My Free Research On A Quality Blue Chip

Published in Investing on 25 January 2012

Down 10% last year, this large-cap now looks priced to deliver solid rewards.

Today I want to tell you about one of my favourite blue chips -- and how I found it using what I call my 'no-thesis' approach to buying shares.

Now this approach is quite simple. You see, all I do is just look for straightforward and significant companies where potential share-price gains are not based on complicated stories, convoluted theories or chancy projections.

For example, my no-thesis approach rules me out of shares that have to...

  • reignite sales
  • sustain annual profit growth of 20%-plus
  • reinstate the dividend
  • undergo some sort of debt restructure
  • constantly develop new products
  • wait for the economy to pick up
  • raise margins
  • hope a rival goes bust
  • attract a bidder, or
  • strike oil

... before the share price starts to rise.

Instead, my no-thesis approach looks for companies that can just keep on doing what they've always been doing to deliver solid rewards to patient investors.

Chugging along nicely

As you may expect, my approach draws me to steady, blue-chip businesses. SABMiller (LSE: SAB) and Unilever (LSE: ULVR), for example, are ideal candidates for me, whereby they should be able to sell more drinks and deodorants every year to increase their profits.

With those types of companies, all I have to do is buy them at good-value prices -- to ensure I enjoy decent returns as the firms keep chugging along.

An idea from your cupboard

Now with all the fuss about eurozone debts, the predictability of SAB and Unilever has sadly been recognised by many investors. While the wider market fell last year, the share prices of that pair both reported gains as their earnings and dividends defied the gloom.

However, there is another steady blue chip that I am very keen on right now. Its shares fell 10% last year, but it -- similar to SAB and Unilever -- also sells well-known brands that shoppers buy week in, week out, whatever the economy is doing. Indeed, you probably have some of this large-cap's products in your cupboards right now.

A textbook 'no-thesis' opportunity

I have to admit, this particular large-cap does look like a textbook 'no-thesis' investment. In particular, the financial track record shows impressive progress during the last ten years, while sales, profits and the dividend have advanced commendably during the recession. As such, there is no turnaround, takeover or other long-shot event required to kick-start the share price.

Instead, all what's needed is this business to keep on selling its branded products to ordinary shoppers like you and me. If profits and the dividend can continue to rise at a reasonable pace, then my sums tell me the languishing share price ought to produce a very welcome return to buy-and-hold investors. Indeed, I see the price has already perked up this year.

Here's my free research

Anyway, I've produced a full report about this 'no-thesis' large-cap for you to study at your leisure. The report is free of charge to all ordinary Fools and comes without any further obligation -- you have my word on that. (You can also watch this short video, in which I provide one or two more clues to the large-cap's identity!)

My complementary research on this blue chip can be accessed right here. Good luck, and happy 'no-thesis' investing!

> The Motley Fool owns shares in Unilever.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

UncleEbenezer 25 Jan 2012 , 6:46pm

If you'd made your recommendation in an article I'd have respected you. Even if I thought the tip was rubbish.

But I'm certainly not prepared to jump through gratuitous advertising hoops. And their use speaks of snake-oil.

IDPickering 25 Jan 2012 , 8:23pm

I'm not falling for the bait either, but I guess he's talking about Reckitt Benctiser?

Curvedair 25 Jan 2012 , 9:56pm

Very unimpressed with these tactics. Why not post the "free and without further obligation" report directly...... I won't be following the links

BarneyCowshed 25 Jan 2012 , 10:09pm

Nor me - waste of time - if you want to play 'pass the parcel' become a children's entertainer.

LastChip 26 Jan 2012 , 3:03am

Or me.

As soon as I saw the strings attached - forget it.

Glorious12th 26 Jan 2012 , 6:49am

Waste of my time

A tactic below the usual high standards of TMF

longtermbuynhold 26 Jan 2012 , 7:35am

I thought there should at least be one positive comment for balance, but alas I could not bring myself to do it! .I echo the comments of the above . I am not impressed with how TMF have treated curent subscribers to Dividend Edge and remember the former mutation of Value investor so I remain cynical of any new service that is to come.

sludgesifter 26 Jan 2012 , 9:03am

Too much monkey business for me, too.

vinchainsaw 26 Jan 2012 , 9:10am

No such thing as a free lunch I suppose.

Still not cool though.

atalbot9 26 Jan 2012 , 9:49am

Taking us for fools

ANuvver 26 Jan 2012 , 10:31am

I've got a tip for you, James. Don't try Zumba-style marketing on a community founded on independent thinking.

"I can teach jou to e-spice up jour body!"

Pickering: Has to be Reckitt, doesn't it? Maybe Glaxo at a pinch.

ngata 26 Jan 2012 , 12:53pm

The above contributions demonstrate clearly that you cannot fool all of the fools,even, all of the time.


DrFfybes 26 Jan 2012 , 1:11pm

My first thought was Reckit-B


My second was "I'm not going to cick the link to see"

Highyield100 26 Jan 2012 , 1:20pm

This is a joke.
You are now creating adverts within your e-mails and making them look like the usual articles.
Can you please stop this habit of making links look like adverts or you will loose your readers.

