NHS Hospital With £40m Debt Goes Private

Published in Investing on 1 February 2012

Can Circle reduce debts, increase patient numbers and turn a profit?

Today is the first day of a new era for the NHS -- at least that is what Ali Parsa, former Goldman banker and CEO of AIM-listed Circle Holdings (LSE: CIRC), a private healthcare company, would say.

In November 2011, Circle signed a contract to run Hinchingbrooke Hospital, a NHS district general hospital in Cambridgeshire. The hospital was struggling with £40m of debt and falling patient numbers, and the deal with Circle was to take over the hospital for 10 years, starting in February 2012.

John Lewis for healthcare?

One of Circle's main selling points is that it is 49.9% of it is owned by its employees -- the staff who work in its facilities, which include private hospitals and clinics and an NHS day surgery centre in Nottingham.

At Hinchingbrooke, the staff and assets will remain under NHS control, but staff will be given the opportunity to earn shares in Circle based on their performance and seniority.

Not exactly John Lewis

Parsa likes to stress the similarities with John Lewis, but this is not the whole story. Hinchingbrooke will be run by Circle Health Limited, which is 49.9% owned by Circle Partnership (this is the employee-owned bit) and 51.1% owned by Circle Holdings (this is the listed company).

According to its website, Circle Holdings is 90% owned by investment funds, including Lansdowne Partners and Odey Asset Management, two large Conservative party donors. This has led to a certain level of criticism over the influences at work behind this potentially lucrative 10-year deal.

Is there money in hospitals?

Political controversy aside, is Circle a good investment?

Circle's goal is to move Hinchingbrooke Hospital into profit by increasing patient numbers and thus revenue. Over the 10-year deal, it is estimated that around £1bn of revenue could be involved, so the opportunities are sizeable.

If things go badly at Hinchingbrooke, Circle's maximum liability is capped at £7m, which should limit the potential downside for investors.

Circle only went public in June 2011 and it is forecasting annual losses for at least the next two years. However, its last interim report, which covered the period up to its flotation, showed rises in patient procedure numbers and revenues from existing facilities -- key metrics for Hinchingbrooke.

Investing at this stage is certainly a high-risk strategy, but if the company's growth can be part-funded with large public-sector contracts such as this one, it may offer a lot of potential.

If small-cap stocks like this appeal to you, Circle could certainly be worth a more careful look.

> Here's your free Essential Investor Kit. Over the next few weeks, you'll get share ideas, a sector report and much, much more. Don't miss out!

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

JustWannaBuy 01 Feb 2012 , 11:42am

Not to be confused with Circle housing... Although each companies logo's are very similar...

vinchainsaw 01 Feb 2012 , 12:42pm

Im a bit confused - where does the reveneue come from if it remains NHS?
IS it from gvoernment funding based on patient numbers? If so, I dont foresee this ending well.

sopavest 01 Feb 2012 , 12:59pm

@vinchainsaw:

Funding will continue unchanged as far as I understand it. Circle is running the hospital within the NHS system - so they will get paid for services provided in the same way as other NHS hospitals.

Patients and GPs increasingly choose which hospital to use, so popularity is important. This may go some way to explaining why Circle's main publicised goals are improving nursing care and better catering.

Roland (article author)

BarrenFluffit 01 Feb 2012 , 1:07pm

It will be interesting. They will have to make changes to make it work but within the old framework and frankly labour relations. You can't really give low paid employee's enough shares to make a difference.

vinchainsaw 01 Feb 2012 , 1:45pm

Thanks Roland.

This leads me to my next question - are they not just cannibalising other hospitals then? ie. There are still going to be x number of patients. The only difference now is that there is a private entity that also take a piece of the pie?

Sort of like the way the railways work?

Its an interesting prospect, no doubt about it and many investors have made a lot of money with past privatisations such as the railways and PFI.
These sorts of investments present a bigger moral dilemma to me than big tobacco!

hampshirehog 01 Feb 2012 , 11:15pm

This is an arrangement that shows that, typically, NHS management is not effective or efficient. If a private company can produce management that can dramatically increase productivity then perhaps the Government should get rid of the many failing senior executives currently employed and hire in some new blood. Trusts (a rather ridiculous title) require to be renovated with a completely new make up - no politicians, no public employees, past or present - just experienced and successful business executives, O&M experts and a senior medical advisors.
NHS CEOs must be given notice, improve or out - excuses not accepted.

ram59 02 Feb 2012 , 10:48am

Not to be confused with Circle housing... Although each companies logo's are very similar...
Very true JustWannaBuy.

Also not to be confused with Circle Oil(COP).
Which is an oil & gas exploration company operating in North Africa.

jaizan 02 Feb 2012 , 8:44pm

Of course the NHS management is not efficient.

We have a Soviet style state monopoly for the provision of healthcare. They dictate where the poor taxpayer goes for his treatment & are subjected to no competitive pressure.

Imagine how bad a "National Food Service" or a "National Car Service" would be ? Think of Russian food queues, poor service & Austin Allegros.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.