The Cheapest Way To Buy The US

Published in Investing on 8 February 2012

Searching the best ways to invest in America while avoiding huge platform fees.

Everybody's been getting very excited about investing in the US lately. Why? Because its stock market fell around -1% last year. That isn't great, but it was enough to thrash almost every other market in the world.

Investors have been predicting this 'outperformance' will continue in 2012. I'm always nervous when analysts agree, because there is danger in numbers, just as there was a year ago, when everybody was predicting another great year for the BRICs.

That didn't stop me from joining in the fun, arguing that the US could surprise us again in 2012.

The comeback kids

But figures published last week seem to back their case. In January, the US economy grew for the 32nd month, according to a survey by the Institute for Supply Management. There was also great news on jobs, with non-farm payrolls rising by a market-boosting 243,000 jobs, easily beating the consensus expectation of 150,000.

The good jobs news continued this week. On Tuesday, the number of available jobs hit a three-year high of 3.4 million in December, according to The Labor Department.

The US is working.

My quest

The death of the American empire looks like it may have been exaggerated. As I wrote in 2009, America ain't dead yet, and it is slowly returning to health. So I've decided to tip a bit of money America's way. Rather than chasing individual stocks, I want a US fund that I can buy, hold and ignore for the next 20 years.

I don't want an actively managed unit trust because, over 20 years, those charges really stack up. Another drawback is that the fund manager could always move on and be replaced by a duffer.

Plus the US is the most heavily researched market in the world. That makes it very hard for active managers to outperform. Most of them end up trailing trackers.

So I'm looking for a low-cost tracker, exchange traded fund (ETF) or, possibly, an investment trust. I'm hoping you may be able to help.

Ugly is as ugly does

There is one obstacle, and it's a big one. I am investing £1,500 of spare funds held in an ISA managed by Hargreaves Lansdown (HL), which recently introduced an ugly £2 monthly platform fee on low-cost trackers. It claims it was losing money on trackers because the charges didn't cover its admin costs, but it has made life tricky for me

It scuppered my first choice, HSBC American Index, which tracks the S&P 500. It has a total expense ratio (TER) of just 0.25%, almost as low as the much-vaunted Vanguard range of trackers, which charge 0.2%.

But on my £1,500, that £2 monthly fee works out as an annual fee of 1.6%. So I'm actually paying 1.85%. That's scandalous for a tracker, even Virgin doesn't charge that much.

So I switched my attention to L&G US Index, which tracks the FTSE World USA Index and has an annual management charge of 0.65%. Hargreaves Lansdown charges a lower fee of £1 a month for this fund.

This still works out at 1.45% of my £1,500, which is codswallop for a tracker.

In income we trust

I was tempted by investment trust JP Morgan US Equity Income, which targets undervalued, established companies with conservative balance sheets and consistent dividends.

It aims to offer a higher yield than the S&P 500, and currently yields around 2.3%, against around 1.3% on the index. It has an annual management fee of 1.5%, with no HL platform fee.

That's still too high for me, wiping out the benefit of that extra yield. If I wanted to pay 1.5% a year, I'd be looking at unit trusts as well.

Between BlackRock and a hard place

So what about Vanguard US Equity Index? It would be my first choice, if it wasn't for that pesky £2 monthly platform fee. That pushes up my effective TER from a foxy 0.2% to a foul 1.8%

Then I noticed that HL offers BlackRock North American Equity Tracker without any platform fee. It may have a TER of 0.57%, but that will cost me just £8.55 a year. Hargreaves also waives the 5% initial charge on this fund.

So that becomes my first choice, by default.

Aristos R US

I do have another idea up my sleeve, an ETF called the S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats. This tracks the S&P High Yield Dividend Aristocrats Index, which covers the 60 highest-yielding large-cap US companies that have followed a policy of increasing dividends every year for at least 25 consecutive years.

It was only launched in October, but the index was launched in 1999 and has subsequently slaughtered the S&P 500 Index, generating a total return of 146% compared to a drop of -2%.

That looks very tempting. But again, there's that £2 platform fee.

Hargreaves will keep my current ISA funds, because I don't want to pay its exit penalties. But any future money will go elsewhere. So maybe the BlackRock tracker this year, and S&P 500 Dividend Aristocrats with next year's allowance?

Any thoughts?

> Here's your free Essential Investor Kit. Over the next few weeks, you'll get share ideas, a sector report and much, much more. Don't miss out!

More from Harvey Jones:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

OxonianCambion 08 Feb 2012 , 4:02pm

Doesn't HL charge 0.5% for ETFs & shares rather than a platform fee? (I assume the £45 cap is across the board and not per-share.)

I don't use HL but am considering them for their Vanguard Life-strategy fund - having an Alliance Trust ISA for everything else and HL just having that one fund as a core.

I'm getting my US exposure from PSRF (0.39%) and EQQQ (0.3%) though I have exposure from other funds (e.g. NUKP(0.65%) which I bought after the earthquake has 45% in the US.) I did look at USDV as I don't like cap-weighting so much) but I preferred PSRF.

mousecatcher007 08 Feb 2012 , 4:16pm

H-L do indeed charge 0.5% to hold shares and ETFs in an ISA, however there's a cap of £45 (per ISA wrapper rather than per individual holding I hope!). Once the value of your shares and ETFs reaches £9,000 that 0.5% will therefore start to come down, potentially making a cheap ETF more attractive than the 0.57% of Blackrock's North American Equity Tracker fund. I don't think H-L in fact charge a platform fee for the S&P Aristocrats ETF (or indeed for any ETF).

innominato 08 Feb 2012 , 6:36pm

I use HSBC's S&P 500 ETF (HSPX) which has a TER of 0.09%, but with the 0.5% charge it would still be marginally cheaper to go with the BlackRock fund through HL.

