Is Now The Time To Invest In India?

Published in Investing on 6 August 2010

Is India overvalued? A Fool agonizes.

Go on, name Britain's single largest manufacturing company. BAE Systems (LSE: BA), perhaps? Or GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK)? Or even Unilever (LSE: ULVR)?

No, it's none of those. According to the BBC's economics editor Stephanie Flanders, it's actually Indian conglomerate Tata. "As a result of buying Tetley, Corus, Jaguar Land Rover and the rest, Tata is now the single largest manufacturer in the UK," she writes.

Quite how she's measuring size, she doesn't say. Employment, presumably. But in any case, the precise definition of size is not especially relevant to the central point that I want to make today: that India as an investment opportunity is becoming too big to ignore.

Steady progress

And yes, I know, I've said it before. I've looked in detail at India here on The Fool on two other occasions, most recently -- back in February -- concluding that valuations were a little high.

But six months on, has anything changed?

Back then, I spoke with two fund managers: London-based Avinash Vazirani, manager of Jupiter's well-regarded India fund; and Sanjiv Duggal, the Singapore‑based manager of HSBC's flagship India fund -- the largest offshore India fund in the world, with over $6 billion over assets under management.

So as a starting point, I checked back in with them to see what they were saying now. Here are the highlights:

  • India's GDP continues to grow strongly. Q1 GDP came in at an annual rate of 8.6%, and figures from the Reserve Bank of India this week point to that level of growth or thereabouts being achieved throughout the rest of the year.

  • Inflation, which is high at around 10%, appears to be being addressed by interest rate rises -- no fewer than four of them in the past year. Inflation is expected to peak in the current quarter, though, with the monsoon that is currently drenching Pakistan also expected to help bring about lower foodstuff prices.

  • Manufacturing comprises around 20-25% of the Indian economy, around half of which is exported. The health of these export markets is provoking some cause for concern, but only moderately.

  • A new rule requiring listed companies to have at least 25% of their shares publicly available is likely to create something of an overhang on the Indian market, but is generally seen as a good thing.

  • The Indian government is benefiting from higher‑than‑expected tax revenues, and seeing tangible results from its long‑voiced attempts to reduce the national budget deficit.

  • Additional revenue has come from the auction of the 3G mobile phone spectrum, partial deregulation of fuel prices, the consequent removal of fuel subsidies, and the divestment of government holdings in a number of companies.

All of which sounds like reasonably good news, I would have thought.

A worrying P/E

When I last wrote about India, Bombay's Sensex index was trading at 16,500. Yesterday, it closed at 18,116. That's equivalent to a P/E of 21.5, versus the FTSE's closing P/E of 14.5 yesterday.

Predictably, fund prices tell the same story -- even when, as in the case of HSBC's Indian fund, a recent rise in sterling compared to the fund's US dollar base currency has helped to soften the blow. Compared to 4 February, for instance, when I last looked at India, it's up 12%. Jupiter's India fund, even though invested in very different shares, is up by an identical amount.

Put another way, the Sensex itself is not far from its 2007 peak of just short of 21,000. And to put that in its starkest perspective, at that level it's a very long way indeed from its 2003 Gulf War low of 2,950 -- when our own FTSE 100 bottomed out at 3,287 on 12 March 2003.

Off the scale

In short, to many Western investors, that just doesn't 'feel' right. It's difficult to look at a chart of the Sensex over the past ten years or so and think that India is anything other than overvalued.

The trouble is, India itself has become enormously transformed over those ten years. And continues to be transformed, with an economy growing at 8% or so. So it's easy to lose touch with the modern reality on the ground.

Here's what Jupiter's Avinash Vazirani says, for example, having just returned from a trip there:

"There are huge, palpable changes that have taken place since my previous visit, which was only last February. New metro systems, railway lines, ports, power plants, roads and airports are appearing at an unprecedented rate.

The new international Delhi airport opened a few days ago, ahead of schedule, having taken 33 months to build from start to finish. It is the third largest in the world behind Beijing and Dubai, accommodating up to 126 flights at any one time.

A comprehensive example of this development is visible in the achievements of Adani Enterprise in the state of Gujarat. Within six years, the company has metamorphosed from an energy trading company to the owner and operator of three massive ports, oil storage tanks, power plants, and all the roads and railways that connect each project in the 45 km seafront site."

Do I, or don't I?

The cash is there, and it would be easy to press the 'buy' button.

