered, though at times like this they all get thrown out with the bath water.

globally 16 May 2012 , 4:26pm

When I was a young man, I was taught that the quickest way to lose money was on slow horses and fast women! I would add to those two, bank shares, if my experience is anything to go by, and holding RBS and Lloyds is not half as much fun.

RobinnBanks 17 May 2012 , 12:14am

Nice one globally! They say you're only as old as the woman you feel!

AlysonThomson 17 May 2012 , 12:04pm

Does anyone know when Lloyds are going to resume paying dividends?

spyknife 17 May 2012 , 12:19pm

Lloyds will do a reverse share split, then will resume payments, end of 2013/early 2014.

globally 17 May 2012 , 2:31pm

spyknife - You'd better tell the Board and, if they do know, they're not letting on! As a shareholder, I haven't received any news on that front but are you ahead of the game?

equitybore 20 May 2012 , 7:15am

Barclays to my mind is a complete no no until they start giving shareholders priority over management

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.