How I've Grown My Pension

Published in Investing on 13 August 2010

One year on, a Fool reports on his progress.

A year ago, I related how I'd abandoned my poorly-performing Equitable Life pension, and put the whole lot into a SIPP in early 2009. In a few short months, my fund then grew 21% -- a stark contrast to the decade long gloom that I endured as it staggered on under Equitable.

Simply put, a starting investment of £65,400 in my new SIPP had grown to £79,230 -- a healthy increase of some £13,830, or 21%. I was, I thought, well on course to achieving my modest goal of doubling the size of my pension pot in the fifteen years or so before retirement -- a doubling that would require an annual growth rate of just under 5%.

The article attracted lots of comments, and is still being read today. A number of readers asked for regular updates. Today, I want to provide an annual update, and also respond to some of the points raised in readers' comments.

How I got there

Briefly, though, let's review what I did, and why.

By late November 2008, a window of opportunity had opened that was too good to miss. Having just 4% or so exposure to the stock market, Equitable's with-profits fund had been protected from the fall in the FTSE that had seen the index slump from 6,716 in July 2007 to the level of around 4,000 it had reached when I made the decision.

But equally, Equitable's fund wouldn't benefit from the eventual upturn, when it came. I could leave the money in the Equitable -- or put it somewhere where it would grow in line with the FTSE's own recovery: an index tracker within a low‑cost SIPP, in other words.

As I described, I initially invested £30,000 in a low‑cost HSBC FTSE All‑Share index tracker. As recovery gathered, I invested a further £30,000: £20,000 went into the same HSBC FTSE All-Share tracker, while £10,000 was placed into Legal & General's Pacific Index tracker, which invests in a basket of Asian shares.

I subsequently invested the final £5,000 in HSBC's FTSE 250 tracker, and during early June sold some FTSE All-Share units -- locking in a gain of 10% -- and invested £2,500 in each of two investment funds I'd written about here and here on The Fool: JP Morgan's Natural Resources fund, and the CF Junior Oils Trust, which invests solely in smaller oil and gas exploration and production companies.

The remaining £5,000 went into buying more FTSE 250 units, the logic here being one that I'd also written about on The Fool: historically, in a bull market, the FTSE 250 comfortably outperforms the All‑Share index.

I made no other trades, and on 14 August 2009 my SIPP stood at £79,230 -- which, as I've said, was a gain of 21%.

Reader feedback

By and large, the comments on what I'd done were very favourable, and -- indeed -- a number of you had similar experiences to recount. Judging from the comments, though, it's worth clarifying a few quick points.

First, a poster asked why I was focusing on capital values, and not income. What had happened to the income from my investments? So, Luniversal, if you're reading this, the answer is that all the funds were 'accumulation' units, where income is rolled-up into the unit value.

Another poster, Judaas, extolled the virtues of ISAs, pointing out that -- in his or her opinion -- what I'd achieved would have been even better in an ISA. Maybe so (although I'm dubious, given the funds I'd invested in), but don't forget that you can't transfer pensions into an ISA. You can only transfer them into other pension products. So an ISA was never a runner, in other words.

Poster max22222 kindly corrected my understanding of Jim Slater's famous quote: thank you! Likewise, woodberry100 kindly shared some doubtless hard-won wisdom on the practicalities of managing a SIPP.

So how have I done?

During the year, I've made just one trade. As reported here, I sold £2,500 worth of FTSE All-Share units, and bought into Anthony Bolton's Fidelity China Special Situations (LSE: FCSS).

It's up 3% since, and has certainly outperformed the subsequent fall in the FTSE, but of course, what matters is what happens over a timescale of years, not months.

The Motley Fool presents an Exclusive 'Behind the Scenes' look at the revolutionary Champion Shares PRO share-tipping service! CLAIM YOUR ACCESS To get a sneak peak of the information and tips normally only available to paying subscribers, CLICK HERE TO JOIN THE PRIORITY WAITING LIST

Speaking of which, my pension pot -- being largely linked to the fortunes of the FTSE -- has naturally suffered from that fall in recent months. It's healthily up again over the year, of course, and has grown as of this morning's valuation to £92,034 -- a respectable increase from the level of £79,230 of a year ago. A rise of 16%, to be exact.

