4 Blue Chip Companies, 4 Big Dividends

Published in Investing on 8 September 2010

With growth hard to come by, more than ever it's all about the dividend yield.

Is someone out there reading my ramblings? Only yesterday, after seven straight days in a row of stock market gains, I highlighted how sovereign debt concerns, particularly in Greece, have not gone away.

The jitters are back, for the moment anyway. Apparently they came from a Wall Street Journal story that claims some banks involved in the summer's European stress tests had understated their exposure to sovereign debt.

Banking shares fell, with Barclays (LSE: BARC) leading the way, down 9p to 314p. Is it really fifteen months since I sold my entire holding at about the share price they trade at today? Does that make me an investing genius, plain lucky, or someone who is great at looking through the rear view mirror? Add your comments below.

The canary in the coal mine?

As for the sticky issue of sovereign debt, according to Bloomberg, the gaps between 10-year German bond yields and those of Irish and Portuguese debt climbed to all-time highs, while the German-Greek yield spread increased to its widest level since May.

Also on Bloomberg, Quincy Krosby of Prudential Financial said "Widening spreads are like a canary in a coal mine. It's a signal that debt concerns are mounting."

Look out below? The VIX, otherwise known as the fear index, jumped close to 12% in New York. Are you nervous?

It's not supposed to be like this. "Rally fades with summer's demise" goes the headline on FT.com. Whatever happened to the "Sell In May And Go Away" mantra? Summer is supposed to the time when markets pause for breath, before unleashing a last quarter assault on new highs as investment bankers chase their million pound bonuses. FTSE 6,000 anyone? Maybe next year.

Pessimism rules, again

What a difference a day makes. Just yesterday, markets were happily ignoring Greece, and the double-dip recession, focusing instead on the still-dire but better than expected US job numbers. Today, obviously after reading the Motley Fool, it has decided to be all pessimistic again. Next week may be different. Or not.

If nothing else, it just goes to prove how fickle markets can be. If you base your investing decisions on the daily mood changes of the market, you'll always buy at the top and sell at the bottom.

In that respect, if you are cashed up and looking to buy shares, you should cheer for a lower stock market, in the short term at least. The only slight stick in the ointment is that sort of bad news that brings much lower share prices is, err, a Sovereign Debt Crisis Mark II or a slide back into recession.

Are they on the way? One might lead to another, so we could be hit with a double-whammy. If I were a betting man, I'd suggest the odds of a major double-dip recession are about 10%. I'm certainly not making any investment decisions on the basis of a 10% chance.

It's coming... Don't miss out on your chance to join our exclusive share-tipping service. Guarantee your place  on the next Champion Shares PRO enrolment! Click to join our priority waiting list.

The long and winding road

Much more gloomy talk from me and you'll all think I've turned all bearish. I haven't. I remain a realistic optimist. And despite all these stock market machinations, I remain of the view the economic road to recovery will be long and winding, with apologies to the Beatles fans out there.

With that in mind, yesterday I also said today I'll look at the prospects for some blue chip shares. Regular readers will be sick and tired of me banging on about the merits of such companies, but, hear me out…

CompanyShare
price
F'cast
P/E
F'cast
dividend
yield
F'cast
earnings
growth
GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK)1,249p10.25.3%4.5%
BAE Systems (LSE: BA)323p7.45.7%4.4%
Vodafone (LSE: VOD)160p10.95.6%(3.3%)
Standard Life (LSE: SL)215p12.66.2%(7.1%)

A quick glance through the middle two columns and everything looks rosy. These are solid FTSE 100 companies trading at modest valuations and attractive dividend yields.

But then look at the last column: growth. As you would expect in this sluggish economic environment, these large companies are struggling to grow. As such, despite their relatively lowly P/E ratios, their share prices are unlikely to suddenly take off.

Enjoy the divis

This might be stating the obvious, but an investment in such blue chips is mostly about the dividends. Sure, the shares might get a re-rating to a P/E of 12 or 14, but I wouldn't hold your breath. For that to happen, I'd suggest the global economy would have to have put the worst behind it, with unemployment falling and interest rates rising. As I write, there's little sign of that happening any time soon.

But all is far from lost. Big FTSE 100 companies such as those listed above should firstly be able to maintain and grow their dividends, and secondly their share prices should have limited downside from their modest valuations. Investing nirvana? Not quite. Sensible investing in low growth, low interest rate environment? I'd like to think so.

If you are looking for investing nirvana, you need to find growth. The problem is, growth comes at a price. Have you seen the P/E ratios on ARM Holdings (LSE: ARM) or Autonomy (LSE: AU)? You can certainly put the odds in your favour, but there are no free lunches in investing.

