The Easy Way To Equity Income: Revisited

Published in Investing on 18 March 2011

Investment trusts pay dividends for lazy investors.

In an article just over a year ago, I set out a simple, minimum-effort income strategy, designed as an alternative to an annuity for those prepared to accept the risks of equity investment.

One year on, it seems an appropriate time to revisit the strategy and see how the sample portfolio I used to demonstrate the idea has performed.

Investment trusts

The strategy uses investment trusts, which are stock market-listed companies that invest in other companies and assets.

One of the characteristics of investment trusts is that they are not obliged to distribute all their annual income to shareholders. Many run a 'revenue reserve', which they add to in times of abundance and draw on in times of famine. This prudent policy is designed to enable them to pay out a growing dividend to their shareholders through thick and thin.

The strategy

Using investment trusts for income was not a new idea, but most of the discussion I'd seen on the topic revolved around trying to identify a few superior specimens.

I suggested a slightly different approach. Pick a broad basket of trusts with the following unexceptional characteristics: reasonable size (market capitalisation), yield, dividend growth and revenue reserve; and the stated objective of increasing dividends in the future.

This broad-basket approach simply taps the income-generating capacity of the generality of fairly large and boring investment trusts, rather than attempting to cherrypick a few 'top performers'.

THE FOOL'S NEW INVESTING SERVICE!

Introducing Motley Fool Dividend Edge

Join us as we uncover high yield shares that can give you an investing "edge". Using a £20,000 real-money portfolio, one of the Fool's most highly-regarded investment gurus shows you what dividend shares to buy, when to buy them and when to sell them.
CLICK HERE for full details

An added benefit is that if a freak 'Black Swan' event completely wiped out one trust it wouldn't be the end of the world for the income stream.

The portfolio

I selected a portfolio of 10 investment trusts, by way of demonstrating what I considered to be suitable candidates, acknowledging there were others that might have fitted the bill equally well.

The core of the portfolio came from the UK Growth & Income sector. I also threw in a UK Growth trust that was on a reasonable yield and a couple of trusts with a global mandate, just for variety.

In the table below, the final column shows the dividend growth in the year to 9 March 2011 (the exact anniversary of my original article). The other columns show annual dividend growth in the preceding three years on a like basis.

Company2007/82008/92009/102010/11
Bankers (LSE: BNKR)8.08.04.05.2
City of London (LSE: CTY)10.811.72.05.5
F&C Capital & Income (LSE: FCI)13.46.62.52.4
Invesco Income Growth (LSE: IVI)11.15.62.44.0
JPMorgan Claverhouse (LSE: JCH)13.37.23.03.6
Merchants Trust (LSE: MRCH)8.13.81.41.8
Murray Income (LSE: MUT)11.011.10.90.9
Schroder Income Growth (LSE: SCF)17.16.12.32.2
Scottish American (LSE: SCAM)11.56.13.42.2
Temple Bar (LSE: TMPL)5.36.04.02.0
AVERAGE11.07.22.63.0
RPI inflation4.23.30.14.8*

* Estimated RPI inflation, based on 11 months to January 2011

As the table shows, the investment trusts continued to grow their dividends through the 2008/09 recession, a time when many income investors in individual blue chips were reporting falls in excess of 30% in the income of their portfolios.

In the three years to 9 March 2010, the investment trusts averaged annual dividend growth comfortably ahead of RPI inflation. In the latest year, average growth continued positive in absolute terms but slightly undershot inflation.

I strongly suspect this period of sub-inflation growth will be short term and will be reversed when the pick-up in individual company dividends feeds through to investment trust shareholders.

Year to year

At 9 March 2010 the portfolio's trailing 12-month dividend yield was 4.5% (FTSE All-Share 3.2%). An investment of, say, £75,000 at that date would have delivered, after costs and with 3% growth, an income of about £3,500 in the year to 9 March 2011.

After an average 10.5% capital growth over that period, the trailing 12-month yield of the portfolio stood at a still-quite-reasonable 4.2% (FTSE All-share 2.9%).

The share prices and trailing yields of the individual constituents at 9 March 2010 and one year on are shown in the table below.

CompanyShare price
(p) at
9/3/10
Share price
(p) at
9/3/11
Yield
(%) at
9/3/10
Yield
(%) at
9/3/11
Bankers3804163.02.9
City of London2612864.74.5
F&C Capital & Income2132233.93.8
Invesco Income Growth1761914.94.7
JPMorgan Claverhouse4244714.03.7
Merchants Trust3534006.35.7
Murray Income5556285.04.6
Schroder Income Growth1821954.94.7
Scottish American2002354.53.9
Temple Bar8018814.13.8
AVERAGE  4.54.2

After the market turmoil of the last week, share prices are now somewhat lower, making the current yields slightly more attractive, though still at a level below last year's average.

Research

As I mentioned earlier, there are other candidates beyond these ten, which could also merit consideration. The AIC website is a good place to begin research.