That said, we live in troubled times. Earlier this week, the value stood at well over £95,000. And back at the market's peak in April, it was almost touching £100,000.

Finally, as last year, the star performer continues to be my Pacific Index tracker, which has doubled the size of the original investment.

Where next?

This is a real money portfolio, don't forget, and not a fictional construct. More to the point, it's my money. And my pension. So I'm not aiming for adventure.

But while the bulk of the portfolio is tied to the FTSE All-Share and FTSE 250 indices, nevertheless, as you'll have seen, I have been making a few side bets.

And in the coming months, it's my firm intention to make a few more of those.

  • A week ago, for instance, I wrote about investing in India. I've now decided what to do.

  • I've also recently written about the merits of the FTSE 250 vs. the FTSE All-Share. So expect to see a little more exposure to the FTSE 250.

  • At present, America doesn't feature at all. If -- as I hope -- the fortunes of the FTSE All-Share and the S&P 500 diverge, and especially so if the pound continues to appreciate, I'll be buying into the S&P 500.

  • I'm also tempted to modestly increase my exposure to Fidelity China Special Situations.

  • Among the BRIC nations, I'm aware I've no exposure to Brazil -- or indeed, Latin America at all.

  • I'm also tempted to increase my natural resources exposure.

So, in short, let's see how I get on in the coming year.

And finally.....

This pension isn't my only pension pot. In addition to an old employer's defined benefit scheme, I mentioned last year that I had a second pension fund, a stakeholder pension worth some £25,000 that was attracting charges of £14 or so every month.

No longer. It's now on another fund platform, invested solely in Vanguard trackers. And, of course, there's a decent slug locked away in ISAs -- trackers, funds, and individual shares.

In short, I'm doing everything I can, within reason, to ensure a comfortable retirement.

Nevertheless, if you have any suggestions to make, they're very welcome. So comments in the box below, please. And I'll report back next year.

Popular articles:

> As noted, Malcolm holds the various funds and trackers mentioned above.

> With The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service, you can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. You can also shelter them in an ISA or SIPP. Open an account for free today.

> For two weeks in September we will be opening the doors of our Champion Shares PRO newsletter service. In order to keep our exclusivity, only a select number of our readership will be able to join us. This is your chance to guarantee your place! Click here to join the priority waiting list.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

TMFFlaneur 13 Aug 2010 , 4:15pm

Excellent performance, bravo! :)

Regarding FCSS, I've been keeping an eye on it but apart from a week where I must have been asleep, it's always trading at a reasonable premium to assets.

It's a bit of a leap for me to back Bolton to not only beat the Chinese index, but beat the premium, too... Are you not worried, or are you waiting for it to come down?

rogerthebodger 13 Aug 2010 , 4:31pm

Thank you for sharing this Malcolm - it's just what the younger, and i suspect many senior, investors need - Reality Investing.

Chinga1 13 Aug 2010 , 4:37pm

Malcolm,

Congratulations on a solid performance.

I would be a little uncomfortable with the UK weighting of your portfolio. Although I appreciate many FTSE companies generate their profits abroad, I imagine the proportion of profits from FTSE All share and FTSE 250 companies is still fairly high.

So I like your idea to diversify into India, more in China and Latin America.

I like your move into commodities via your natural resources and oils funds, but again you may want to consider increasing your exposure to gold as a hedge against inflation. I'm certainly considering it for my portfolio which is even less weighted towards commodities than yours.

I look forward to your next update

lotontech 13 Aug 2010 , 5:00pm

Well done Malcolm, that's a really good performance in a non-leveraged SIPP. Let's hope you hold on to those profits.

theRealGrinch 13 Aug 2010 , 5:26pm

well done! any thoughts to a little bit of exposure to say indonesia or turkey or even individual stocks?

johnnygibber 14 Aug 2010 , 8:50am

Started my SIPP in Feb of this year, and its been a rollercoater so far.
Up 4% so far but that was -2% last month.

