What Next For Child Trust Funds?

Published in Investing on 3 August 2010

Should CTFs continue, even if no government money is forthcoming?

As widely expected, one of the first announcements made by the new coalition Government back in May was that the Child Trust Fund (CTF) scheme was to be phased out during 2010 and then scrapped from 1 January 2011. With children born from 1 August the first to receive the reduced £50 Government contribution, what are the benefits of the scheme, what's going to happen to them and what are the alternatives?

The current scheme

Under current rules, each child eligible for child benefit in the UK receives a Government voucher that must be invested in a CTF account. CTF accounts can be cash, stakeholder investment (equity exposure with strict charges and investment rules) or shares investment.

Anyone else, although most likely to be friends and family, can add funds to a child's account, up to a maximum of £1,200 per account per tax year. The fund grows tax free and becomes the child's cash at age 18 to do with what they will. That's right whatever an 18 year old decides to spend his or her cash on.

Under the original rules, each child was given £250 by the Government at birth and a further £250 at age 7, and these amounts were doubled for the lowest income families. Under the new rules, children born between 1 August 2010 and 31 December 2010 will receive £50 at birth only, and from 1 January 2011, no further Government payments will be paid.

As the scheme started on 1 September 2002, this means that parents of children born between 1 September 2002 and 31 July 2003 are the only ones lucky enough to have received their age 7 payments. Lucky them.

What happens in January 2011?

As described, no more Government payments will be made and no new CTFs can be established once all the issued vouchers have been used. However, CTFs set up for children born before 1 January 2011 will continue to run, as before, and additional contributions of up to £1,200 per annum will continue to be accepted into these accounts.

This seems a little unfair to those children born in 2011 onwards. Not only are they missing out on free Government money, but they will also be denied access to a tax-free savings account for children.

As a result the Save Child Savings Alliance has been formed to lobby the Government into retaining the structure of the CTF accounts, meaning that children could continue to have CTFs with up to £1,200 investment per annum, albeit without a Government handout.

The campaign is supported by a number of people and organisations, including two of the largest providers of CTFs (unsurprisingly). They quote statistics showing 74% of parents open a CTF account compared with 29% who open an ISA and 40% with a pension. Call me cynical but perhaps having free money to open an account with contributes to those higher figures.

However, it does raise the point as to whether the existing facilities available mean that an ongoing CTF account is not necessary.

The alternatives

The first alternative is a stakeholder pension. Anyone can have a stakeholder pension, so it is perfectly possible to invest in a stakeholder pension for your child instead of a CTF. 

The advantages of a stakeholder over a CTF are that you can invest up to £3,600 per annum and that you get basic rate tax relief on the contribution, meaning that £3,600 investment only costs £2,880. The downside is that your child can only access the cash at retirement age- while it is anyone's guess what that age might be for children born now, it is certainly going to be older than 18. 

Still, if you are a fan of the long game, even a modest investment now will become a tidy sum over 70 years.

The other quoted alternative is an ISA. However, under the current rules, only those over 16 can take out an ISA in their own name. Of course it is possible for you to take out a personal ISA and then donate the cash to your children at some future point, potentially a little older than 18 perhaps, but that does mean you are missing out on your own tax-free investment allowance.

Perhaps, therefore, an alternative to perpetuating the CTF could be to extend the ISA regime to allow investment for children, with protection such that there can be no withdrawals from the fund and it transfers into the child's own name at age 18? Or 21. Or 35.

Other things you could do include investing in a Friendly Society scheme, effectively an insurance bond that is tax exempt, where you can invest up to £300 per annum for each child. Alternatively, invest £25 to £3,000 per issue in NS&I's children's bonds for up to 5 years and earn up to 2.50% tax free.

What do you think? Is a CTF a viable investment vehicle? In which other ways do you invest for your children? 

More from Sam Thewlis:

> Check out our Investing for Children discussion board and download free reports on child savings plans.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

billyboy121 04 Aug 2010 , 1:06pm

The total abolition of the CTFs is in my mind a poor move and not in keeping with what I'd view (as a political neutral) as a standard Tory value of social mobility and self/ societal improvement through capitalism. I agree that it's not necessary for every child to be entitled to free money from the government (whether directly through CTFs or indirectly through child benefit) but I do think the CTFs provided a way for families who are for whatever reason less familiar with the plethora of financial services out there to be able to contribute to their child's future. Means testing the government's contributions would be sensible (and probably Labour should have made that part of the scheme in any case), fine, but wholesale abolition was not the right thing to do.

In the absence of any contribution, i'd be more inclined to invest in an ISA (if they became available). My experience of friendly societies is an extremely low rate of return that is not compensated by their tax free status. To start a pension for my child that they could only access on retirement would be ludicrous.

sharesUpAndDown 04 Aug 2010 , 1:30pm

I think it would be simplest to extend the ISA scheme to the under 16s.
The ISA could be in the childs name with 1200 per year investment limits under a minimum age threshold and no withdrawls allowed under the threshold.
This would then transition to standard ISA regime as the child crosses the age threshold.

actiondan 04 Aug 2010 , 6:17pm

Yeah, ISA extension or CTF - I'm not too bothered which, but we need something.

I definitely wouldn't save up money for my children in a pension as I suspect that they'll need the money in their late teens or twenties, not once they've hit retirement age.

Paullypips 05 Aug 2010 , 12:41pm

Why doesn't the Government keep the contributions it would have made to these children but send them a cheque for a lump sum when they become 18 years old?

gramic 06 Aug 2010 , 12:44pm

What about using a bare trust instead? I have one with Alliance Trust who charge nothing for it (so long as you have £10k invested with them in an ISA/SIPP etc).

I'm not a fan of CTF's other than getting the free contribution from the govn. because the charges are too high and there is limited investment choice.

I doubt though if the government really wants you to save for your children (hence tax charges for trusts set up for older than 18), because that reduces their dependancy on the state, and that's not very communist!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.