Which Share Should I Buy Now?

Published in Investing on 20 March 2012

One young Foolish investor is looking to invest in today's buoyant market.

My Foolish colleague David Holding wrote yesterday: "All were bears not long ago. Now it seems everyone's a bull. What's an investor to do?"

It's a question that's been vexing my teenage son, Sim, in the past couple of weeks, as he weighs up the next investment for his Family Firms Portfolio.

In a moment, I'll tell you about the companies that top his shortlist, including a particularly interesting small firm that will be announcing its annual results this coming Friday. But first, a quick update on developments since our last look at the portfolio in October.

All were bears

Having invested in one company each month through the year to July 2011, Sim overcame his fears as a bear market virgin when the markets dived in August to up his investments to two a month.

A period of intense activity culminated with four investments in November when Sim averaged down on his existing holdings in soft drinks maker Nichols (LSE: NICL) and household goods giant Reckitt Benckiser (LSE: RB) (twice), and bought a new holding in investment trust Manchester & London (LSE: MNL).

Since the buying spree, Sim's been a bit short of cash and so far in 2012 hasn't made an investment. However, with the proceeds from the takeover of Robert Wiseman Dairies now sitting in our Motley Fool ShareBuilder account, he's been reacquainting himself with his portfolio and watchlist with a view to putting his Wiseman 'winnings' to work.

Now everyone's a bull

The unit value of the Family Firms Portfolio is currently showing a 70% gain versus a 36% return from HSBC's FTSE All-Share Index tracker, compared with figures of 49% and 19%, respectively, when Sim last looked at the values in October.

You won't be surprised to learn that he found the valuations the market was placing on the companies in his portfolio and watchlist to be generally a good bit richer now than in the late summer and autumn of last year.

In fact, Sim found the current situation to be similar to the months leading up to last year's August market crash when we had found it increasingly difficult to unearth compelling investment opportunities using sales, earnings and dividend valuation methods.

What's an investor to do?

Like a year ago, we've found ourselves focusing largely on companies with reasonably priced, high-quality assets.

Pub groups Fuller, Smith & Turner (LSE: FSTA) and Young & Co (LSE: YNGA) have classy London properties on their books at long-outdated valuations, while their recent subdued share prices seem to reflect the market's temporary ennui over the looming Budget and another beer tax rise.

In fact, we were set to invest in Fullers, which is an existing holding, on last week's scheduled ShareBuilder investment date, but the price moved above our 700p target the night before. And we won't be investing in Fullers this week either, because I'm subject to disclosure and trading rules relating to the shares I write about.

The same goes for another company we've been looking at: Robinson (LSE: RBN). This AIM-listed packaging firm, which we first invested in last May, will be announcing its annual results this coming Friday.

Still value?

According to Sim's calculations today, Robinson's assets compare with last year as follows:

 Share priceMarket capNet asset valueDiscount to nav
Today89p£14.2m£22.6m37%
Last year72p£11.5m£21.1m45%

On one hand, the assets are flattered by a £7.7m pension surplus, but on the other, £1.8m of the surplus is held in an escrow account and may be returned to shareholders at some point in the future. More significantly, Robinson has a substantial portfolio of surplus property that is valued in the books with no regard to its development potential.

The discount to net asset value is not as wide as last year, but still appears attractive, while the business itself is arguably stronger today than previously. Robinson produced 7.8p earnings per share from continuing operations for the 2010 full year. In the first half of 2011, the company has done 4.2p and hiked the interim dividend 17% for good measure.

In a trading update in January, the company said it anticipates the final results for 2011 will show improved profitability from continuing operations. It also said it expects the addition of recently won contracts to support continued growth in 2012.

In Robinson and the pub groups, I think Sim's found two or three perfectly investible companies. He just has to answer the question "Which share should I buy now?" -- focusing on the company fundamentals and closing his ears to those pundits who are saying "the market has got a bit ahead of itself" or "the Footsie chart is looking a bit toppy".

