Income Growth For The Lazy Investor

Published in Investing on 12 March 2012

You don't need to be a financial wizard to build a growing stream of dividends.

A couple of years ago, I set out a minimum-effort income strategy. It was designed as an alternative to an annuity for those prepared to accept the risks of equity investment. The objective was simple: to deliver a growing stream of dividends.

The strategy taps the average dividend-generating capacity of a mundane basket of investment trusts, which are similar to unit trust/OEIC funds but listed on the stock market. In my original article, I constructed a sample portfolio to demonstrate the approach and I've since been tracking it to see how well it meets its objective.

Ten trusty trusts

A characteristic of investment trusts is that they don't have to distribute all their annual income. Many run a 'revenue reserve', which they add to in times of abundance and draw on in times of famine. The idea is to pay a growing dividend to their shareholders through thick and thin.

In constructing my demo portfolio, I sought out trusts of a reasonable size (market capitalisation) and with a reasonable dividend yield. I also looked for a good history of rising dividends (at least 10 years), a stated objective of increasing dividends in the future and a reasonable revenue reserve to draw on should circumstances demand.

I selected a portfolio of 10 trusts, the core of which came from the UK Growth & Income sector. I also threw in a UK Growth trust that was on a reasonable yield and a couple of trusts with a global mandate, just for variety.

Dividend growth

In the table below, the final column shows the dividend growth in the year to 9 March 2012; the other columns show annual dividend growth in the preceding four years on a like basis.

Company2007/82008/92009/102010/112011/12
Bankers (LSE: BNKR)*8.08.04.05.25.0
City of London (LSE: CTY)*10.811.72.05.53.1
F&C Capital & Income (LSE: FCI)13.46.62.52.42.4
Invesco Income Growth (LSE: IVI)11.15.62.44.01.7
JPMorgan Claverhouse (LSE: JCH)*13.37.23.03.64.3
Merchants Trust (LSE: MRCH)*8.13.81.41.80.4
Murray Income (LSE: MUT)*11.011.10.90.92.7
Schroder Income Growth (LSE: SCF)17.16.12.32.22.2
Scottish American (LSE: SCAM)11.56.13.42.22.2
Temple Bar (LSE: TMPL)*5.36.04.02.0** 12.5
AVERAGE11.07.22.63.03.6

* Denotes a 20+ year record of increasing dividends.
** Temple Bar's large increase in 2011/12 was as a result of a one-off rebalancing of its interim and final dividends.

As the table shows, over the past five years the investment trusts have continued their long records of growing their dividends, including through the 2008/09 recession -- a time when many income investors in individual blue chips were reporting falls in excess of 30% in the income of their portfolios.

However, it should be noted that, in the most recent two years, while the trusts' average growth has continued to be positive in absolute terms it has modestly undershot inflation.

Investment trust dividend growth

The sub-inflationary growth of the last two years has been due to trusts' self-restraint while dipping into their revenue reserves; and, more recently, as dividends from their underlying holdings have improved, to some trusts beginning to replenish, or reinforce, their reserves rather than passing the full income on to shareholders.

In the coming year, the prospect of a return to dividend growth ahead of inflation looks promising on the face of it, particularly as inflation appears to be moderating. However, much will depend on how aggressively trusts channel revenue into their reserve pots.

I suspect many trusts may deem it prudent to give shareholders no more than an in-line-with-inflation dividend increase this year, because economic recovery remains fragile and interest on cash and gilt yields are so pitiful.

Still attractive?

Is the basket of 10 investment trusts I selected in 2010 still attractive to income seekers today? The share prices, trailing yields and dividend cover by revenue reserve of the trusts at 9 March 2010 and today are shown in the table below.

CompanyShare
price
(p) at
9/3/10
Share
price
(p) at
9/3/12
Yield
(%) at
9/3/10
Yield
(%) at
9/3/12
Dividend cover
by revenue
reserve (%)
at year end
2009
Dividend cover
by revenue
reserve (%)
at year end
2011
Bankers3804213.03.0239220
City of London2612974.74.510095
F&C Capital & Income2132223.93.97989
Invesco Income Growth1762104.94.4106132
JPMorgan Claverhouse4244314.04.2177142
Merchants Trust3533836.36.0134105
Murray Income5556595.04.4118148
Schroder Income Growth1821974.94.711089
Scottish American2002324.54.1144130
Temple Bar8019454.1* 3.7159135
AVERAGE  4.54.3137129

* Temple Bar's yield has been adjusted to take account of the one-off rebalancing of its interim and final dividends.

