Britain's Blue Chips Go On Sale

Published in Investing on 28 July 2011

London's flagship index is trading on less than ten times earnings.

Remember the market turmoil of 2008 and 2009? When the FTSE slid by 48%, and naked fear stalked the streets?

I thought so. But I've news for you. Shares today are cheaper than they were back then.

That's right: Britain's blue chips are cheaper than they were this time last year, cheaper than they were this time in 2009, and cheaper than they were this time in 2008.

And while that July-to-July comparison doesn't quite capture the market low of 3 March 2009, when the FTSE 100 closed at 3,512, it still flags up a mouth-watering buying opportunity. See for yourself:

 27 Jul 1127 Jul 1027 Jul 0928 Jul 08
FTSE 100 P/E9.916.010.710.5

What's going on?

Clearly, despite the falls of the last week or so, we're a long way away from 2009's low of 3512, when the market's P/E stood at just 7. Even so, a P/E of under 10 is 40% cheaper than last year, and isn't to be sniffed at. So why are shares so cheap?

The answer lies on the earnings side of the ratio. As Cliff D'Arcy wrote a few days ago, according to the latest Capita Registrars Dividend Monitor Report, dividends are running at a three-year high, up by 27% in the second quarter of 2010.

What's more, as Todd Wenning, lead analyst on the Fool's Dividend Edge investing service notes, "Those companies increasing dividends now outnumber those cutting dividends by a 6.5‑to‑1 margin ‑‑ a record high since Capita Registrars has been keeping score."

And Fool poster McEssex, a fund manager in real life, has noted that forecast dividends over the next twelve months are the highest that they have been for four years.

"The opportunity cost has never been lower," he writes. "Interest rates are 0.5% now, and were about 5% four years ago. On this data, the market has a prospective yield of 4%."

What to buy?

Today's P/E of just under 10 is of course the average of the whole FTSE 100. Individual shares can be much cheaper -- much, much cheaper in some cases. And these are FTSE 100 blue chips, remember, not AIM-listed minnows.

To my mind, fellow Fool writer David Holding did a pretty good job of unearthing the biggest bargains, identifying shares trading on a P/E of 7 or less.

That P/E of 7, you'll recall, was what the market dipped to on 3 March 2009 -- meaning that here were blue chips that you could still buy at fire-sale prices.

From David's list, I've pulled out my own four favourites, each of which I hold in my own portfolio.

CompanyForecast
P/E
AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN)6.9
Aviva (LSE: AV)6.8
BAE Systems (LSE: BA)6.9
BP (LSE: BP)5.9

Buy now, not later

Right now, investors are nervous. There's a lot of red ink around, and the combination of sovereign debt worries in Europe and budget deficits in America has propelled markets sharply downwards.

Which is exactly what helps to make shares a buy, of course.

In short, the time to buy is now, not when markets have recovered.

More from Malcolm Wheatley:

> Malcolm holds shares in AstraZeneca, Aviva, BAE Systems and BP. The Motley Fool holds shares in AstraZeneca and BAE Systems.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

motamad 28 Jul 2011 , 4:02pm

Interesting... shares might be a lot cheaper but does this bode well for investors in the long run? I'm not surprised Investors are nervous - I would be too if a firm's net worth had dropped as low as this. Even if a firm was to do well it would be a long time before you saw an real return on investment.

Prof103 28 Jul 2011 , 4:12pm

Read the small print. The FTSE 100 is cheap on the basis of forecast earnings.

On a cyclically adjusted 10 year past earnings, the FTSE is expensive.

Take your pick.

P103

ANuvver 29 Jul 2011 , 12:46am

"On a cyclically adjusted 10 year past earnings, the FTSE is expensive."

Er, well it would be, wouldn't it?

Fingered 29 Jul 2011 , 2:11am

Mr Market really doesn't give a damn about P/E ratios. :-) Go ahead though....knock yourself out analysing this ratio.

MunroMan 29 Jul 2011 , 9:36am

In stock market terms the past is irrelevant.