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

More from G A Chester:

> G A Chester & Son own shares in Fuller, Smith & Turner, Manchester & London, Nichols, Reckitt Benckiser and Robinson. The Motley Fool owns shares in Reckitt Benckiser.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

QuantumDealer 20 Mar 2012 , 12:18pm

What about liquidity risk for a stock like Robinson (RBN)? It only trades 10 times a month (avg. of the last 6 months) according to the LSE website. Only c.1,100 shares traded today...value of just over a grand. When the fan gets another smattering of the brown stuff, will you be able to exit this stock if required? Or if they miss earnings? Do you factor that in to your 'reasons for ownership' analysis anywhere? Buying illiquid stocks should only be done at a significant discount as a margin of safety when a sharp exit is required...I would be interested to hear your thoughts on this issue by reply please. Thanks in advance.

M0byDick 20 Mar 2012 , 1:42pm

@QuantumDealer
Yes, spot on about the liquidity. RBN is far and away the smallest and least liquid share in the portfolio.
When the fan gets another smattering of the brown stuff, will you be able to exit this stock if required?
If the share price is dragged down by general market sentiment, but its fundamentals haven't changed, we'd be buyers rather than sellers.
Or if they miss earnings?
As long-term investors in the business, we also wouldn't be sellers if RBN suffered an earnings setback, provided we believed it could return to growth in due course.
The situation that would be a problem would be a fundamental change for the worse in the company or its market, from which we felt it could never recover or adapt. We've bought RBN at a significant discount to the value of its property, but it would be foolish to think we would be able to escape without suffering a loss any circumstances.
For that reason, personally I would only ever have a very small weighting of the type of illiquid small cap RBN is in my portfolio -- and accept that I may not be able to liquidate the shares at short notice.
Foolish best
MobyDick (G A Chester - article author)

sixftsam 20 Mar 2012 , 2:16pm

I agree with G A Chester. I'm only 27 myself and tend to be investing in quite a few small cap stocks that have a market cap below their tangible NAV.

The way that I think of it, I can sit in for the long term and ride out the fluctuations. I am able to Use my age as an advantage to mean I can hold the share far far longer than fund managers, and for longer than most of you old timers (sorry!) means that I can play to my own particular strengths.

If Sim is a teenager, he has even an advantage over me on the time horizon, and what might constitute a sell for you or even I QuantumDealer may reflect a chance for Sim to buy on the dip and hold for the longer term for a recovery.

QuantumDealer 20 Mar 2012 , 3:39pm

G A Chester,

I keep reading articles on here which say something to the effect that 'one earnings miss is usually accompanied by 1 or 2 others in sequential quarters' - does that not apply to this stock then?

You also imply that an earnings miss is not a major concern to you if the basis of your growth thesis for the business remains intact - really? Sounds like 'value-trap' investing, to me on the grounds that if a stock you own does in fact miss earnings then the fundamentals of the business, by definition, have changed from your original prognosis (unless of course you set out to buy stocks which are going to miss earnings which I am certain you do not).

I respect your statement about only having a small'ish weighting. Portfolio construction is so often overlooked and yet incredibly important. Sector exposures, market cap exposure, stock specific betas, liquidity, banking covenants are all important aspects of portfolio construction which need to be factored in so credit to you for at least scaling the position appropriately. However, I am still dubious as to whether a stock which trades less than £2,000 by value per day is a safe one to own given you could end up owning a position which is 2 times the avg daily volume...even in large-cap space this would be a major concern to any respectable portfolio manager with a decent trader working for him, never mind in micro-cap space)! Also, some of the float looks to be tied up by family members which exacerbates this problem even more as they will be long-term holders.

I think your best bet for an 'out' would be for a takeover by say RPC, or similar. To me, it looks like it could be an ideal fit with them and easy for them to swallow too. RBN looks cheap, if not extremely cheap, and for that reason I too am interested. I am still trying to work out how I would be able to liquidate my position (to you or A N Other existing holder of stock) if the stock turns south.


Sam,

Who are you calling an 'old timer'?!! You have no idea how young I am...I could be younger than you. Additionally, experience counts in investing too, you know. My view would always be to build a stable portfolio of mid/large cap names and then re-invest the dividend streams over the next 5-10 years into smaller cap names rather than vice-versa. I realise you still have income to earn and time on your hands to recoup any losses but you also do not have so much time on your hands as you think for numerous false starts or small cap disasters.

I like to think of a wide-based pyramid with many levels of different risk exposures within each major asset class pyramiding up from a large lower risk platform to incrementally higher risk investments. The equity one would have a base tier of large and possibly mid-cap dividend earners, then a level of large/mid-cap growers, then some smaller cap names etc.