More on the economy and the markets:

> For two weeks in September we will be opening the doors of our Champion Shares PRO newsletter service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Join the priority waiting list now.

> Bruce Jackson has an interest in Vodafone and GlaxoSmithKline.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

F958B 08 Sep 2010 , 9:23am

If Reckitt Benckiser can trade with a 16x P/E - despite forecasts for a complete stalling of its earnings growth over the next few years - I don't see why some of the shares mentioned in the article can't be significantly re-rated by the market.

timthegambler 08 Sep 2010 , 11:42am

Could you explain the factors behind your forecast of a 10% chance of a "major double-dip recession".

Cheers,
Tim

Luniversal 08 Sep 2010 , 1:05pm

As I keep saying, deleveraging will take a long time, and hurt more people more than almost anyone except those who remember the early 1930s can now imagine.

It has barely begun-- all talk and apprehension, hardly any pain. It WON'T be averted because "governments need votes, so they won't let nasty things happen." The moment arrives when the system is so exhausted by palliatives, has developed so high a resistance to them, that it rebels and just refuses to let the temporary magic of fiat money and inflation work any more; it vomits up the placebos.

Signs are that we have reached that moment. At least, in real terms equities have been trending more or less steadily downhill for most of the past 11 years-- as if to signal increasing, now terminal, fed-upness with Keynesian claptrap. Savers and investors are thoroughly disillusioned about 'free enterprise' and 'market forces' where every base is loaded. They are DEEPLY cynical about the Wise who preach riskiness to them for a commission and a crafty turn on every deal, and they are desperately scared about tomorrow.

Why should the bulls' mystic 'weight of money-- it's got nowhere else to go?' resonate either? It had nowhere to go after Dec. 31, 1999, when prospects appeared far brighter for Western economies and prosperity more assured... but not a lot of it drove the DJIA and the Footsie. And now that weight of money is being earmarked for old age, healthcare, unemployment, kids' first time property buys and to make up for lousy State benefits-- not for 'champion shares'.

This isn't a call to dump every stock, only for concentrating on the income and real-world value elements in selection. Ignore the siren song of 'Total Return' shysters still tipping and quick-bucking. Slow cooking, not fast-food profits.

If we get through the disinflationary/deflationary times without becoming helots of Asia, it will be because we have given the speculators, the nanosecond traders and snake oil salesmen the sack. We will work harder for the same rewards, save more and depend on others ('the State') less.

The part investors can play in this renewal of self-discipline is to back businesses doing real good to the world and making real, cash profits which they distribute fairly. Everything else is bovine ordure, the detritus of the last century.

UncleEbenezer 08 Sep 2010 , 2:01pm

No free lunches in investing?

You've been to the wrong AGMs! :)

57andrew 08 Sep 2010 , 2:46pm

I tend to the Luniversal camp having had first hand discussions with many people smarter than I am. I have listened to people who really drill down into the detail and whilst I may not agree with everything I think the general thrust that we are in for Dickensian Hard Times is hard to fault. The books have to balance. At the same time I have taken my pension out of the UK and put it into a QROPS so I now have to invest it and at the moment it is 100% cash! I am looking at about 20 stocks for my equities allocation and favouring dividend yields of ~5% up with a rock solid balance sheet. I have re-read Benjamin Graham and want to sleep at night. A real return of 5% is fine by me. Energy and food are my picks and probably some govvies on the fixed income side or high quality corporate bonds. 10 year Aussies yield about 5% too but of course carry FX risk. But for the time being I am staying long cash and feel no overwhelming urge that I have to invest in SOMETHING, doesn't matter what. All I want for Christmas is a short sharp correction. Thank you, Santa.

donovan5 08 Sep 2010 , 4:37pm

If you sold your entire holding at the same price they are today it doesn't make you a genius or lucky assuming you didn't invest better elsewhere,you made no extra profit at all whats genius about that?

scurlogue 08 Sep 2010 , 5:47pm

I buy a house. Every year for twenty five years I pay a premium to insure the house. This premium increases from time to time which is supposed to reflect some form of increase in sevice. After 25 years my house burns down. My insurer provides me with a tent as the full and final settlement of my claim because it turns out that a large proportion of my premium was going on the over-inflated salaries of people with "eastern" aspirations. Am I happy?
I pay National Insurance to the state for thirty four years and then get a lecture on personal responsibility from L'Universal and 57Andrew. Which words will MF allow me to use to describe them?

