The Lesson Of The French And Greek Elections

Published in Investing on 8 May 2012

How the recent elections affect investors.

In February I pointed out that Europe could look very different by 6 May, with possibly a socialist French president and a recalcitrant Greek parliament potentially spelling the end of the eurozone.

Well, what do you know? It's 8 May and we have a socialist French president and a Greek parliament seemingly unable to form a government. I sold some shares last month, saying at the time that "Greek and French elections could be the trigger for the next small panic". In fact, markets have softened but held their nerve.

It's not that I have any great psephological talents. The remarkable feature of the Greek tragedy that is the euro crisis is just how predictable it all is -- both the French and Greek electorates delivered what the pundits and polls predicted.

The inevitability of all this creates opportunities as well as challenges for investors.

Oscillations

Stepping back a little, it's clear that confidence in the eurozone oscillates up and down, and that those oscillations are increasing in intensity.

On the first dip, our politicians quietly dropped the orthodox rhetoric of 'our European partners'. Around the time of the general election, Mr 'Cleggeron' and Mr Milliband (either) peppered every statement with the phrase.

We were told that dissolving the euro would destroy our livelihoods and plunge the continent into eternal darkness, or something like it. But come another dip in the eurozone's fortunes and it emerged that the Treasury -- and the European Commission itself -- had quietly researched what a break-up of the euro would look like.

Another cycle on, and Angela Merkel herself ratcheted up the euro risk, stymieing a referendum in Greece by threatening its expulsion from the single currency. That led to the Greek premier's resignation and the installation of a technocratic government, whose policies were widely rejected by voters at the weekend.

Only last December, when ECB president Mario Draghi admitted the possibility of the euro breaking up, and rating agency Fitch concluded that "a comprehensive solution to the eurozone crisis is technically and politically beyond reach", it was highly controversial and ground-breaking. But gradually taboos surrounding 'Grexit' were broken.

Now, some economic pundits regard one or more countries leaving the euro as more likely than not.

Upside

In-between these lows in confidence, the upside of the oscillations have been provided by bullish political noises and a new EU Treaty that technically isn't, and by the ECB inventing its version of quantitative easing: the long-term refinancing operation (LTRO).

It's not difficult to predict that we will have more of the same. Greece will continue to worry markets for some time, especially if it has to hold new elections. In France, Francois Hollande will no doubt nuance his rhetoric once in office, but his election is bound to depress confidence in the eurozone.

A renewed euro crisis will trigger a political response. So prepare to hear much talk of a 'European Growth Pact'. If things get really tough then the ECB will undertake another round of LTRO, and markets will be flush with new money. But who imagines that will be the end of the story? So there's a couple more iterations to come yet.

Strategy

That suggest a twin-track strategy to me. It's still not too late to prepare for a euro break-up. It may not happen, but it's more likely now than when I first suggested it. Certainly, the bookmakers think so.

Secondly, there is money to be made in trading stocks that mirror euro confidence. Many financial stocks rise and fall in tandem with market sentiment towards Europe. If they're stocks you're happy to hold for the long term, there's a good risk-reward trade-off to be exploited by adding to your holding when euro sentiment is low and reducing when it's high.

Does that mean out-thinking the market? I regard it as just being contrarian. There are plenty of professional market participants who make their money (i.e. keep their jobs) by running with the herd.

Companies

With the rhetoric of 'European partners' consigned to the dustbin, let's hope we hear a bit more from our politicians about how we beat our European competitors. The biggest risk of the euro is our overdependence on Europe as an export destination.

In contrast, the UK's share of the BRIC nations' imports is appalling. Britain slipped from fifth to tenth place in the league of world trade between 2000 and 2010, largely because of its poor share of BRIC nation imports.

But the stability of sterling should be an enormous national competitive advantage. Unlike Mediterranean countries, there is no risk of the currency of our export contracts disappearing overnight. Unlike Germany, there is no risk of our currency massively appreciating when it ceases to be artificially held back by a currency union.

British Consulates should be broadcasting that from Rio to Beijing. And companies should be telling investors that's where their export strategy lies.

The long-term lesson is that, far from gambling our prosperity on Europe, companies and investors will earn more by following the shift of global wealth.

Investing is by no means easy in today's uncertain economy. That's why we've published "Top Sectors Of 2012" -- our guide to three favourable industries. This free report will be dispatched immediately to your inbox.

Further investment opportunities:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

goodlifer 08 May 2012 , 10:50pm

Can anyone please explain, in Janet-and -John language, why a share in SBRY, RDSB or SSE is worth any less (or more) than it was yesterday?

Or is the market just making a mountain out of a molehill?

mcturra2000 09 May 2012 , 7:42am

Basically, it seems that EU countries are addicted pathologically to debt. As soon as they try austerity, aimed at reducing debt, they feel the pain of reduced growth. It's too much to bare, so governments resume stimulus packages, feeding money into the system. This produces growth, but only of the artificial sort. That growth is fueled by debt.