Guy5pd 08 Feb 2012 , 7:58pm

I think I'm right in saying that there are two charging structures - the 0.5% charge on stocks, ETFs and unit trusts, capped at £45/year as well as a separate £1/£2 platform fee per holding on those funds (most index trackers, i assume) that do not pay HL commission. The two are independent and therefore can lead to your paying more than £45/year.

Hope that helps,

Guy

Jonesey12 09 Feb 2012 , 8:31am

Gosh, this is complicated. After talking to HL yesterday, I was left with the impression that the platform fee applies to ETFs. I have just called them to double check, and was told it does NOT. Instead, you pay 0.5% inside an Isa, plus the £11.95 dealing fee, plus stamp duty of course. That 0.5% fee is on top of any charges made by the ETF manager but is capped at £45 a year.

Sorry for the confusion, but this is a confusing move by HL.

Harvey

mcecaro 09 Feb 2012 , 8:56am

There is a big lack of US EQUITY INCOME in the UK market ...(available on the LSE at least)

SSGA ETF USDV.LON mentioned above is the one only ....(3.5% yield?)

PSRF yields less than 2 % ....so it is JP IT ....

SSGA launched S&P 400 Mid cap ...but no dividends at all....

anyone out there?

alarmbells 09 Feb 2012 , 9:17am

Why not just buy the darned thing outside H-L?

Or open a Selftrade account?

Or a Halifax sharedeal a/c?

Or write an article on how different platforms charge and which is the best for what type of investment?

As for H-L. I'd rather buy and hold their shares than buy and hold my shares with them!

equitybore 09 Feb 2012 , 9:50am

One sideways option for North America which I hold is Middlefield Canadian Income - around 5.5% based in Channel Islands

mcecaro 09 Feb 2012 , 10:14am

MCT is good...I have bought it for 90p and sold 103p - it raised 8 millions recently....I am waiting new interim to see if dividends are covered or not....and for how much....

OxonianCambion 09 Feb 2012 , 10:44am

One thing I would say is that for ETFs, you don't normally have to pay stamp duty as they are usually based in Ireland or other tax havens. I do say to watch out for witholding fees on dividends if you get Lyxor ETFs though as they are French.

Why H-L? They are the cheapest for Vanguard Life Strategy and personally, I think other brokers will play with their fee structure in time for the RDR and people shuffling stuff about will be livid when they do!

To summarise on HL (to the best of my knowledge):
Most OEICs:
No platform fee, no dealing fee (fund TER around 1.7%, occasionally an Initial Sales charge from the fund)

Cheap OEICs (trackers):
£1pm or £2pm platform fee, no dealing fee (fund TER around 0.3%, no ISCs as far as I'm aware)

Shares
0.5%pa holding fee, £12 dealing fee (x2 if you ever sell!), 0.5% Stamp duty

CEFs (ITs)
0.5%pa holding fee, £12 dealing fee (x2 if you ever sell). 0.5% Stamp duty

ETFs
0.5%pa holding fee, £12 dealing fee (x2 if you ever sell)

The total of all the 0.5%pa fees is capped at £45, though this isn't affected by the platform fee so you could end up paying HL more than that in total.

My personal view is that H-L are great for active funds & Vanguard and a bit pricey for everything else. They seem to have good discount on the fees for active funds. Not having a regular investment scheme for shares is annoying (I like paying £1.50 to buy in my other broker - it is enabling me to build up a portfolio of CEFs and ETFs)

BarrenFluffit 09 Feb 2012 , 10:59am

Another possibility is Edinburgh US Tracker IT. A bit of a relic but might slip under H-L's sights.

sparkyscientist 09 Feb 2012 , 12:39pm

I’m in the process of selling my Fidelity American Fund, which I have in an ISA with HL, then transferring as cash (no penalty charge) to iii, and buying, as innominato suggests above, the HSBC S&P 500 ETF (HSPX). I have seen conflicting reports that the TER is 0.09% or 0.15%. Either way, it’s pretty cheap…

innominato 09 Feb 2012 , 1:27pm

0.09% is the TER quoted on HSBC's website. I think it used to charge 0.15%.

Tykethat 09 Feb 2012 , 3:16pm

Hi Harvey

Be warned about the Blackrock tracker. When I last looked it had a bid offer spread that was not entirely rebated by HL. Inflating its buying cost.

longpod 09 Feb 2012 , 7:20pm

If you are confident that the US market will continue to rise, why not go for either an S&P or DOW ETF which aims to leverage return of either double or even triple the return of the market?

giveaholic 09 Feb 2012 , 7:29pm

TDW doesn't charge anything if you have over 7.5k in your ISA.

WimborneSage 10 Feb 2012 , 1:49pm

Jonesy - a question if I may: I tried finding the S&P 500 Divi Aristocrat ETF on my Halifax Sharebuilder service, but no joy. I rang them and they couldn't find it ... can you clarify ? Is there an ISIN number for the fund ?

All help appreciated.

innominato 10 Feb 2012 , 5:59pm

The ticker is USDV. I can see it through the MF Sharedealing service (though curiously does say that it is eligible within an ISA) so it should be available from the Halifax one.

One word of warning it currently lacks UK Reporting Status so holding outside a tax-free wrapper could leave you liable for income tax on gains rather than CGT.

innominato 10 Feb 2012 , 6:00pm

That should of been not eligible within an ISA.

WimborneSage 11 Feb 2012 , 7:39am

Innominato - much appreciated,thankyou :-)

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.