The bond pyramid would be harder to construct at present given that the base would be unappealing to construct using developed Govt. bonds, but I'm sure you get the idea in a 'normal world' environment (granted, not the last few years)!

" If Sim is a teenager, he has even an advantage over me on the time horizon, and what might constitute a sell for you or even I QuantumDealer may reflect a chance for Sim to buy on the dip and hold for the longer term for a recovery" ...and possibly fall into a liquidity and value-trap, see his position marked down gradually over time, watch his cash ebb away with a thousand cuts and end up being put off investing, for life! Just a thought...

sixftsam 20 Mar 2012 , 4:57pm

The "old timers" comment was more targetted at the Fools in general QuantumDealer, I'm well aware I am a whippersnapper compared to many of you here.

It's a fairly detailed reply you have given here to the article, but I would just like to raise one point I think is vital: We all invest with a different risk profile, for different reasons, and with different company valuations in mind. If we didnt, the market wouldn't ever move as everyone would price everything the same. One persons value trap is another persons recovery story... only time will tell who was right and who was wrong, and that is the joy of investing.

robbinsbox 20 Mar 2012 , 5:33pm

+1 for spread and liquidity issues. Novices should stick to mega-caps unless they want to learn the hard way.

QuantumDealer 20 Mar 2012 , 6:10pm

...if you only invest for special sits. or recovery stocks then you will most likely be working for a very long time. I have seen too many people ruin well diversified portfolios by being far too concentrated in these kind of 'recovery' stocks - as they fall, and keep on falling, investors have been lured into averaging down multiple times. One out of ten may work (at best) and get back to a reasonable price level but the majority lag for years and underperform the index by a substantial amount and hence lose you money overall.

Can you provide some examples of the stocks you tend to invest in? For the past few years I have prefered to be a holder of PFC, RR, BG, MTO, ULVR, MRO, VCT, WEIR, APR, EZJ, VOD, IMT, AZN, BBY, GSK etc. etc.

Examples of recovery names for me are AZN, BBY out of that bunch...would like to hear what stocks you prefer to hold if you have time.

sixftsam 20 Mar 2012 , 8:23pm

Quantum, I was more playing the devils advocate side of the coin, but I dont like that I am finding your replies becoming increasingly hostile on a site I have always thought to be rather welcoming up until now.

A couple of my investments have included Aga Rangemaster as a smallish cap which personally I believe to have a good Buffet style moat, Cardiff property as it is 50% ish family owned, trading at a good discount to NAV and in an area I understand and would run a business myself, and (the not so small cap) BAE when the defense cuts were all the talk.

Perhaps large spreads and a small cap become less of an issue when there is a decent portfolio of assets to back up the price meaning there wouldn't be a reason to "jump ship"

QuantumDealer 21 Mar 2012 , 12:27pm

Hostile?! Get real...

john10001 21 Mar 2012 , 8:34pm

TSCO is a pretty good large cap play at the moment. Last year Tesco messed up trying to compete with Asda on price. You can be assured that this year they will correct that and focus on what they are good at again to gain back market share and have a much better year. They have a good management team their despite the recent uphevals and I think they are undervalued at the moment and a good time to buy for long term buy and hold.

QuantumDealer 21 Mar 2012 , 9:54pm

Isn't Sainsbury's stealing market share from them this year given SBRY's decent numbers today? Every time I go to a Tesco store I am underwhelmed by the store, the presentation of the product, the sometimes ludicrous offers (which cost more than the product on its own!) and the lighting is so garishly bright. Many mid-sized Tesco stores do not even have a butchery or fishmongers in London whereas same-sized Waitrose stores do. I think TSCO has a lot of work to do to get back to their previous mid/high single digit growth phase. I also notice a lot more freezer units in a Tesco than a same-sized Waitrose store - the squeezed low/middle income earners who got to Tesco must be spending less per visit. Not sure their international expansion plans haven't been anything more than a distraction these past 5 years too...the US expansion has been an unmitigated disaster to date.

QuantumDealer 23 Mar 2012 , 12:34pm

I hope you guys bought some Robinson on Tuesday...ticking up nicely today on positive dividend news - still like the industry and the stock, just not so fond of the volume.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.