One BR(IC) ETF thats been fairly good to me is ishares IEMB. Invests in sovereign bond funds (Russia is biggest stake) Not too volatile and get a monthly divi payment too.

TomJefs 14 Aug 2010 , 8:46pm

I find the blend of pretty narrow trackers and funds an odd combination for a 15 year horizon. The world is shifting East and I don't see how a UK biased portfolio is safe.

I also view the costly JPM Natural Resources which has done me well over 4 years (has gold covered albeit Henderson was late last year) a tactical hold. I also have ETFS AIGCI which may have done poorly but may be a better long term prospect.

REITS ETF, Bonds ETFs, Global ETF, broad emerging markets ETFs make a better long term allocation to me. Funds long term seem questionable. The one exception I tend to make is Woodford for equity income.

MDW1954 14 Aug 2010 , 8:54pm

Hello TomJefs,

As stated, 24.5% of the portfolio is either in Asia Pacific, or China.

Are you saying I should increase that proportion?

Foolish regards,

Malcolm (author)

TomJefs 14 Aug 2010 , 9:09pm

Malcolm,
20% directly in emerging markets is enough to me. But it is not spread across enough emerging markets. You mentioned side bets but a global ETF which accounts for global growth even as the world shifts East makes a "safer" core holding. Your UK growth bias (where are wven the value caps?) looks an unbalanced portfolio, if you, like me, are aspiring for a long term, growth orientated, reduced risk allocation.

ht51 16 Aug 2010 , 12:50pm

I though the minimum invstement in Vantage index trackers was £100,000

ht51 16 Aug 2010 , 1:14pm

I meant Vanguard

oldmutual 16 Aug 2010 , 1:36pm

Malcolm
I am ex Equitable too and currently I have a fund valued at £161,000 invested as follows:
Aviva Defensive £49000
Skandia Prof Cautious £84,000
Skandia Prof Sterling Deposit £28,000
OK all very conservative and careful

But having lost so much ground due to ELAS I need to up the anti now. How do I go about setting up a SIPP that I can manage?

MDW1954 16 Aug 2010 , 2:16pm

Hello ht51,

There is no minimum if bought through the Alliance Trust fund supermarket. That is where my other SIPP is invested.

Malcolm (author)

MDW1954 16 Aug 2010 , 2:19pm

How do I go about setting up a SIPP that I can manage?

Hello oldmutual,

There are various SIPP providers -- ask on the Fool's SIPP discussion board for recommendations.

The SIPP I'm describing here in this article is with Hargreaves Lansdown.

Malcolm (author)

CatcheeMonkee 16 Aug 2010 , 4:23pm

Sippdeal are very good. More than doubled my SIPP over the last 18 months with bank preference shares (LLPC for instance), subordinated debt and PIBS. Still a way to go with some of these depending on how inflation and interest rates pan out.

smerfdoobrie 16 Aug 2010 , 5:48pm

The usual plugs for Hargreaves Lansdowne-perhaps they are the best SIPP provider-perhaps not.
However bearing in mind the recent wobbles in financial security of certain banks etc what safeguard have you got if your fund manager goes bust?
i.e. is there a 50k safety net?
Or some other saviour of your pension fund if things go awry?

JohnyH1 16 Aug 2010 , 7:08pm

Is there any reason that you have not invested in etf's as opposed to funds. They are lower cost and cover most parts of the world and various commodities, so you would not be as dependent on the FTSE

MDW1954 16 Aug 2010 , 8:12pm

Hello smerfdoobrie,

The SIPP is a "wrapper"; my security is the underlying investments.

This article doesn't actually mention which fund platform the SIPP is with, although I believe last year's did.

Malcolm (author)

MDW1954 16 Aug 2010 , 8:16pm

Hello JohnyH1,

As it happens, Hargreaves Lansdown levy a charge of 0.5% on shares and ETFs, but not on (most) trackers and funds.