In addition, there has been a considerable amount of discussion about baskets of investment trusts on our Investing for Income community board over the past six months. In particular, regular contributor Luniversal has produced a remarkable body of historical data and analysis for many trusts; and, latterly, a handy bibliography of his posts on the topic.

In light of the interest in this strategy, I'll continue to monitor my original 10-trust demo portfolio and report on its progress again next year. The main thing I'll be looking for is whether the trusts have returned to delivering income growth ahead of inflation.

> G A Chester holds shares in Bankers, City of London and JP Morgan Claverhouse.

 

*** FREE REPORT - Get Defensive With Dividends ***

For long-term investors, the best defence is a good offence. Never mind what the overall market is doing -- position your portfolio correctly and you could protect your investments for the long term.

Click here to claim your FREE Motley Fool special report.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Luniversal 18 Mar 2011 , 10:01am

Thanks for the plug, M0by. Your findings are very much like mine; the only individual trust I'm not so keen on for income-and-growth is Sottish American (SCAM). But it is worth getting more foreign-minded trusts into the mix, e.g. Murray International (MYI).

The main thing I'll be looking for is whether the trusts have returned to delivering income growth ahead of inflation.

I expect that in 2011 this type of IT will raise its dividend by about 5% in real terms-- having (as you say) come through the baaaaaddest times for corporate payouts since the 1930s without letting investors down at all badly.

Hannibalis 18 Mar 2011 , 10:08am

Income investors will be interested in the mix of dividend and capital growth with lots of diversification - but I wonder how much you are paying in fees for all of this? - presumably a mix of ETFs would give a better result (because of the lower admin costs & charges).

If you're concentrating on income you may need to think about replacing the lower yielders and buying something with a higher yield (i.e. converting the capital growth into more income)?

BarrenFluffit 18 Mar 2011 , 10:22am

Most of the smoothing in dividends comes from the use of reserves; effectively the income from earlier periods retained by the management. Ultimately the price of this smoothing is slightly lower dividends longer term. Whereas an ETF costs less, pays out everything but dividends fluctuate more. The other difference is that IT's can borrow; the cost of that finance directly affects yields.

That said the price of smoothing may be quite small, and a the well spotted opportunity.

Luniversal 18 Mar 2011 , 6:21pm

My research shows that trusts' revenue reserves are stronger than at the end of the previous bear market and dividend drought, c. 2003. There is no reason to fear that declarations will be braked by the need to replenish reserves.

The TERs for larger generalist ITs range round 0.8% pa, and some are jettisoning those noxious performance fees. There has been a crackdown on expenses applied to the revenue account since the early 2000s (one reason why reserves could be built up) with better housekeeping and some reweighting on to the capital side. A bunch of income ITs yields about the same as a bunch of directly held higher-yielding blue chips-- but with less income volatility.

No ETF properly replicates an income-oriented IT or High Yield Portfolio. People used to hope that FTSE UK Dividend Plus (IUKD) would, but the last couple of years knocked that delusion on the head. A mechanical skimming and rebalancing of the top yielders led it to fill up with yield traps such as financials:

http://boards.fool.co.uk/nice-one-iukd-is-five-12097116.aspx

Active management, which does not necessarily connote churning, is how you establish a long run of divi increases. Trackers are not equipped for a growth & income mandate.

jaizan 18 Mar 2011 , 8:25pm

I find the discount to NAV on some Investment Trusts can be considered as partially offsetting the management charges.

Also, some ETFs lack transparency.
Certain etfs which are "designed to track XYZ index" via investments in swaps a other instruments. In some cases, I can find no reference to dividend income or payments, despite the fact the underlying index may have a dividend yield of over 3%.
Now if an etf does merely track an index and there's no visibility of the dividend income, then how can I invest in it?

At least Investment Trusts have to publish accounts, so you can work out where the money goes.


Tara1492 21 Mar 2011 , 6:15pm

Is it worth looking at the growth/shrinkage of the NAV as well as the dividend and share price, and the discount to NAV, when evaluating Investment Trusts? I invested for my mother in high income investment trusts because she wanted income and they were great for this purpose but I seem to remember that the capital did not grow - or not much - which is worth bearing in mind if you are taking the income rather than re-investing it.

masudbutt 22 Mar 2011 , 1:47pm

My bigest mistake investing in ETF for divdends, FTSE UK Dividend Plus (IUKD) and Euro stoxx select dividend 30. These never recovered form having financial shares. As I am reinvesting Dividends I am forgetting these for long time. I am going for ITs & UTs.

eccyman 22 Mar 2011 , 6:12pm

Is it just me who's reluctant to invest in an outfit with a SEDOL code of SCAM?

ProfessorMarcus 24 Mar 2011 , 10:06am

Well spotted eccyman, I'd also avoid Murray Income (MUT) as it may turn out to be a dog.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.