How To Make A Million

Published in Investing on 4 May 2011

Twelve millionaire private investors reveal their secrets.

Books that focus on UK investors are relatively rare, so Guy Thomas's Free Capital should be well received. 

Indeed, he has comfortably exceeded his goal of writing a 'journalistic profile of the working lives of a few full-time investors' by including regular, well researched and presented sections to explain some of the more esoteric terms and techniques used by the twelve private investors profiled in the book.

Through the window

It's natural for any active private investor to be curious about the lives and techniques of those that have succeeded in a big way, and on that count, this book doesn't disappoint. It describes itself as a window into the world of twelve highly successful private investors who have accumulated £1m or more from investing -- in most cases, considerably more with typical compounded returns of around 30% a year.

They remain anonymous apart from the well-known Peter Gyllenhammar who often has notifiable interests in smaller companies, and John Lee, the Liberal Democrat peer, who is known for his investment writings in the Financial Times, and his former activities as a Tory MP and minister. However, a few of the twelve post on our discussion boards, so some of our regulars may well be able to guess their identities.

All twelve have made their investment fortunes in their own unique way. Indeed, there are multiple methods, lifestyles, education levels and personalities featured in the book, which is organised into separate chapters for each investor. At the end of each chapter, a useful summary box that features the insights and advice that can be gleaned from each investor's story is included.

Seeing things the same

However, there are similarities, and despite their many differences, the twelve have the following in common according to the book's conclusion section:

1. A future time perspective

From an early age, these investors were focussed on saving, earning and investing money for the future.

2. No overnight success

Most had a long period of largely lacklustre investing before achieving outstanding results.

3. Using money to facilitate freedom rather than consumption

Most appear to live modest lifestyles relative to their wealth.

4. Low appetite for leverage

The returns have generally not been achieved with the use of excessive leverage such as that available on spread betting accounts.

5. Concentrated portfolios

Most have concentrated portfolios with a small number of shares, or most of their funds in a select few shares, within a larger overall portfolio.

6. Smaller companies

Most invest in smaller companies and rarely hold shares in FTSE 350 companies.

7. Independence

All work largely alone and rarely take advice from others.

Seeing things differently

Individually, the investors provide some useful insights to help illuminate the strategies that have proven to be so successful for them. 

For example, Luke, who is described as a top-down investor holding a very concentrated portfolio, advises 'pick the right train' by looking for fields of investment with long-term secular growth. He suggests concentrating on the quality rather than the quantity of decisions and to 'stick with your best ideas', which is precisely what he has done by riding Soco International (LSE: SIA), multiplying his capital 42 times over a ten-year period. That could be why he's 'happy doing nothing' rather than being an active trader.

This advice chimes with Nigel's approach, which is to anticipate cyclical markets using market psychology and fundamentals. He says that 'everyone is a genius in a bull market -- so find a bull market!' For Nigel, that means looking for markets in a cyclical upswing; however, he differs from Luke by advising 'sell half when a stock doubles'.

In contrast, Vernon is described as a contrarian who buys growth companies that have stumbled several times. He tries to 'buy the glitch', in other words, to take advantage of profit warnings, demotions from indices and other temporary problems that render the shares unpopular and cheap compared to the value of the underlying business. The trick is to identify those companies with truly temporary setbacks and not those with more enduring problems, so that the investor may ride the recovery.

Other investment styles feature too, like activists who like to mix it with company managements; networkers who love to attend AGMs and badger directors on the phone; esoteric investors with specialist niches and one successful day-trader. 

Soap

As well as investment styles, this book provides insight into these investors' daily lives and there is great variety there, as well. I'll let you form your own conclusions on that aspect by reading the book!

Overall, Guy Thomas has provided us with something of a future investment classic in my view, which may help to motivate, ground and focus the reader at the same time; I heartily recommend it. It's also worth visiting Guy's blog for more investing wisdom.

More from Kevin Godbold:

> Kevin owns shares in Soco.

> You can buy Free Capital and other investing titles at the Fool bookshop

> Your tax-free ISA allowance has now increased to £10,680. Open a Motley Fool Self Select ISA today.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

TMFBoing 04 May 2011 , 10:33am

Ah, a well-timed article - my copy of the book just arrived today

Cheers,
Alan

BarrenFluffit 04 May 2011 , 8:24pm

Wow, he found a millionaire daytrader ;)

AleisterCrowley 05 May 2011 , 11:14am

Interesting as these studies are, I'm always worried about 'survivor bias'

Take a group of risk-taking small cap investors and, compared with investors as a whole, you'll probably find the most millionaires - and also the most bankrupts.

F958B 05 May 2011 , 2:07pm

The markets have done very well for me (to the point of considering very early retirement), although I have not managed to generate *millions* in profits, unlike those skilled or fortunate dozen mentioned above.
However, I will comment on the bullet points listed by the author of this article:

1. A future time perspective
Yes, get that compounding working early on. The fire burns hottest after it has been well-fuelled and well-stoked.

2. No overnight success
A little knowledge is worse than none, since many novices vastly overestimate their ability. Investing is a skill which requires time to master. Different personalities will prefer different investment styles and therefore may not do well following what others suggest.

3. Using money to facilitate freedom rather than consumption
Reinvesting as much profit as possible keeps fuelling the fire. Keeping spending down to sensible levels in the early years allows greater returns from a greater investment pool in the later years.

