The Easiest Way To Beat Your Fund Manager

Published in Investing on 10 May 2012

You have one big advantage over the professionals...

Deep down, there is only one reason we Fools buy stocks and shares: because we think we can make more money than if we handed our cash to an expensive fund manager.

If you don't think you can beat a fund manager, you should hand your money over and let them do the hard work. Both of you will be richer as a result.

You don't, because you think you can do better. Which is madness, quite frankly, because the odds are stacked against you.

Size is everything

You have to be crazy to think you can beat a fund manager. They're bigger than you. They're richer than you. They're backed by expensive teams of researchers and clever computer programs that you can't get for free on the web. They spend their days grilling company bosses who wouldn't give you the time of day.

This isn't David against Goliath, it's much more one-sided than that. Goliath has back-up. You're outnumbered, outgunned and out of your depth.

You can't hope to compete, sitting at your computer terminal in the odd spare hour between doing your day job, washing the dishes and watching your Game of Thrones box set.

So why don't you meekly hand your money over, fork out that annual management fee, and be grateful?

Because you still think you can bring the big guy to his knees.

Oh yes, you do.

Having said that

To be fair, you do have some firepower. Thanks to the internet, you have access to company reports, performance data, market analysis, message board rumours, stock tips, charts and technical analysis (if you understand it).

You have the Motley Fool at your side, and plenty of other private investor websites.

Managers have all that stuff, and more. But you have one weapon they lack: time. Time is on your side.

Busy, busy

Fund managers don't have time. They have targets to meet, reports to write, mandates to fulfill, new investors to impress, existing investors to satisfy as well as a board to satisfy.

If their fund underperforms for a year or two, their reputation is on the block. Investors are a fickle bunch. They love a winner, but they quickly fall out of love with a loser.

A handful of fund managers can afford to be patient, such as Neil Woodford at Invesco Perpetual, because investors have learned to stick by him.

But most are scratching around for an instant result.

You're not. You can afford to take your time.

Virtuous circle

As I recently pointed out, there are seven deadly sins of investing, but there is only one virtue: patience.

All my best investment decisions have ultimately came down to being patient. Take my stake in Ladbrokes (LSE: LAD). That was an also-ran for the first two years, but I stuck it out, pocketed the dividend and waited for it to hit form. And it has. I'm up a reasonable 15%, and it was more before the recent stock market dip.

Drinks giant Diageo (LSE: DGE) isn't a Flaming Ferrari of a stock, but I'm glad I tipped a drop of it to my portfolio three years ago. It has grown slowly and steadily, and I'm up around 35%.

Ditto insurance giant Prudential (LSE: PRU). I didn't sell in a huff following chief executive Tidjane Thiam's ill-fated Asian adventure, but waited for the market to forgive him. The stock has recovered nicely since.

I'm also sticking with Aviva (LSE: AV) and BP (LSE: BP), both of whom have taken a pasting over the last couple of years. They'll be back. GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) and Vodafone (LSE: VOD) aren't exactly shooting the lights out, but the dividends keep rolling in.

And I plan to hold my trackers for decades.

Virtue rewarded

I'll let the City pros thrash around, trying to predict the unpredictable. Nobody can foresee what will happen to this crazy stock market. Anybody who tries is a Mystic Mug.

Not me. I freely confess I don't know when it will recover. I only know that it will, one day. As the old Chinese proverb says, I'm sitting on the riverbank, waiting for things to change.

Any fund manager who said that would be fired on the spot.

When the market dips again, I'll be buying. And then I'll be holding. Patiently. For years. Better still, I won't have to pay any hefty fund management fees.

I may sound more like a tortoise than a hare, but I bet I beat that fund manager in the end.

Enjoy the very latest on investing and the markets, direct from David Kuo. He's helping Britain invest. Better. Join David and The Motley Fool Collective today and you'll receive a special free report -- "10 Steps To Making A Million" -- straight to your inbox.

Further investment opportunities:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

MunroMan 10 May 2012 , 6:02pm

I bet you don't. Do you have any performance or risk data?

GrangeInvestor 10 May 2012 , 7:14pm

I would bet that you'll beat most fund managers over, say, a 10 year period.

I'm not sure you'll beat a cheap FTSE 100 tracker though!

goodlifer 10 May 2012 , 10:04pm

Why all this urge to beat people?
I'm just more than happy to get a fair return for my money.
If other people manage to make a bit, or even a lot, more than you do, why not just wish them luck?

I'm not sure I always believe them anyway.

tru2me 11 May 2012 , 10:22am

So why don't you meekly hand your money over, fork out that annual management fee, and be grateful?

Because Harvey after bitter experiences with an IFA, don't trust someone else to manage or is that plunder my money.
This includes a fund manager.
Even though their cut is miniscule compared to an IFA IMHO it is taking too big a slice of the pie, mostly.

I'm with goodlifer on this.
Why so competitive?
Why the greed?
Why not save some for the next guy?

goodlifer 11 May 2012 , 12:55pm

"So why don't you meekly hand your money over, fork out that annual management fee, and be grateful?"

For one thing, is I like to have some control over what my money's invested in.

Some whizz-kid fund manager might put it into tobaccos, McDonalds and weaponry, and a tracker almost certainly would.

GrangeInvestor 11 May 2012 , 1:10pm

Let's say that over the next 10 years shares are going to give investors an 8% return each year.

Whether the shares are owned by investors directly, through trackers or by fund managers is going to make no difference to that return.

So the question is do we as investors want to take that 8% ourselves or do we want to share it with fund managers. The real annual fee can easily by 2% so we could be looking at 25% of our return going to the financial services industry rather than to us, the people who worked hard to make the money in the first place.

OsbieFeel 12 May 2012 , 10:32pm

I find that the best way to beat a fund manager is with a baseball bat.

As General Allenby says in "Lawrence of Arabia," doing nothing is usually the best strategy. This seems especially true of investing in shares, but it's a luxury that fund managers cannot be seen to indulge in. Advantage to us, I reckon.

And speaking as a congenitally lazy git, I also find it's a strategy that suits my temperament!

ANuvver 13 May 2012 , 11:47pm

goodlifer:

Ethical point taken. We all have our own comfort point, and mine is looser than yours.

IMO, basic foodstuffs and water supply are the coming thing. I'll hold tobacco and booze, but I refuse to make a calculated play on hunger.

Osbie:

The Allenby approach ("Has he gawn native?" "I think he would if he could, sah") has served me well. An awful lot of problems dissolve when you do nothing - but you have to be ready to devote your full attention to those that need it. Pareto thinking, if you will.

hcidata 14 May 2012 , 1:51pm

I went off Diageo after when they were branded a "Beer Bully" by the press and apologised after admitting a "serious misjudgement" over the British Institute of Innkeeping (BII) awards.


See http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-scotland-18005851 and
http://www.brewdog.com/blog-article/diageo-screw-brewdog-part-ii

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.