The End Of Peak Oil Theory

Published in Investing on 19 February 2012

Instead of hitting peak oil as many have predicted, worldwide oil production seems to be going up.

A version of this article originally appeared on our US site, Fool.com.

Last week I got caught up in a show from a few years ago called "Mega Disasters: Oil Apocalypse" on The History Channel, spelling out the doom our economy was facing as oil production declined over the next 100 years. Domestic production was already declining, and we had no plan B. Stock up on canned soup and ammo while you still can!

If you haven't noticed, the oil apocalypse has been delayed -- again -- and the doomsday predictors are undoubtedly eating crow while they concoct another mega disaster. "Peak oil," the theory that oil production will soon hit a peak and begin declining, sending the world into an economic disaster, failed to live up to its hype again.

It's amazing how fast perceptions of our energy future can change. One day prevailing wisdom tells us that energy costs are going to rise uncontrollably as oil production declines and new energy sources fail to live up to their promise. The next, our problems are solved, and our reliance on foreign oil appears to be evaporating before our eyes.

The oil scare that never goes away

We've been hearing about peak oil for years, and even some of the brightest minds in energy think the theory has some validity. But, like any other apocalypse, it never quite seems to unfold as the predictions assert. There are just too many factors that peak oil prognosticators can't account for in their bold predictions, so they always get them wrong.

Innovation trumps conventional wisdom

One of the problems with peak oil predictions is that they have so little imagination. They don't consider the impact of new drilling techniques that open new oil fields to massive amounts of production. A decade ago, shale drilling wasn't a well-known technique outside of the industry, much less a major contributor to our oil production. Today, Kodiak Oil & Gas (NYSE: KOG.US), Continental Resources, and Whiting Petroleum have turned the desolate North Dakota prairie into an energy bonanza by unlocking shale oil there.

Offshore drilling has also grown by leaps and bounds. Drillers like SeaDrill (NYSE: SDRL.US), Transocean (NYSE: RIG.US), and Noble are building ultra-deepwater rigs as fast as they can to unlock new fields off the coasts of Brazil, Angola, and other parts of the world that were once out of our reach.

Then there are Canadian oil sands, which hold the second-largest oil reserves in the world, behind Saudi Arabia. These developments alone unlocked enough oil to delay peak oil for a few more years at least.

Evidence that these innovations have turned peak oil on its head is undeniable. According to Bentek Energy, North American oil production will top a 40-year-old peak by 2016. The U.S. Energy Information Administration predicts that by 2020, U.S. oil production alone will grow another 20% to 6.7 million barrels per day. Even OPEC's surplus oil production capacity is expected to increase from 2.55 million barrels per day in 2011 to 3.92 million barrels per day by the end of 2013.

It's hard to see how oil production could fall in the short term. And longer-term peak oil theorists have even more problems on their hands.

Alternatives make a peak irrelevant

For the last century there were very few alternatives to the black gold that flowed freely from wells around the world. Today the dynamic is slowly changing, squashing the fear that peak oil once garnered. If diesel fuel gets too expensive, now truckers have an alternative in liquefied or compressed natural gas. Westport Innovations (NASDAQ: WPRT.US) provides the technology to make the engines possible, and Clean Energy Fuels (NASDAQ: CLNE.US) is quickly building a national natural gas highway to make fueling possible.

On the consumer side, manufacturers are releasing not only natural gas vehicles but electric vehicles, as well. Electric vehicles may not be for everyone, but as fellow Fool Alex Planes points out, the adoption rate has been even faster than that of hybrids a decade ago. These alternatives will play a roll in curbing demand for oil.

To top it off, new fuel efficiency standards that call for average fuel economy of 54.5 mpg are going to make vehicles even less dependent on oil and gas over the next two decades.

Putting peak oil to rest

In 10 years oil will no doubt play a major role in our energy picture, but the grasp it had a decade ago is slowly fading. Alternatives, efficiency, and new drilling techniques make the once frightful concept of peak oil nearly irrelevant. This isn't to suggest that prices will suddenly fall, only that a pending economic collapse because of a decline in oil production can be shelved for the time being.