That charge makes holding ETFs more expensive than holding equivalent funds. To hold ETFs more economically, I'd need to use a shares-oriented alternative, such as The Motley Fool SIPP, or SIPPdeal.

Malcolm (author)

jaizan 16 Aug 2010 , 11:06pm

SIPPdeal are good.

I just wish I could find a way of getting my company pension contribution paid to that account, rather than being wasted in the hands of Standard Life.

bazersom 16 Aug 2010 , 11:55pm

How did you transfer from Equitable? They tell me that I can have a Cash free lump sum and a Pension or Transfer the Fund value less a 15% penalty.

MDW1954 17 Aug 2010 , 9:01am

Hello bazersom,

The penalty was 15% at one point, doubtless (which put me off transferring earlier), but has been 5% for some time. I paid 5%, which I considered worthwhile.

Here's the relevant text from the Policyholders' FAQ page:

Q. Can you tell me how much the financial adjustment is on surrender?

A. At present the financial adjustment applied to non-contractual termination of with-profits policies is 5%. This may increase or decrease in the future.

Cheers,

Malcolm (author)

dallse 17 Aug 2010 , 9:35am

All very encouraging.... I accidently happened upon the fool back in Jan 2010 whilst “Googling” alternative ways to invest and earn a decent pot to retire on. Since then I have been watching, reading and digesting. I bravely made my first investment on my birthday, May 28th. I bought 100 shares in TAM at 944.27p... today there up 40.6%. So far I’ve invested a total just above £5K from tips here and there.

BP. 651 @ 306.6p
LOOK. 1000 @ 52.09p
TAM. 100 @ 944.27p
TSC. 163 @ 379.2p
VEC. 2467 @ 40.788p

Since my first investment back in May 2010, and as of today my investments are up 28.93%... thanks, in part to the Fool. As mentioned by one poster above, the trick is holding on to the gains...WHEN DO I SELL. For this reason, and to continue moving forward I’ll be subscribing to the next issue of Champion Shares Pro. Like Malcolm, I have 15 years too my retirement and £47k to invest. I only have a measly pension which I have paid £20 pm since the age of 18 and that’s it. Time is marching on. Bring on the CSP.

TomJefs 17 Aug 2010 , 9:54am

Malcolm,
My SIPP is also with Hargreaves. As I stated above I use ETFs mainly with some funds. That 0.5% fee you referred to is levied across the entire portfolio and is capped at around 200 pounds +VAT. I don't believe that it is expensive or reason not to invest in ETFs, which give more flexibility than index funds which can be crucial for a balanced portfolio.

Hargreaves push funds because their business model relies on trail commission which is fine. But is little evidence to suggest most funds outperform trackers/ETFs over the short or long term. It is like trying to find a needle in a haystack. I challenge Hargreaves to do an analysis of it's Wealth 150 versus their indexes over 1,5,10,20 years including fees. Their ethos that they "believe" funds are better than trackers may be a challenge too far for them. Their service and platform (despite poor ETF analysis) is excellent.

MDW1954 17 Aug 2010 , 10:19am

Hello TomJefs,

Here on the The Fool, I think many people would agree with the sentiments expressed in your second paragraph. Certainly I hugely favour trackers over funds, and have just 5% of this pension portfolio in funds -- including Fidelity's China Special Situations fund.

Viewing my pension portfolios as a whole, I'm likely to add ETFs at some point, but not on HL's platform.

Malcolm

TomJefs 17 Aug 2010 , 10:41am

I will be interested to hear where you invest your ETFs. You sound like you have many different providers requiring quite a bit of oversight.

I consolidated with Hargreaves for my protected and non protected SIPP and ISAs for convenience and solid service. I don't think an annual fee of approximate 260 pounds is a lot for that.

I do wish Hargreaves would offer Vanguard trackers and more ETFs, like Wisdom for international dividends and not pretend "there has been little interest" fo these products which I find dubious at best.

I do think with Market pressure Hargreaves with have to provide a better deal for ETF owners (it is competitive but not as good as SIPPDeal).

gordonbanks42 18 Aug 2010 , 9:02pm

HL has an annual cap on its Vantage SIPP charges, so once you're paying them £200 + VAT pa, you might as well load up as much extra ETF stuff as you can afford.

