6 Key Trends And What They Mean For You

Published in Investing on 25 January 2012

A Fool takes a moment to scan the horizon.

Perhaps the key to successful investing is predicting the future. Sadly, no-one can really foretell the future. But that's not to say there aren't major trends we can spot that influence our investment decisions. In this article, I have identified what I think are six of the most important trends that will take place in the coming years.

1. Emerging markets will continue to grow fast

Why manufacture a product in developed markets when that same product can be made in emerging markets for a fraction of the price? That is the ineluctable logic that has driven the emerging market success story over the past 20 years.

China and India have been growing at a rate of 8-10% a year, with countries like Brazil and Russia not far behind, far outstripping developed markets. What's more, it is thought that this rapid growth will continue for many more years. The World Bank has predicted that China can grow at a rate of 8% a year for the next two decades.

Clearly, if you want a slice of this action, it makes sense to invest a sizeable proportion of your portfolio in emerging markets, or in companies like Unilever (LSE: ULVR) that have substantial operations in these fast-growing markets.

2. The commodities boom will roll on

As emerging markets continue to boom and the world population continues to rise, the demand for commodities such as oil, gas, minerals and food is only going to increase.

People have talked about 'commodity supercycles' and 'peak oil', but, in basic terms, it is all about supply and demand. Demand is rising, and supply simply can't keep up, leading to rocketing commodity prices. This process began in the mid-Noughties, and has a long way to run.

That means that resource companies such as BP (LSE: BP) and Rio Tinto (LSE: RIO) should prove to be sound investments.

3. Developed markets will stagnate

As more and more of the world's money goes into emerging markets, less and less will go into developed markets. Regions such as the US and Western Europe face a future of stagnation, with low growth rates, poor demographics and high unemployment.

Developed world countries are currently up to their eyeballs in debt, and their slow growth will make it harder for them to deleverage. The eurozone debt crisis has made the situation all the worse.

Thus, if you are investing in the UK or other developed countries, you need to look for companies that continue to grow despite the poor macroeconomic picture, for example, SuperGroup (LSE: SGP), or NCC (LSE: NCC).

4. Technological advances will drive change

Technological advances over the past 50 years have been spectacular, and there is no sign that they will relent. Computer processing power will continue to increase by leaps and bounds. Electronic devices from computers and tablets to smartphones and consoles will be ubiquitous, and the internet will become all-pervasive.

People will use the internet for everything, and technology will drive change in industries such as retail, travel and newspapers.

If even Warren Buffett is investing in technology, you can too. Companies like Apple (NASDAQ: AAPL.US) should make good long-term investments.

5. Biotechnology will keep on advancing

Bioscience has entered a golden age. Soon, stem cell technology will be so advanced that whole organs will be created in the lab. Scientists can already synthesise artificial life. A person's genes can be sequenced in an hour.

Current chemical drugs are being replaced by biological drugs (or 'biologics'), which use antibody technology to find their target. As the patents for the current generation of medicines expire, biotechnology is becoming the future for Big Pharma.

Look to invest in leading biotechnology companies such as Amgen (NASDAQ: AMGN.US).

6. We will face a demographic time bomb

Advances in medicine and bioscience will lead to lengthening life spans. It may soon be commonplace for people to live to 100 or more. This will cause a pensions crisis far worse than anything we have experienced so far.

In the long term, the current model of people working until they are 65 and then retiring will have to be scrapped. Instead, we will have a more flexible model where people will need to either put far more money into their pension pot, or will need to work for far longer.

I, and many readers of this website, will already be preparing for this future by investing in our own DIY pensions.

So, do you agree with my predictions, or do you have some of your own? Please share your thoughts in the box below.

> Here's your free Essential Investor Kit. Over the next few weeks, you'll get share ideas, a sector report and much, much more. Don't miss out!

More from Prabhat Sakya:

> Prabhat owns shares in BP and SuperGroup. The Motley Fool owns shares in Unilever.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

GoldenSoldier 26 Jan 2012 , 12:24pm

Yes, on the whole I do agree. However I am not convinced we will need to work longer. I just think we will become more efficient.

sageofyork 26 Jan 2012 , 12:43pm

I agree.

Smaller government will be a necessity, current tax take of 50% which is then spent inefficiently is unsustainable as can be seen. A gradual move to individuals taking greater responsibility for themselves and their families is overdue.

carloswhizz 26 Jan 2012 , 1:27pm

@ sageofyork

Agreed. But with sustainable employment for lower level work now difficult to get, governments at peace with with regular high unemployment and more international competition how will Joe Bloggs or his/her less skilled siblings look after their families? Will we have more slums, a return to the 1910s or copy the Chinese with a one party state or one child policy?

fishbonestephen 26 Jan 2012 , 1:28pm

I agre
Until Europe lowers taxation in a massive way, which is now impossible looking at government debts, we will not move forward in any way for at least a decade. House prices will slowly fall, real spending power will fall, this is the way it is, it seems we are very close to communism as governments take all the money and give back in benefits...so much for democracy !!!