Essentialnvestor 26 Jan 2012 , 1:28pm

Echo the comments here, do not like that at all.

k8r4u 26 Jan 2012 , 1:50pm

My first thought was "what's all the fuss in the comments about ?"

My second thought (having entered CustomerServices@Fool.co.uk as the email address required) was "no idea, interesting report though, thanks !"

Tamilyrn 26 Jan 2012 , 2:09pm

I agree with all the comments - this is shameless promotion and should not be what the Fool is about.

If you had named the stock and linked to ad-bombed research material that would be annoying but acceptable; this was a pure waste of time.

I hope that sometime soon TMF draw a line in the sand with this stuff. I know it's a commercial operation but recent site 'improvements' such as hide articles until you log on are just barriers to content - half the time I don't bother.

Logging on for discussion boards makes sense - logging on to read an article far less so.

kool4kats 26 Jan 2012 , 2:27pm

A cynical ploy hardly designed to win any friends or converts.

BhotiPila 26 Jan 2012 , 2:32pm

Unimpressed. Why did I waste my time reading that?

Was thinking about buying Reckitt Benkiser anyway.

Not pushing the button.

Any more of this and will stop reading TMF links.too.

dpeddlar 26 Jan 2012 , 3:22pm

I have been very impressed with TMF so far, and if I was only allowed one financial website - this would be it. But I will not be clicking on the link and I am very much in agreement with all the comments above.

snoekie 26 Jan 2012 , 3:45pm

I will add my nay to the above list. I get enough junk as it is.

As it is talking about everyday branded products, unlikely to be GSK.......

siriusj 26 Jan 2012 , 4:14pm

I'm being talked down to again..... just like in The Collective!

rober00 26 Jan 2012 , 4:27pm

Rubbish approach and I echo all of the negative points made above.

Interesting no follow up comment or indeed reasurrance from TMF that this despicable method will not be used in the future!!!

aurelian2 26 Jan 2012 , 4:32pm

I agree with everyone above.No more stunts like this please.

richjfool 26 Jan 2012 , 4:34pm

Yes, have to say I don't like it either, particularly when the recommended stock comes straight out of the Dividend Edge portfolio, to which I am a paying subscriber.

JohnofLoders 26 Jan 2012 , 4:49pm

Agreed with all above, not a stunt consistent with the Fools policy. And yes it is RB which has already been tipped earlier this week.

fedupwithbrown 26 Jan 2012 , 5:51pm

This may be the thin ot thicker end of the wedge. I've noticed a shift in TMF over the years, away from . Slowly slowly, but surely. The professional money men are taking over! I already take a lot of what comes out of TMF with a pinch of salt these days having seen some of the stuff they are pushing. I suppose they have to make money some how though. Shame they are becoming just like the rest in this industry!

longpod 26 Jan 2012 , 6:27pm

I agree with the above comments. I had thought of subscribing to Dividend Edge, but I am now beign inundated with so many different offers and services that it is completely baffling. The easy option is now to just keep doing my own thing.

bouleversee 26 Jan 2012 , 6:33pm

I won't be clicking on the link either. RB (which I have held for many years and at one point did quite well) have done precious little of late. Maybe they are due for a rebound but there must be a reason why they have lagged. Could it possibly be that punters are turned off companies which pay their CEOs £9m? I certainly am. It could also have something to do with the phenomenal price they now charge for their products; also a big turn off. In these straitened times, people are turning to cheaper ways of cleaning their houses and equipment and watching out for price promotions.

sippquixote 26 Jan 2012 , 10:07pm

Ridiculous!
Remind me to take any of James Early's recommendations with a large shovel full of salt.

Arkiruthis 26 Jan 2012 , 11:24pm

TMF. This is the sort of thing I expect (and ignore) from MoneyWeek... don't go down this road please.

MrBearBull888 27 Jan 2012 , 11:35am


I'm the first to agree that it is not presented in a good way. But that said how do you think the Fool can provide a free service on the main boards with out trying to Market their paid services? I know III is free as is Morningstar but the free articles on the fool from the various writers is good content for free.

The posters on the main boards are second to none Carmensfella for one but there are lots very high quality posters from the members.

Clearly TMF UK needs to get a better understanding on marketing in the UK but I think some of the comments are a bit OTT.

James Early knows his onions of that I have doubt and he offers free info which you
may or may not like but it's FREE.

James is based in the USA and I really think folks here should give him a chance.

Let me say I have complaints with the Fool. I'm not best pleased that Dividend Edge is closing with out any proper communication to the members. A new service is coming in it's place and can folks blame the Fool UK trying to break even in the UK.

That's right in the last few years they have lost serious money!

Some other firms might have said bye bye. Reading all your posts that what I would say!


Tezza11 27 Jan 2012 , 12:45pm

Grrrrrrrrr!

rober00 27 Jan 2012 , 5:13pm

TMF will not improve its chances of making money in the UK by adopting blatent marketing strategies which insult the intelligence of much of its readership.

It has done the same thing in the past and never seems to learn.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.