Looking out beyond the next decade, it's hard to see how energy sources like solar, natural gas, wind, and even biofuels couldn't slowly replace our current addiction to oil. Sorry, peak oil theorists, this Fool is putting your predictions of doom to rest.

> Get the latest on investing and the markets, direct from the desk of David Kuo. You'll also receive a special free report on '10 Steps To Making A Million' if you join The Motley Fool Collective today.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

mao44 19 Feb 2012 , 6:40pm

So why is fuel so expensive. We know tax plays a massive part but why is diesel currently at it's most expensive. The short answer is rip off!

Johnecon 20 Feb 2012 , 10:19am

This has been a mystery to me for years. Diesel is a fundamentally lower quality, cheaper to produce product than petrol. One refining fraction, naphtha, can be blended or reformed into diesel or petrol, so there is an argument that in the winter heating oil season diesel prices could equal, but not exceed, petrol prices at the margin. It is hard to conclude anything other than that the industry is exploiting the greater fuel economy of diesel vehicles to get away with overcharging us.

tux222 20 Feb 2012 , 10:44am

The "Mad Max" peak oil scenario never made any sense (but good movies).

Any sane "peak oil" anaylsis has oil production first reaching a plateau, then falling off over several decades. The effect will be a high oil price with savage peaks when supply fails to meet demand, followed by falls as people adjust their usage (electric or CNG vehicles, nuclear and solar electricity, etc.) . I believe we are now on the plateau. The all-time peak world oil output may already be behind us.

The real revolution has been more in natural gas than oil, and for the world economy this must be somewhat reassuring, especially since the nature of tight gas is that the output of a tight gas well or field falls off slowly, rather than stopping quite abruptly as a conventional gasfield does. This means there will be no "Mad Max" for gas either.

tux222 20 Feb 2012 , 10:57am

The price of diesel is set by supply and demand. A refinery has a limited ability to produce more diesel and less petrol. So if demand for diesel is higher than demand for petrol, diesel will cost more.

It's also worth noting that diesel is still a bargain if you compare price per unit of energy, rather than price per unit volume. A litre of diesel weighs more than a litre of petrol. Its energy content is higher still than the weight comparison suggests. (It also creates more CO2 when burned). Most of the "efficiency" of diesel cars is an illusion created by the fact that fuel is sold and taxed by vollume, rather than by energy or carbon content. BTW I drive a diesel - the saving in the wallet is real enough!

The government ought to consider reforming fuel duty over the next decade, to move gradually to taxation by energy content rather than by volume. Do it gradually, so that oil refineries, car manufacturers and car buyers have plenty of time to adapt.

vinchainsaw 20 Feb 2012 , 11:44am

Johnecon,

Diesel used to be cheaper to produce than petrol, today that is no longer the case and less diesel is yielded from a gallon of crude than petrol, but it is cleaner.

The reason diesel is cheaper than petrol on the continent is due to fuel subsidies there.

To run a vehicle, however, diesel is still cheaper and I personally love my diesel anyway.

tux222 20 Feb 2012 , 12:22pm

Just looked up the exact figures for energy content. Petrol 34.8 MJ/L, Diesel 38.6 MJ/L, difference about 11% so diesel anything less than 11% dearer than petrol is biassed in the driver's favour by the tax system and/or supply and demand factors.

giveusaquid 20 Feb 2012 , 3:54pm

I've always thought it gives a strange impression, a bit like saying you're reaching peak petrol as you get to half a tank. Production can of course increase, just as you could swap your engine for a new one twice the size, but it will no doubt drain the tank a bit quicker. There's always lots of discussion here about timing the peaks and calling the bottom, and the conclusion is usually that there are too many variables to call it, well that applies to our oil use, and we blether on about technicalities whilst ignoring the main headline - it will run out, and in far less time than it has taken us to use the first 'half', the choice is whether we husband those reserves and start extending their lifespan or burn it into the atmosphere as quick as we can.

If anyone wants me I'll be in the soup aisle.

jadeplant 20 Feb 2012 , 4:10pm

The article seems to be working very hard to disbelieve that oil is a finite resource.

