Whose Risk Is It Anyway?

Published in Investing on 13 July 2011

Don't take all the pain for none of the pleasure.

Two articles grabbed my attention here on The Fool recently: Harvey Jones' article Risk Is A Four Letter Word, and Alan Oscroft's article Why Do We Listen To Experts? In this article I'd like to pick up the baton by following up with the question "Whose Risk Is It Anyway?".

Attitude to risk

Whenever you sit down with a financial advisor, the first thing they do is to carry out a "risk assessment" to find out what your risk tolerance is. Rightly or wrongly, the sceptic in me reads between the lines to reach the following conclusions:

  • If your 'investment' generates pitiful returns, the advisor will tell you that it is your own fault for choosing the "low risk" option.

  • If the value of your investment falls substantially, then, well, you did say you had a high risk tolerance didn't you?

Heads -- they win! Tails -- you lose!

Whenever I sit down with a financial advisor -- which I never do, because I won't let them near me -- my stock answer to the "attitude to risk" question is: "It depends who is taking the risk".

I have quite a high risk tolerance when I am taking the risk myself; witness my spread betting, although it need not be as risky as it is often portrayed to be.  However, I have an ultra-low risk tolerance when someone else is taking the risk on my behalf. 

Despite the numerous qualifications that our advisers boast, I have one qualification that they don't have. I care about my own money! So even when 'risking' it, I like to be in control of my risk.

The illusion of control

When driving my own car, I may be prone to pushing the boundaries a little. Nothing illegal, you understand. And I'm comfortable doing so because I know what a great driver I am.

When I jump aboard one of those National Express coaches, I don't care how good the driver thinks he is. I just want him to drive safely.

Some financial authors describe this as "the illusion of control" and point out that none of us is as good a driver as we think we are, so we might as well leave it up to the professionals.

Looking to buy and sell shares online?

If you're looking to trade shares online -- then look no further than The Motley Fool's
very own Share Dealing Service. Our execution only service lets you trade
UK shares for just £10, or international shares for just £17.50.

Free transfer from your current broker* -- No annual fees -- Free investor support tools

Click here to find out more or to open an account

 

The value of your investments and the income from them can go down as well as up. You may not get back the full amount you have invested. Foreign currency conversions are required to facilitate the settlement of international transactions and include a spread, which can vary from time to time, applied to the available exchange rate. *Your current broker may charge you for leaving their service. Please contact them directly for details of any exit fees.

The blame game

Many investors do leave it up to the professionals, and here's why:

  • If their investments perform well, they can congratulate themselves on a good choice of advisor.

  • If their investments perform badly, they can console themselves with the thought that it wasn't really their fault -- because they were given "bad advice".

Most people would rather blame someone else than themselves, and relying on someone else's advice is a handy way of doing this. Wake up, folks! When risking you own money, then -- unless there is some fraud involved -- you only have yourselves to blame for the end result. If you want to pat yourselves on the back when it all goes well, you also need to take the blame (and pain) when it all goes wrong.

All the pain, and none of the pleasure

When you drive fast, do a bungee jump, or whatever, you are willing to take the pain (if things go wrong) in exchange for the pleasure you get from taking the risk.

This gives us a problem if we are to take the pain for our investment decisions, because we may not actually be getting the pleasure from the "high risk" assets we're invested in. 

Entrusting your investment money to a third party manager is like giving him a bag load of money to take to Las Vegas, paying for his hotel and other 'expenses', and asking him to report back to you on how he did. He gets all the pleasure from rolling those dice, and (whether you like it or not) you take all the pain for opting for his 'high risk' strategy.

You know what? I can lose my own money just as effectively as the professionals can; so I might as well have the fun in the casino myself -- and enjoy the complementary sandwiches. Or forget about fast cars and bungees jumps altogether, and just play it safe with the National Savings.

Do It Yourself

It's your money that you're risking.

If you want to risk it, go have some fun and don't pay someone else to have the fun for you. If you want to play safe, do you really need to pay for expert advice on where to secure your consequent low return?

More from Tony Loton:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

mcturra2000 13 Jul 2011 , 9:45am

My problem is that I think that investment "professional advisors" are little more than salesmen. I would rather give my money to my mum to manage, than listen to anything they've got to say. Actually, I think my mum would be a very good investor.

Unless these advisors actually run their own portfolios, and done so successfully, why should I listen to them?

offthelip2010 13 Jul 2011 , 4:43pm

Spot on Tony, I couldn't agree more!!

rober00 13 Jul 2011 , 4:56pm

Good Stuff Tony!!!

The only professional advisors I have met were at investment events I have attended. None left me impressed with their ability to manage my invetments better than me.

DIYIncome 13 Jul 2011 , 5:09pm

Absolutely agree... of course (but then the clue is in the name)

growingmyown 13 Jul 2011 , 6:45pm

Personally, I think the 'tolerance to risk' questions may be just a psychological cushion to convince the unwitting punter that their needs are being taken into account.

I do wonder how the products sold would be different depending on different answers being given to the 'tolerance to risk questions'.

I don't know for sure but I'd sure like to find out.

Growing my own.
http://growmyownmoney.blogspot.com/

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.