And so it goes. Despite staggering debt, it just keeps mounting. Governments have recently made their intentions quite clear - expect more of the same. Don't expect interest rates to go up any time soon, either. Governments will keep them low in order to make their debts more manageable.

Whether that will lead to the break-up of the Euro, I don't know. Perhaps Germany should ask itself if the EU is so important that it is willing to prop up every other country in order to sustain it.

TRhere 09 May 2012 , 8:36am

Goodlifer,

I guess the main rationale is that an economic crisis in Europe will affect the global and UK economy, and so reduce the future growth of earnings of those companies, which in turn will reduce their future dividend growth.

Tony R

endofthetunnel 09 May 2012 , 3:44pm

The only surprise of the French election was the small margin of victory of Francois Hollande. He was comfortably ahead in the polls for months before the elections. The serious money was surely not surprised by the result.

The manifesto of Hollande was remarkably similar to Sarkozy. The big difference is the anti-finance populist rhetoric with a tax on the super rich (expected to affect a couple of thousand households earning > €1m a year) and a pretense at reducing the retirement age (only for those who have worked uninterrupted for 40 years). He does not plan to blow up the eurozone - au contraire he is totally committed to it and the ideology of a closer Europe. He knew he wouldn't be able to re-negotiate the fiscal treaty but hopes to get some sort of meaningless growth language agreed as a fig leaf to justify his rather hollow election promise on that front.
He plans to spend a bit more than Sarko (but quell the deficit just 1 year later than Sarkozy - something not achieved in France since the 70's so not an easy task).
Even Merkel must realize that traditional good house-keeping is politically unachievable in most of Europe so to keep it all together some smoke and mirrors will be needed which will allow continued spending - which may we where his Eurobond idea could get off the ground.

snoekie 09 May 2012 , 9:26pm

mctarre, just what are the govts baring? Their clothes are already in tatters.

As for France, they will probably negotiate an increase in their CP payments, and Brussels will trip over their feet in their haste to comply, to justify their bigger demands from their members who are already cutting back massively.

Not for Brussels to adopt the hirsute stance. Just with for their higher demands, reinforced by the MEPs and the communist kommisars so that they can wax fat on greater expenses and wasteful projects and 'public (perhaps pubic, per mctarre??) works' (not to mentionthe billions taken by fraudulent schemes, which Brussels refuses to investigate lest some kommisars are found to have their fingers therein, directly or indirectly) which will be a total waste of money serving no real purpose.

Time for the police to do their duty to haul in the kommisars to explain their fraudulent refusal to produce proper accounts and to imprison those involved, and uber massive fines, on top of reimbursement.

Well I can dream can't I?

goodlifer 09 May 2012 , 11:14pm

Thanks, Tony R

"I guess the main rationale is that an economic crisis in Europe will affect the global and UK economy, and so reduce the future growth of earnings of those companies, which in turn will reduce their future dividend growth."

Are they really right to think this about the companies I mentioned?
Or are they just in panic mode?

TRhere 10 May 2012 , 9:39am

Goodlifer,

Well RDSB is affected by demand for/price of oil so is vulnerable to a decline in global growth. SBRY, and especially SSE, ought to be reasonably defensive, but when I did my own research on how they had performed during the 2008/9 crisis, neither were very resilient. It's here:

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2012/01/10/preparing-for-a-clear-and-present-danger.aspx

AlysonThomson 10 May 2012 , 12:21pm

It's been pretty good for me in the short term. I was buying Euros for my forthcoming holiday yesterday! However, I'm now not keen to bring any back home with me, in case the currency goes tits up - which is not all that unlikely.

AlysonThomson 10 May 2012 , 12:22pm

Also, diesel appears to be cheaper!

snikmij 10 May 2012 , 1:38pm

The worry for me is that left & right policies are becoming more popular for the electorate.

I have some sympathy as the crisis wasn't caused by most of the people living in these countries, they just trusted (had faith?) in the management of the economy by financiers and politicians but the people pay by sharing in the problem.

Somewhat similar to the 1930's when Hitler came to power whether this could end with something similar does make me somewhat pensive. I would have thought that should have occurred to the German leadership.

goodlifer 10 May 2012 , 5:30pm

Thanks again, Tony R

Your research doesn't seem to say much about dividends.
To a dividend reinvestor like me the paper price can go down as much as it likes so long as the dividends keep thudding consistently in.

"RDSB is affected by demand for/price of oil so is vulnerable to a decline in global growth."
Can you really see the price of petrol coming down over the next few years?

goodlifer 10 May 2012 , 11:45pm

Were their recent Olympics the last straw to break the Greek economy's back?

If so, what about us?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.