4. Low appetite for leverage
This is where I might disagree to some extent. In some instances - such as the current low-interest-rate environment - borrowing to invest can be vastly profitable *if deployed at the correct time* (which is not right now, with QE2 about to be phased out!).
Companies often buy each other with debt and often fund expansion with debt. Many companies have high debts, but continue to generate good profits.
The Fed's announcement of QE2 ("money printing") last summer was a licence to speculate with borrowings; look at how everything soared on the capital injections and the *psychological* boost that was given by the Fed.

5. Concentrated portfolios
Yes. There's no point including second-rate investments that give the illusion of diversification when, in fact, the extra holdings simply add complexity and often a lower rate of return.
That said, it is unwise to allocate more than about 10-15% to one company or more than 20-30% to one sector.

6. Smaller companies
No. Risk is too high in most cases. It is difficult to get good information on such companies and it is very easy to be "blindsided" by an unexpected problem that only the really well-connected investors knew about.
I vastly prefer FTSE100 companies, but occasionally have small holdings in FTSE250 and only very occasionally smallcap/AIM.

7. Independence
Yes. I don't need to be loved and I don't care what other investors think of my portfolio, nor how much they may mock what I'm holding - which is why my holdings are listed in my profile.
In fact, the more sceptical the comments about what I'm holding (and the more I am chastised in chatrooms), the more I feel confident that I have a true contrarian portfolio set to generate superior returns.

AleisterCrowley 05 May 2011 , 2:26pm

"Chastised in the Chatroom" sounds like a Mills & Boon romance...

Siwan1963 05 May 2011 , 3:22pm

How to make a million? That's easy. Start with 100 million and then buy a football club!

guykguard 05 May 2011 , 4:40pm

It's invariably intriguing to read how much cleverer others are than I am, which I have to admit may not be that rare.
For those who, like me, sometimes wonder how a few people know what so many others seem not to know, or be able to do, may I recommend rescuing your sanity by also reading "Where are the Customers' Yachts?" by the redoubtable Fred Schwed. For each one of the 12 wise investors mentioned by Mr Godbold there are thousands who never made it much further than the Poor House.

ukdt 07 May 2011 , 11:48am

As F958B states in his comments above there are many of us doing well looking after our own financial affairs without necessarily making it to the heights of the featured dozen.

It was interesting to me that most trawled through the smaller companies and I must disagree with F958B on his point re smaller companies as an investment as I think private investors have a big advantage there over FTSE100 investing especially for growth.

In the book Eric who is very well known as a poster on TMF shows how his research and networking made him the grand master of this sector of the stockmarket. We can all learn techniques and new skills.

KestonMark 07 May 2011 , 1:24pm

They were all men ! I am sure there are successful female investors to be found. I have still not seen a good explanation why they were not found or included ?

eccyman 07 May 2011 , 5:43pm

#AleisterCrowley

Interesting as these studies are, I'm always worried about 'survivor bias'

My thoughts too, would be interesting to follow..

(1) Folk who'd followed same guidelines, but not been successful

(2) Lessons learnt from those who've lost a fortune.

Having said that, the guidelines do make success. Only one I'd question is concentrating portfolios?

geeWCee 08 May 2011 , 8:20pm

Was a very good read, but from memory didnt alot of them achieve their initial success in the tech boom? Still inspiring stories, but a little cheesed that I missed out on those years.

spinquark 09 May 2011 , 12:06am

"...wonder how a few people know what so many others seem not to know"

This is also a question of psychology. In reality some people think they know the answers simply because they have highly judgmental personalities. A small number of these people are randomly lucky enough to find their decisions pay off - for most they don't. However we only hear from those that were lucky.

Where is the book called "Twelve bankrupts reveal the secrets of their failure".

Notice that success always has to be seen to have a "secret". This is like tossing a coin 10 times and then writing about the "secret" of how I got 10 heads when it is just random good luck.

Things you can say are that "you have to be in it to win it".

Honeywood 09 May 2011 , 10:21am

There are some good comments above. But to those who imply that Free Capital neglects the role of luck, I urge you to read the book. The introduction (available free on the web) discusses the issue at some length. And the words "luck" or "lucky" appear more than 35 times throughout the book.

Carmensfella 09 May 2011 , 11:03am

I think it is possible to argue that a trader who depends on the turns and momentum of the market before closing his trade is certainly dependent on a large element of luck.

Investors generally must also have luck on their side as we are always told to expect the unexpected ! However an investor who does immense amounts of research and converts it into hard figures that the poor by contrast analyst research for small companies cannot compete with is likely to overide the luck element when the market catches up with the diligent research IMO.

In other words as Gary Player the famous golfer stated 'the harder I practise the luckier I get !'

uncut1 09 May 2011 , 6:32pm

Always sceptical about these sort of books which usually enrich only the author.

I have been investing for 30 years and although a wealthy man by most peoples standards I have found that he market will always trip you up when you least expect it.

Investing is a get rich slowly pastime and publications which indicate otherwise are very misleading in my opinion.

eccyman 09 May 2011 , 9:08pm

Without being pedantic, you can't get wealthy by investing alone. Successful investing is a wealth multiplier. No matter how good someone is at investing, unless you've surplus to cash to invest it's of no use.

Wealth accumulation is a combination of saving and investing

KevinGodbold 09 May 2011 , 11:32pm

Always sceptical about these sort of books which usually enrich only the author.

But not in this case as the author's royalties are going to charity.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.