I'm not looking at a short-term trade, but a longer-term stake that would grow over ten years or so.

Yet India feels fully valued, and the significant foreign capital inflows into its markets continue to worry me -- despite the new offerings and privatisations that help to soak up some that cash.

But the truth is that I've spent eighteen months finding reasons not to invest in India at the moment, and I'm wondering just how long I should continue to dither.

What do you think? Comments in the box below, please!

More from Malcolm Wheatley:

Malcolm owns shares in BAE Systems and GlaxoSmithKline.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Chinga1 06 Aug 2010 , 5:44pm

I recently took the decision to go 50% weighting in emerging markets. Although I'm only about 6% overall in China and India. Yes,I think that China and India are overvalued at the moment, but that doesn't mean to say that they won't get significantly more over valued in the future. My guess is that the Chinese and Indian markets are more likely to rise than fall in the short term. In the longer term, who knows, but I don't feel we're into bubble territory just yet, perhaps just at the start of one but I think this particular bubble has a lot further to go as PIs start to cotton on to the poorer returns in the developed markets compared to EMs.

If you are concerned over the value of Indian equities, why not have a look at Russia and Latin America?

bbei 07 Aug 2010 , 10:44am

Invested moderately in JPM Indian five years ago and have watched the shares climb, and climb...... and climb albeit with significant blips on the way. I view the JPM Management as v conservative, often underperforming the index since they never go out on a limb on speculative companies or sectors, but largely stick to finance, oil and gas, construction, IT and engineering via well established and well managed companies. I see no reason to sell and look forward to further growth.

Tortoise1000 07 Aug 2010 , 11:40am

How many times are you going to write this article, Malcolm ?

http://www.fool.co.uk/news/investing/investing-strategy/2010/02/04/two-takes-on-india.aspx?

;-)

'I'm wondering just how long I should continue to dither.'

Well, the normal length of time is until just before the crash, then jump on the bandwagon at the last minute :o)

I was thinking about investing in India the other day. I agree the story is good and I like it best of the BRIC countries. Then I opened one of the weekend papers and saw there was an article about it. (Might have been Sunday Times Money section, cant check becasue it is in the bin now). Bad sign!

Dont buy if you are not sure, Malcolm. Leave it and think about something else. You are looking long term, arent you, so you can afford to wait for the next crash. There is bound to be one. Or if you cant wait to get started, make monthly subscriptions.

BTW, why dont you choose the JP Morgan India Investment Trust? Just wondering, because it seems to get recommended a lot.

T

Soicowboy 07 Aug 2010 , 4:21pm

There are a surprising number of individual Indian companies listed on AIM. Most I have looked at are hugely indebted, but a couple I like are Digital Quality Entertainment (DQE) and EROS, a film production company.

RajivB 09 Aug 2010 , 4:14pm

@Soicowboy there's also a v.big player in the FTSE 100... Vedanta Resources

Another way you may want to consider investing in India is the Lyxor India Fund (LNFT.L). Quoting the Lyxor ETF India funda data sheet...

"Lyxor ETF India (S&P CNX NIFTY) aims to achieve investment results that closely correspond to the S&P CNX
NIFTY Index ("the Index") (Bloomberg Ticker: NIFTY) insofar as possible minimizing the tracking error between the
ETF's performance and that of the Index."

Glasshalfull 09 Aug 2010 , 7:17pm

As sowicowboy mentions, both EROS and DQE are excellent plays IMHO.

EROS is expected to announce details of the book-building stage of the IPO of it's Indian subsidiary. This should happen shortly and the process should raise $80m for a maximum of 25% of its subsidiary. The subsidiary is expected to be valued at approximately $360m based on peer valuations. I would expect an uplift in the AIM listed EROS share price if the recent IPO of DQE is anything to go by. EROS also plans to move to a Full Listing once the IPO is complete.

Re. DQE - please find a link to my recent post in PPP which will provide a summary of an apparent valuation anomaly that I believe exists.

Regards
GHF




UncleEbenezer 09 Aug 2010 , 10:41pm

Am I the only one vaguely pound-cost-averaging into an Indian-subcontinent fund? It's showing healthy gains, and long term I expect currency rates to work in its favour, even as India itself goes up and down.

MDW1954 11 Aug 2010 , 10:10am

Thanks for the comments, everyone. Much appreciated.

And T, I did actually link to the earlier article!

Malcolm

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.