Much more important is stuff like the £2b special dividend from Vodafone in February next year.

CanaryCoaster 29 Jul 2011 , 12:35pm

hi guys i'm no idiot but i am finding some of these posts rather obtuse, to the point of being confusing. i love irony but it would be much more useful to the wider community Prof103 and ANNuvver if you could consider that your audience is much wider than 2 people. Fingered thanks for the reference i'm reading with great interest now.

I must say having missed the boat in 2008 i am keen to invest at times like today when stocks are historically cheap and dividends are high. once the share has 'yielded', this removes the advantage, as i understand it. please feel free to correct me!

pharmaspecialist 29 Jul 2011 , 3:02pm

One alternative to the index tracker would be to exploit the long term superior gains of microcap companies. The work of Elroy & Dimson has shown that microcaps have significantly outperformed all other sizes of companies over the past 100 years so this seems like a reliable effect. The problem is that there is no FTSE Fledgling Index fund but the Marlborough Microcap Unit Trust managed by Giles Hargreave is a good proxy and the increased charges compared to a tracker should be more than compensated by the microcap outperformance. Lack of global exposure should not be a problem as the microcap effect is present in all the major markets. Of course, this strategy will stop working if alot of people use it as the microcap sector is limited in size, but my perception is that relatively few investors are aware of this approach and microcaps remain good value compared to the long term past. I would avoid the Henderson Fledgling Investment Trust because of the recent change in management.

pharmaspecialist 29 Jul 2011 , 3:04pm

Sorry, the above comment should be filed under the "My 3 Pick for the Long Term" article, not the above article.

ANuvver 29 Jul 2011 , 6:52pm

@CanaryCoaster

Sorry if the above post seemed a bit snipey. My sympathies over 2008 - I missed some cracking opportunities just three weeks ago and I'm annoyed about it.

I like fishing for bargains in a fearful environment, so Monday will be a very interesting day. I would also add that, if you're looking to get into a few US stocks, the current dollar rate does present an opportunity. The effect of a temporarily weakening dollar on commodities is also something to ponder. As always, IMHO.

If you're looking for income stocks, responsible management and a proven progressive dividend policy should be major factors. In this context, quite a lot of people prefer to nip a bit off the price by deliberately buying ex-div.

ANuvver 29 Jul 2011 , 7:00pm

@LordEssex

The Verizon effect on Voda has been there for all to see for ages now. Sounds like you were in - I was too. Cheers!

Now we'll sit and watch the "falling tide lowering all boats", eh?

Francisco23 29 Jul 2011 , 8:20pm

Hmm, a low P/e = bargain share prices?!

This is out of context analysis, too often a feature of TMF articles. Also would suggest this is borderline irresponsible churnalism.

The only response is, Japan.

"The time to buy is now" - poppycock!

The time to buy is when the trend in share prices has turned the corner.

That a fall off in earnings, will correct the so-called P/e indicator that leads to this author to shout "buy now" does not enter the mind of the author.

Do not follow this advice if you want to protect your capital.

Truly irresponsible.

Brockasaurus 29 Jul 2011 , 10:12pm

@Francisco23
"The time to buy is when the trend in share prices has turned the corner."

Is that not like saying "the horse to back is the horse that's going to win"?

etlbajb 31 Jul 2011 , 6:52am

As only an occasional reader of these posts --- but well experienced and academically qualified --- i find virtually every posting obtuse in the extreme !! For example ... who exactly does Francisco think is reading his views ---just his own "in-crowd" ?

Prof103 31 Jul 2011 , 10:15am

Forgive my earlier post being so cryptic.

The point I am making is that on the basis of cyclically adjusted earnings over the last 10 years, the S & P 500 has a P/E ratio of over 20 which is historically expensive.
The S & P 500 has also doubled in price since the low of March 2009. Although I myself invest in the FTSE, I focus on the S & P 500 since the FTSE invariably follows it. The current spate of US company earning results reveals higher pressure on earnings from increased commody prices that cannot be passed on to indebted consumers. So I see this as completely out of sync with the optimistic forecast earnings referred to in the article.