Alternatively, last time I looked Alliance Trust wasn't making any ad valorem charge for holding equities (incl ETFs). So if you don't even want to pay HL their £200, you don't have to. But they'll still get their kick-backs from the fund operators, of course.

Given a standing start, I'd use HL as a fund supermarket provider and Alliance as the place to hold ETFs, gilts and any direct equities if it were just down to running costs.

Splitting like that can make it hard/expensive to reallocate funds from one type of vehicle to another if the need arises. On the other hand, splitting it also doubles up your FSCS protection. Although you're right in saying you can't lose money from a SIPP provider going bust, that's only true provided they've played by the rules. There's still a fraud risk, and it does happen.

For some stupid reason FSCS protection rules still favour using insurance company pension providers rather than SIPPs. Could that be because insurance companies have the ability to influence Govt policy more strongly? Certainly doesn't have anything to do with protecting investors...

pensionpot1 21 Aug 2010 , 4:29pm

I have a Stakeholder pension which I began investing in as soon as they were launched. However my contributions to this keeps going up and up while the annual pension forcast at what I shall receive when I am 60yrs old has gone from £100pm to £96.00pm. I am unsure at what to do.But at the same time I know that I must take charge. To make my prediciment worse I shall have to work till I am 65yr old to qualify for state pension. Should I alter the plan on my existing stakeholder to 65?
Any advice would be extremely useful, Thank you in advance.

TomJefs 24 Aug 2010 , 11:08am

@pensionpot, I also had a (Scottish Widows) stakeholder pension. It had an awful website platform, poor transparency, and limited choice. I transferred the whole lot to a Hargreaves SIPP.
Your retirement forecast may be low because your contributions are still too low (are you clear what you need in retirement?). I would recommend a SIPP which should give greater choice and most chance of reaching your goals.

rogerthebodger 24 Aug 2010 , 2:34pm

This is all very informative. But shouldn't we however, and before piling every last penny into tax incentivised pension funds, first consider the outcomes?
For example, what cost structures apply to the matured fund and what restrictions are placed on accessibility to, what is after all, our own money.
Remember the old adage - quality is remembered long after price is forgotten (or similiar).
Well, retirement is no different, because the same applies.
The quality (in retirement) is having unfettered access to both capital and income and the (highish) price of that is self investment sans
tax rebates. This, as 20% taxpayers, is the path we have followed, not even an Isa, let alone a pension fund of any description. But it's worth it because we now have tax and cost efficiency where we really need it, in retirement.
To qualify the Isa conundrum -Isas are often high cost investments and although CGTax free, because in our case the income on our equity income funds is not reinvested, the chance of realising taxable gains on the odd rebalancing disposal is reduced to an amount close to that of our combined CGT allowance. Eg a 20K disposal to rebalance a 100K portfolio might realise a gain of at most 20K which is covered by our CG allowance. So gain wise, Isa and non Isa, no difference, except of course we would have been paying more in annual manco costs on the Isa compared to that of our UTs.
(thank goodness for Microsoft Excel)




Accumul8er 07 Sep 2010 , 7:53pm

rogerthebodger, you are right that, under present tax rules, there is no advantage for a 20% taxpayer in putting funds into an ISA. However, given that the cost of a good ISA is fairly minimal, it may be a worthwhile insurance policy in case higher rate thresholds are brought down in future or the CGT threshold is reduced (as proposed by the LibDems who in 5 years time may hold a stronger balance of power).
The debate between ISAs and SIPPs is complex but I am inclined to agree with you that for 20% taxpayers SIPPs are not that attractive. You sacrifice flexibility and there is a danger of receiving 20% tax relief on the way in but 25% or 30% (who knows?) on the way out. I feel pretty certain that tax rates will rise in the future - one way or another.

pensionpot1 11 Sep 2010 , 3:16pm

Thank you for the comments. I still feel unsure of what to do, but I have kept my ISAs up to date, and keep transfering them around for better rates.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.