A Bevy Of Industrials

Published in Investing on 31 August 2010

The FTSE's industrial sectors are home to a lot of very good companies, with some solid investments to be found amongst them.

When we look around the sectors of the FTSE, some of the smaller sectors don't really warrant an examination on their own, and so we will sometimes combine them to provide a fuller and more general look at a business sector.

That's what we're doing today, and the table below contains the constituents of four actual FTSE sectors related to industry -- General Industrials, Industrial Engineering, Industrial Metals & Mining, and Industrial Transportation.

As usual, the list includes all companies from the FTSE main list, and all AIM companies with market capitalization values of over £50m.

CompanyIndexMarket cap
£m
Turnover
£m
Year End
Smiths Group (LSE: SMIN)FTSE-1004,3962,665Jul 2009
Tomkins (LSE: TOMK)FTSE-1002,8412,713Jan 2010
Rexam (LSE: REX)FTSE-1002,6754,866Dec 2009
Weir Group (LSE: WEIR)FTSE-1002,4431,390Jan 2010
IMI (LSE: IMI)FTSE-2502,1621,792Dec 2009
Ferrexpo (LSE: FXPO)FTSE-2501,774421Dec 2009
Rotork (LSE: ROR)FTSE-2501,358354Dec 2009
Melrose (LSE: MRO)FTSE-2501,2121,299Dec 2009
Spirax-Sarco (LSE: SPX)FTSE-2501,212519Dec 2009
Cookson Group (LSE: CKSN)FTSE-2501,1601,961Dec 2009
Charter International (LSE: CHTR)FTSE-2509931,659Dec 2009
Talvivaara (LSE: TALV)FTSE-2509496.2Dec 2009
BBA Aviation (LSE: BBA)FTSE-2507521,081Dec 2009
Forth Ports (LSE: FPT)FTSE-250599174Dec 2009
DS Smith (LSE: SMDS)FTSE-2505732,071Apr 2010
Bodycote (LSE: BOY)FTSE-250420435Dec 2009
Fenner (LSE: FENR)FTSE-250395499Aug 2009
Stobart Group (LSE: STOB)FTSE-250371448Feb 2010
Kalahari Minerals (LSE: KAH)AIM-100350n/aDec 2009
London Mining (LSE: LOND)All-Share2825.77Dec 2009
Wincanton (LSE: WIN)All-Share2792,183Mar 2010
RPC Group (LSE: RPC)All-Share268720Mar 2010
Fisher (James) & Sons (LSE: FSJ)All-Share233250Dec 2009
Hill & Smith (LSE: HILS)All-Share203390Dec 2009
UK Mail Group (LSE: UKM)All-Share199385Mar 2010
Vitec Group (LSE: VTC)All-Share193315Dec 2009
Severfield-Rowen (LSE: SFR)All-Share181349Dec 2009
Clarkson (LSE: CKN)All-Share177177Dec 2009
Pursuit Dynamics (LSE: PDX)AIM-1001660.05Sep 2009
Int. Ferrous Metals (LSE: IFL)All-Share16168.6Jun 2009
Hamworthy (LSE: HMY)AIM-100157214Mar 2010
Douglasbay (LSE: DBAY)AIM-100127662Dec 2009
Goldenport (LSE: GPRT)All-Share11161Dec 2009
Braemar Shipping Services (LSE: BMS)All-Share100119Feb 2010
Goodwin (LSE: GDWN)All-Share8794Apr 2010
British Polythene (LSE: BPI)All-Share60425Dec 2009

Let's look at a few examples, from various parts of the scale, starting with the biggest three.

The big three

Smiths Group, which turns over more than £2.4bn a year, operates in a wide range of fields, including medical equipment, machinery designed for harsh environments (even Mars), sensor detection of explosives and drugs, and a good few other things. And despite the global recession, earnings in 2009 only dipped by about 15%, with a decent rise forecast for this year and next.

Second placed Tomkins, whose business interests aren't as diverse as Smiths', with two divisions: Industrial & Automotive and Building Products, unsurprisingly had a tougher time of the recession, with earnings falling by a half for the year ending January 2010. It is set to recover in 2011 and then some, with further earnings growth forecast for 2012, although it is currently subject to a takeover bid. 

And third in the table Rexam makes consumer packaging, which is hardly a glamorous business, but it's clearly a vital one -- it might not make any investor a 10-bagger any time soon, but it's not a company that's going to run short of business either.

What do these three have in common? They all have net cash, are all in long-term robust businesses (even if Tomkins is perhaps a little more susceptible to economic cycles), all carry net cash on their books, and they're all on reasonable, if not spectacularly cheap, valuations. 

Smiths and Tomkins are on P/E ratios of about 14 for their next full year end, falling to about 12 for the year after, and are offering dividend yields of around 2.5 to 3. And Rexam, with its less volatile business, is unsurprisingly lower valued, with a P/E of 10.5 for this year and 9.5 for next, and a dividend yield of about 4%. 

They're all solid companies that would make good portfolio candidates for those who don't want too much excitement.

Lower down the ranks

At the other end of the scale we have companies like Goodwin, which has attracted Foolish attention in the past, most recently by Owain Bennellack on the occasion of the company's recent preliminary results. Perhaps surprisingly for such a small company, revenue only dipped a little during the recession, and profits held up. And the company has a reputation for being well managed by its founding family.

Then there's a whole raft of middle-sized companies, like Severfield-Rowen, which impressed David Holding with its interim results last week, and Stobart Group, whose famously liveried vehicles have engaged many a bored traveling child in games of 'Eddie spotting' up and down Britain's motorways. Again, both are debt free and are on modest P/E ratios.

And... well, as you can see, there's a whole host of possibly unexciting but good quality companies amongst these sectors, and while we often caution that some sectors are not ideal for widows and orphans, these are some that probably are.

If you have any favourites, or know of any overlooked gems amongst these companies, please do let us know, below.

Previous Sector Analyses

> If you're in the market for buying shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to open an account for free today.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

bouleversee 31 Aug 2010 , 11:28pm

Have I missed something? I thought Tomkins was the subject of a recommended and largely agreed takeover, albeit at a somewhat undervalued price. Is this not going through then?

TMFTigger 01 Sep 2010 , 11:41am

It is - subject to a bid that is. I thought we had mentioned that in the article, but we appear not to. I've now added a quick note about it.

bouleversee 01 Sep 2010 , 1:31pm

It would seem from the scathing articles in The Times today that, thanks to some of the institutions, this takeover which is effectively a management buyout is going ahead and yet again shareholders are being shortchanged. A similar thing happened with Trafficmaster where the top brass are going to be involved in the takeover company and Chapelthorpe, which had at last started to buck up, is being taken over for peanuts as one of its non-exec. directors sold out his entire holding to another major shareholder, without informing the board in advance, triggering a mandatory offer which one has no option but to accept as it is being taken private and won't be paying dividends. Mug's game being an ordinary shareholder really. £12k (excluding inflation for a decade or so) down my particular drain in the past few weeks.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.