Whether US or Euro budget concerns will trigger a market correction, I have no idea and in a way it is not relevant. What is relevant is that markets eventually revert to mean on some trigger or other.

P103

john10001 01 Aug 2011 , 7:16pm

A lot of people may be kicking themselves in the near future for not listening to this excellent advice.

Since last April (2010) and the Deep Water Horizon disaster I've been adding more and more BP to my portfolio. It is unbelievably cheap and excellent value.

A lot of people panic sold thinking things were a lot worse than they were at the time. As bad as it was people just didn't understand the colossal size of BP and how they were the only ones capable of fixing the problems of which constitute a drop in the ocean to them.

I disagree with the views expressed that we could be stagnant for a lengthy period of time (Japan situation). We could just as easily see the markets roar back to life at any point in the very near future and while everyone else is being cautious and nervous it's the investors who are taking risks now who will benefit. Speaking of Japan, if you also want to find excellent companies with great value stock at the moment definitely look to Japan as well as big blue chips at home and in the States.

Like Warren Buffet constantly says; "you have to be greedy when others are fearful, and fearful when others are greedy". So true.

MAACPRIME 01 Aug 2011 , 10:01pm

There has been a change of ownership at the Henderson (Gartmore) Fledgling Trust but the manager is the same guy who was managing the fund with Gervais Williams for years. It's an index fund anyway so I doubt the management style has much scope for flexibility (cock-ups).

elliot321 02 Aug 2011 , 10:35am

I feel that the markets have still further to fall. I'm basing my feelings on Italy weighing ever more heavily on the Eurozone in the coming weeks and causing great concern to investors and driving the markets still lower. When i sense credible answers to the Eurozone crisis then I will invest again.

Fingered 03 Aug 2011 , 12:14am

@Malcolm......ooops-a-daisy........... :-)

ANuvver 03 Aug 2011 , 6:15pm

Um. Timing an article must be at least as difficult as timing markets...

Likewise...... :-)

A propos nothing much - my favourite crawl headline from Bloomberg this morning: "Minister urges Londoners to walk to work during Olympics". My response: "Enter the hop, skip and **** off event, sir".

Fingered 04 Aug 2011 , 9:50pm

On a positive note: - Regarding the recent stock market collapse, the gap between the wealthy and poor became narrower. :-)

ANuvver 05 Aug 2011 , 2:47am

Oh yes, I've come over all socialist all of a sudden...

The word "correction" starts to assume its penal connotations. Thankfully I've got at least some cash stuffed in my gold underpants.

Damn, there I go again, lowering the tone.

So presumably Asia takes a kick up the whatsits overnight, then a bit of a wait for the Euro markets to shuffle around digesting risk appetite until the US issues "wotevah" job figures.

Courage, mes braves!

BlahBlahDoh 05 Aug 2011 , 3:03am

28 July "buy now, not later" - are you Michael Fish in disguise?

Fingered 05 Aug 2011 , 5:49am

That drop ignored a raft of support stops.........there's a daisy-a-oops lurking soon me finks .........

ANuvver 06 Aug 2011 , 2:20am

Interesting thought Fingered. I wonder if some of those who might have preferred to stay in got stopped out and then suddenly found themselves scrambling for a bolthole. Could be a distortionary factor.

I note with disgust that the US banks are now starting to charge for holding "excessive" cash balances...

Any betting that "value vigilantes" will start shoring things up a little come Monday?

JimDiGritz 06 Aug 2011 , 11:12am

Sorry. Is this the same Malcolm Wheatley who made the case against gold in 2009

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/investing-strategy/2009/05/19/the-case-against-gold.aspx?source=isesitlnk0000001&mrr=0.11

Oh, and I see that if you followed this recent gem of advice you would have lost over 11% of your investment.

A true contrarian indicator.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.