Blackboar 26 Jan 2012 , 3:02pm

Perhaps we could have some examples of these low taxation nirvana's where everyone is well fed clothed and has a good standard of living. Easy to say, not so easy to achieve.

ChaircatMidge 26 Jan 2012 , 3:52pm

I am not so sure about gloom and doom for the US and Europe in the long term.

Nor am I sure about ever-increasing longevity, judging by what seems to be the increasing numbers of enormously fat parents and their equally wide offspring observed by my Servant waddling in and out of the supermarket. I would not be at all surprised if life expectancy begins to drop off in the not too distant future.

Invest2bBlessed 26 Jan 2012 , 4:00pm

@Blackboar - one example is Switzerland. Being married with children my tax rate is about 10%, plus add an extra 5% in that we have to pay our own health insurance costs.

In general "everyone is well fed clothed and has a good standard of living". Education is excellent, and government finances are in surplus.

It can be done.

snoekie 26 Jan 2012 , 4:05pm

I tend to agree fishbone, but whilst the is a prevalence of the state spoon feeding the masses there will be no reduction of taxation.

Just think about the carbon tax and now the tobin tax, they are coming up with ever new ways to acquire finance to urinate down the nearest drain, rather than a degree of 'reverse' compulsion to spur people to work to support themselves for now and later.

In days of old, I mean thousands of years ago, unless you were prepared to hunt or plough the field or harvest the crop, you didn't share in the proceeds.

There is a lot to be said for necessity being the mother of all invention.......

fishbonestephen 26 Jan 2012 , 4:52pm

Blackboar, Invest2bBlessed I think has just covered that question. By the time a worker has bought a car fed, watered, clothed etc etc on minimum wage the incentive is to stop work and claim. The answer is to massively drop tax levels, making work pay.But as I said you just can't stop the democratically elected fools spending the money...HS2, Thames estuary airport, Olympic games..the list is never ending folly.

LARFIELD 26 Jan 2012 , 5:07pm

Some taxation is essential as it is needed to provide: infrastructure, security, the justice system, education, health & facilitate the general oportunity to improve one's life. Taxes raised & applied on a society wide basis gives the potential for economies of scale - set against which are the inevitable inefficiencies which come with spending someione else' money.
All other tax is socialism & needs to be voted for at the ballot box.
What most people find hard to stomach is when Governments move outside these (generally agreed) spheres of operation.

sageofyork 26 Jan 2012 , 6:43pm

LARFIELD _ I was not arguing for no tax, but let us make a start by gradually reducing tax and introducing an initial low charge for visiting say the doctor or hospital as in Australia France and most of the world. There could also be a daily charge for schooling.Doing this gradually over say 20 years will put people back in control. Remaining as we are is just not an option.

dubre 26 Jan 2012 , 8:15pm

Taxation is needed for such as justice & health etc.Fair enough.However,& taking just two examples:-

1, ask anybody who has been on jury service about the huge amount of time & money that is wasted &
2. the large & unecessarily generous GP remuneration-& for others in the health service.If you doubt it try a few international comparisons.

A charge for school & doctor visits could save a fortune.Paying for optional services in a free society would bring on loads of redundancies?--or free up money for other things.

TomJefs 26 Jan 2012 , 8:26pm

Tech is so disruptive I doubt Apple will be relevant at all in 20 years. Take Kodak as an example.

sippquixote 26 Jan 2012 , 9:57pm

Following on from sageofyork's proposal to charge for schooling:

As taxpayers we already pay for the schools to be open. Much better to charge the parents a daily charge for non attendance of pupils. Then we know our taxes aren't being wasted.

giveusaquid 27 Jan 2012 , 1:21pm

Although as a saver I want to see growth for my finances, the wider idea of so called steady growth in all things terrifies me. Take a look at the presentations of this man:

http://www.albartlett.org/presentations/arithmetic_population_energy_video1.html

No scaremongering or doomsaying but some very interesting facts. Taxation may well be the least of our worries.

fishbonestephen 28 Jan 2012 , 12:02pm

Hi giveusaquid, just watched the video, I think most of us realise the population problem, this video just spells it out!. We just keep paying for more people to have kids, never understood this. Living in RSA for many years and seeing inflation at 12% for many years , I understood that this is exponential and will eventually wipe us out financially. I am now in the UK and am seeing a similar trend. Whats the answer?

giveusaquid 31 Jan 2012 , 2:09pm

I wish I knew fishbonestephen, the flippant answer is to stop having so many children. I'm no economist although I sometimes wonder why we worry so much about growth - all I really want is steady and secure. If salaries rise and bills/cost of income rises at a similar rate surely that is not really growth anyway? It's too much for my brain anyway - my personal answer is to live further and further within my means, as simple as I can make it for myself to understand: aside from growth/inflation and debts that will hopefully be paid off I want to aim for saving half my salary. If I can do this I can effectively retire for as many years as I've saved for, if that makes sense.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.