The current revenue reserves remain respectable, despite the majority (and the average) being lower than two years ago. All are above F&C Capital Income's 79% that I found borderline acceptable in 2010.

The current average yield on the portfolio, 4.3%, compares with 4.5% in March 2010 (and 4.2% in March 2011). For a spell in the second half of last year it rose to a very attractive 4.8%.

Currently, then, the yield is nearer the lower end of the range seen in the past few years, though it still compares favourably with the FTSE All-Share's 3.4%.

Robust and bountiful

In my view, the basket of investment trusts has done a decent job of delivering income through the whirlwind of company dividend cuts that followed the credit crunch.

If a few years of sub-inflationary income growth through 'the worst economic crisis since the 1930s' is as bad as it gets, the strategy will have shown itself to be as robust in foul weather as it has been bountiful in fair.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Avalaugh 12 Mar 2012 , 12:27pm

Would have liked to see Foreign and Colonial IT in the list,

ANuvver 12 Mar 2012 , 1:06pm

I know the accent here is on laziness, but you could just grab high-yielding blue chips and save yourself the fees...

Hannibalis 12 Mar 2012 , 3:42pm

It's not bad and it's pretty low effort. You can get near to the current yield of that portfolio with UK perpetual gilts (consols), although neither the capital or income is likely to grow.

However, I expect MF readers will want a little more. My own income portfolio is yielding 50% more than these 'experts' - but then again I don't have an income reserve
http://www.the-diy-income-investor.com/p/portfolio-uk-based.html

As ANuvver says - it will probably be more lucrative (and more interesting) to do some DIY income investing.

rober00 12 Mar 2012 , 4:05pm

My portfolio has a high yield objective and is two thirds or so invested in ITs. Interestingly I own NONE of the trusts above as their average yield is too low for me. I did previously own Merchants Trust but found an alternative with roughly twice the yield.

I suppose if you are willing to accept being lazy the above is not a bad suggestion.

Avalaugh 13 Mar 2012 , 12:36pm

roberOO
Twice merchants, there must be a specilist fund that probably wont grow yield as fast or is risky,

Basia02 13 Mar 2012 , 12:58pm

Did the same thing with Unit Trusts, both shares and Corporate Bonds, re-investing the money I had in Cash Bonds into these. The Bonds made quite a good capital gain, and the equity funds capital values are slightly down. However the income has grown and the yields at around 7% have offset this and been great. I chose Funds as I am not an expert in corporate bonds, and as these are long term holdings.
I also moved into high yielding shares at 5-7%, but noticed that some unit trusts had higher yields and had invested in the same shares so I took the higher yields

GoldenSoldier 13 Mar 2012 , 1:30pm

I note that the dividend of that portfolio had an average real growth of just under 2% over that 5 year period

sliverfox101 13 Mar 2012 , 1:54pm

Roberoo, I would be interested to know what investment trusts you are invested in with such high yields. I guess with a 8-9%+yield, they may be quite risky?

richjfool 13 Mar 2012 , 1:57pm

There's a lot of variation in the gearing and risk of the above trusts. E.g. Merchants 127%. Scot American 129%, as against City of London and Temple Bar at 111%:

Futurefix 13 Mar 2012 , 2:31pm

The approach can be useful to someone who is assembling a portfolio for another person who is unable or unwilling to do it themselves.

A range of collective investments such as this can do its job of growth and income and be left alone with only occasional reviews.

koochak 13 Mar 2012 , 6:24pm

To compare RPI/CPI with dividend growth rate is misleading. Should be compared with yield.

Aidan1927 14 Mar 2012 , 11:06am

Some of those trust will be investing in very similar shares. I would replace a couple of them with a couple of trust that give more exposure to emerging markets, say JP Morgan Emerging Markets Income and Schroder Asian Income.

Both these offer a reasonable income and aim to increase it year on year. I would (and have by investing in them) bet they will out perform most or all of the above 10 over the medium to long term.

ScillyFool 15 Mar 2012 , 12:40pm

Very interesting, MOby. The message I got from your article is that there is only one IT that stands out from the rest - Bankers. Why would I bother investing in the rest?

I would be interested to see how Murray International and Henderson Far East Income would have stacked up against your choices.

ScillyFool

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.