LateDeveloper 20 Feb 2012 , 4:21pm

Simple answer to this, is what drives the price of products up, that everyone needs/wants, whilst trying to give a good excuse for justifying those increased prices, without Governments stepping in.
If we could mass produce diamonds or synthesise precious/rare metals, would their prices hold up in the markets. Of course not.
No Government would contradict anyone saying that peak oil was here, since they all have tax revenues on oil.
although in the UK they go OTT. Whilst we are on the point of profiteering, if and when fuel duty comes down will the price of fuel ? doubt it.

Jimi97 20 Feb 2012 , 7:38pm

Most commodities (oil, gold) are not finite resources for practical purposes, but there is only so much that can be extracted at a given price. At $30/brl only the easiest sources of petroleum make much profit, but above $100/brl, all sorts of 'unconventional' sources can be tapped, like tarsands. This really is a classic example of elastic supply and demand: we can have cheap oil, or we can have plentiful oil, but there is no way of having both. It is, however, a really good time if you have a lot of cheaply produced oil you can sell.

GoldenSoldier 20 Feb 2012 , 11:04pm

Peak oil may be delayed, but surely it is inevitable.

I can just imagine somebody in the future saying “It may be difficult to believe but even in the 21st century those barbarians actually burnt precious reserves of oil in their vehicles”

millwall11 21 Feb 2012 , 7:58am

Car fuel prices are an orchestrated rip off but Home Heating Oil prices are even worse and harder to get round ! I've got a wood burner and thats great, but we still need the boiler to get the hot water and basic heat to the underfloor. Yes there are alternatives, but even more expensive and my neighbour has a complicated air/heat exchanger - in the recent cold weather it didn't work and his water pipes froze.

EVsRoll 21 Feb 2012 , 6:06pm

Sure, theres plenty of oil and gas at $3, $4, oh wait $5 per gallon?

Try an EV
http://www.evsroll.com

ThatGuyInTheBack 21 Feb 2012 , 7:07pm

Oil is finite. Produce faster. Run out quicker. It's pretty straightforward in that regard.

The complexity occurs not in an analysis of how much is left, but how energetically and economically profitable it is to get that oil, and how long it can be counted on to maintain a self-sustaining supply chain.

Bottom line? When oil gets too expensive and/or scarce to maintain the activities needed to find, extract, refine and distribute petroleum fuels, we're done with it as a major energy source. It's no longer a self-sustaining phenomenon. The oil crash happens because of negative feedback, not "running out."

merl29 22 Feb 2012 , 10:08pm

quote:
"In 10 years oil will no doubt play a major role in our energy picture, but the grasp it had a decade ago is slowly fading"

That one sentence basicaly has destroyed your whole article on the matter.


In 1999 oil was $10 at one point now it is $100 and could go much higher for all we know, since price is a function of supply and demand then it begs the question: has demand increased or has supply reduced?

It sounds to me like you are saying that 10 years ago demand was higher and production was lower.

You can't have it both ways, if that was the case then the oil price should have been about $1000 a barrel back then and we can say "well we are at $100 now because demand has reduced and production has increased" but it is the exact opposite.

What does that suggest then? well despite increased supply and reduced demand the oil price is going up why...well because scarcity is also a driver of price and value.

BugsMunny 28 Feb 2012 , 7:48pm

"If you haven't noticed, the oil apocalypse has been delayed -- again -- and the doomsday predictors are undoubtedly eating crow while they concoct another mega disaster. "Peak oil," the theory that oil production will soon hit a peak and begin declining, sending the world into an economic disaster, failed to live up to its hype again."

I think you'll find peak production was in 2006 and even if it wasn't we're likely in the plateau phase - it's exactly what you'd expect it to look like - even if you chose to pooh pooh it.

The economic disaster has nothing to do with the fact that (nearly ) 50% of the oil has been produced but the EASY 50% has been. The result is rising prices.

The very significant improvements in our living standards have been supported by essentially free oil - cheaper than water until recently. I suspect you will find that the massive increase in oil price - will have a very significant effect on many lives, if it hasn't already.

Almost my entire share portfolio is in Oil for the last 10 years. I didn't listen to the fools who seem to think that there's an endless supply of oil. And I won't be changing my strategy based on this article.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.