The Big Share Winners Are Still Out There

Published in Investing on 16 December 2011

Even with trouble on the horizon, companies can still produce wonderful gains.

Now you may already know this, but the more I study the stock market, the more I realise big share winners can come in all sorts of shapes and sizes...

...and the more I believe trying to gauge the economy, the euro and other 'top-down' hot topics might just paralyse my portfolio and create zero-return inaction.

Five-year flashback

Take a trip back to the end of 2006. It was a time when the FTSE 100 traded at 6,220 and the headlines had yet to be filled with sub-prime American mortgages, let alone Northern Rock, Lehman Brothers, Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS), Greece and the current eurozone mess.

A major crash was about to start -- not that many people really foresaw the FTSE free-falling towards 3,500 -- and even now, the market remains about 13% lower five years on.

On the face of it, the end of 2006 was one of the worst times to commit to long-term investing, especially when amateurs such as me were even sensing trouble looming for builders, banks and buy-to-let.

But when I actually checked the facts, I was surprised to discover the handsome share-buying opportunities that existed five years ago.

100% capital gains

You see, of the 573 shares currently in the FTSE All-Share that were trading at the end of 2006, some 225 (39%) have since delivered a capital gain. I think that's quite a healthy proportion, especially given the market turmoil we all suffered in the meantime.

But more importantly, almost 80 of those 225 names generated worthwhile 10% average annual gains, while almost 40 produced 15% average annual gains or more -- that is, they doubled your money or more during those turbulent five years.

These names may surprise you

Now you may already know where some of the really big winners since 2006 have emerged from. Buoyed by the price of gold, miners such as Rangold Resources (LSE: RRS) and Centamin Egypt (LSE: CEY) have, for example, delivered 20%-plus average annual returns during the last five years.

Many other resources shares have reported 20%-plus annual returns, too, including Tullow Oil (LSE: TLW) and Antofagasta (LSE: ANTO). Meanwhile, high-profile techs, ARM (LSE: ARM) and Imagination Technologies (LSE: IMG), have registered amazing 34% average annual gains.

But here are some of the more surprising names on my five-year leaderboard:

ShareAverage annual return
Lancashire (LSE: LRE)29%
Carclo (LSE: CAR)26%
Rightmove (LSE: RMV)25%
Croda (LSE: CRDA)24%
Senior (LSE: SNR)21%
Stagecoach (LSE: SGC)20%
British American Tobacco (LSE: BATS)16%
Devro (LSE: DVO)16%
AG Barr (LSE: BAG)16%
JD Sports Fashion (LSE: JD)15%

I must admit I had to double-check some of these companies to discover what they actually do.

Just in case you don't know either, Lancashire is a Lloyds catastrophe insurer, Carclo is a technical plastics group, Croda develops speciality chemicals, Senior makes components for the aerospace industry, Devro produces sausage skins and AG Barr sells Irn Bru.

Anyway, I doubt these six names looked obvious winners five years ago, and I dare say Rightmove and its exposure to property, Stagecoach and its low-growth transport operations, BAT and its low-growth tobacco business, and JD Sports and its exposure to the fickle high street, did not look stand-out buys either.

Yet they all provided 15%-plus average annual gains during a pretty rough five years for the FTSE.

Buying distraction

While the banking crash caused many companies to fail, it's clear many businesses actually did well during the recession -- and their shares responded accordingly. And those winners came from both high-growth and low-growth sectors of the market.

Looking at that table -- as well as considering all the other shares that trounced the All-Share during the last five years -- I'm now convinced spending too much time debating the ongoing financial crisis, the fate of the euro, the death of the high street -- and all the other top-down concerns -- is just going to distract us from pinpointing the very best share-buying opportunities for the next five years.

Ever the optimist

True, better buying opportunities may occur between now and 2017, but then again, maybe they won't. Nobody knows for sure, and simply sitting in cash waiting for the uncertainty to clear will never find us the really great wealth-creating bargains.

So if you're an optimist like me, all we can do is to remember how shares such as Rangold, ARM and Rightmove have prospered during this downturn -- and how buying decent companies at cheap prices today could see similar returns in the future. Despite everybody predicting further doom and gloom, the big share winners are still out there... ready to be bought today.

> The Fool's latest report has just been published! Make sure you don't miss '10 Steps to Making a Million' -- it's free!

More on the markets, shares and the economy:

> The Motley Fool owns shares in Imagination Technologies.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

UncleEbenezer 16 Dec 2011 , 1:21pm

Nice list for visitors with a time machine. But you forgot to tell us the next five years' winners!

Go on! You know you want to!

Tykethat 19 Dec 2011 , 5:36pm

It would appear looking forward is slightly trickier than the rear view mirror!

pickepics 19 Dec 2011 , 11:01pm

Thank you, Maynard, for something positive on MF! There are so many web sites out there offering free share sifting utilities and those value shares are certainly there for those people willing to make the effort to find them. There are lots of places including MF with tips on what to look for by way of income, assets, free cash flow, debt, hidden debt, spread of shareholdings and so on and so on, plus how to assess them you certainly don't need to be an expert before you start.

TMFMayn 20 Dec 2011 , 9:44am

But you forgot to tell us the next five years' winners!
They're somewhere in here I hope.
http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/2011/11/28/a-very-foolish-fools-own-portfolio.aspx

goodlifer 20 Dec 2011 , 8:45pm

"On the face of it, the end of 2006 was one of the worst times to commit to long-term investing,"

Why?
I would have thought it one of the best.

For reasons I can'[t remember I wasn't interested the Game till 2008, when it was obvious to the meanest intelligence that it was a buyers' market.

Wasn't just as obvious in 2006?

TMFMayn 04 Jan 2012 , 1:08pm

Hello goodlifer,

Wasn't just as obvious in 2006?

Well, as I wrote in the text, the FTSE was 6,220 at the end of 2006 and the crash of 2008 saw the index fall towards 3,500. So in terms of committing -- ie actually buying -- into long-term investing, the end of 2006 wasn't a great time. Better to have bought during 2008 as you say.

Mayn

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.