MK22 08 Sep 2010 , 6:51pm

The thing that worries me most about all of this is that it has nothing to do with reality. The value of shares goes up and down, company ratings go up and down and yet it has absolutely nothing to do with the health of the company, the value of the company its assets or its business. All of these factors are just fancy ways for people who couldn't hold down a real job to pretend to value companies and destroy or build them up according to their current pet whim. Remember Standard and Poors told us Lehman Bros had a AAA rating. BP's market capitation has been reduced by something like 10x the likely maximum payout over the American Oil Rig that exploded. And yet these people are destroying our pensions and people';s lives. Frankly as far as I am concerned the recession will start ending when Standard and Poors et all go bust and market traders become what they are, selling apples on a market stall. 'Cos frankly that's all the lot of them are worth.

Max878 08 Sep 2010 , 7:57pm

I'm not sick and tired of your banging on about blue-chip dividends because think you're absolutely right.

F958B 08 Sep 2010 , 8:23pm

MK22

As the Fool's favourite investor (Buffet) once said:

"....in the short term, markets are a voting machine....in the long term, markets are a weiging machine...."

In other words, price movements over periods of a few years are more to do with fashion and hype than the peerformance of the company, but over the long term, the share price will tend to follow the operating performance of the company.

The trick is to buy when shares offer good value. A great company is not always a great investment, since great companies often trade at premium prices.

A decade ago, I admired AZN, GSK and VOD. I really wanted to own some, because everyone else loved them.
They were the darlings of the market, trading on P/E's of 40x earnings or more.
Much as I admired the companies, I was not prepared to pay 40x earnings.
So I waited.....patiently.....for a long time......and seized the opportunity to add them to my portfolio after the 2009 bottom.
I paid P/E's between 7-10x for AZN/GSK/VOD *and* got the shares for considerably less than the price ten years ago, despite all three having much higher earnings and dividends.
Ten years ago, they were great companies at crazy high prices, where the odds of anyone making good returns in the long term were small.
Nowadays, they are still good companies, but are at cheap prices, offering good odds of attractive long-term returns.

jaizan 08 Sep 2010 , 9:50pm

scurlogue, National Insurance is nothing other than tax with a different name on it.

You pay tax until you are 65, to support people who never intend to work. Then when you reach 65, it's now necessary to work until 67..... whilst the spongers who never worked still get payouts from your taxes.

No, this country needs to start letting people keep more of their incomes.

ianaharris100 08 Sep 2010 , 11:06pm

As I'm semi-retired, I'm interested in dividend income- and many of the small-cap tips I've followed have shown large losses, although a few have shown gains - but most produce no income at all, whereas Shell, BP (normally)various utilities, insurers, do-and are likely to rise at least in line with inflation, as will their dividends. Then put your money into a SIPP, and never, never buy an annuity - inflation will destroy your income - just keep the capital and spend the dividends.
Then commenting on Jaizan - don't pay more in unemployment benefit than the average wage, out of which they have to pay their own outgoings, as working people do, and don't pay child benefit for more than 3 children, to stop people having 8 children at our expense.

Larry1795 08 Sep 2010 , 11:06pm

Should not comparison Lists of shares include a column for Market Capitalisation and more importantly Debt!!!?

F958B 08 Sep 2010 , 11:23pm

Larry1795

Perhaps debt and market cap would be useful - but so would pension deficit.

The significance of debt varies with the company.

Utilities can carry high debt loads because their earnings are generally very stable, which makes it profitable for them to increase borrowings without much fear of a recession causing them difficulties in making debt repayments.

Highly cyclical companies with high debt loads are the ones that are at greatest risk of failure because when revenues dry up in a recession, they can't pay back what they owe.

jamesunsen 09 Sep 2010 , 8:35am

3 months ago you would have had BP in there, so that's a 20% loss in dividend

MK22 09 Sep 2010 , 9:22am

@F958B I'd love to believe you, but quoting Buffett who's only interest is making money out of buying and selling shares, not out of producing anything useful, merely goes to prove my point.

shefbucaco 09 Sep 2010 , 9:34am
geeWCee 09 Sep 2010 , 10:59am

I better buy some Connaught then! Whoops!

57andrew 09 Sep 2010 , 2:08pm

Perhaps there should be a column for "Investor's Commonsense". I'd probably score an F.

peep1253 09 Sep 2010 , 5:09pm

Think I'll give BAE a miss for while,

"In total, BAE has said 642 Insyte jobs were at stake, the bulk of which have already been shed. This year, the company said it had eliminated 3,300 jobs worldwide as part of its “streamlining process.”

The cuts come as defence companies in the UK brace themselves for what they believe will be a cut of up to 15 per cent in the UK’s defence budget, which is expected to see the scaling back of big procurement programmes such as aircraft carriers, also manufactured by BAE. "

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.