It's All About The Velocity Of Money

Published in Investing on 20 July 2010

Is George Osborne banking on lessons learned from William Gladstone?

In his task of righting the wreck of the good ship Britain, chancellor George Osborne has plenty of inspiration to draw on. 

Many of his predecessors faced equally challenging and even appalling situations when they got the dreaded summons to move into No. 11. And yet many performed miracles. 

Here's a few who rose to the occasion:

  • In the last decade of the 19th century, the forgotten George Goschen saved the City from the collapse of Barings and adroitly managed the decline of sterling.

  • To fund the Great War, Bonar Law somehow managed to raise a quarter of expenditure from normal revenue although Britain was basically broke. That's still considered one of the great feats of any chancellor.

  • And after the war, Austen Chamberlain was able to convert an annual deficit of £1.7bn into a surplus of £340m in two remarkable years.

  • Blighting the copybook, Winston Churchill restored the gold standard in 1924 so "the pound could look the dollar in the face". He nearly ruined the economy.

  • In 1931, Austen's brother, the much maligned Neville gave our George a star to steer by. He walked into a full-scale Depression but bit the bullet, introduced a series of austerity budgets, built up reserves and stabilised the pound, all in six years.

  • Kingsley Wood cobbled up money from everywhere to fight the 1939-45 war. American and Empire loans, a 100% excess profits tax, fire sales of British overseas assets: He did them all and more. Exhausted, he died on the very day he was to announce the introduction of PAYE, a boon to every later chancellor because of the cashflow it gave them.

  • In 1945, Labour's Hugh Dalton, who said he "swallowed my fate in one gulp", inherited the biggest national debt in the history of the world and an economy "close to bankruptcy". The job ruined his career.

  • In 1951, Conservative Rab Butler likewise inherited a gigantic balance of payments problem that also ended a promising political career.

  • In 1967, Jim Callaghan had to devalue sterling and humiliatingly go cap in hand to the IMF for US$3.9bn in credits to bail Britain out. Nearly ruined his career.

  • Things were so bad when Denis Healey took over from Callaghan that, as later wrote, he soon learned "to exude confidence, without actually lying". This impossible job was probably why he never became prime minister.

Candle-ends and cheese-parings

Heroes all, or most of them. 

Because of his ferocious attack on public spending, Osborne is probably closest to William Ewart Gladstone, the tight-fisted Scot who once thundered: "No Chancellor is worth his salt who is not ready to save …. candle-ends and cheese-parings in the cause of the country." 

While funding two wars, Gladstone made his (tiny) staff re-use the envelopes and re-sharpen the pencils down to the stump -- and this at a time when the Britain ruled the waves.

To Gladstone, all public expenditure was almost a sacred responsibility. Taxes, he said in a 21-point list of reforms for the Exchequer, should be collected for specific purposes and deployed in the people's interest only after the most careful consideration, and in as transparent a way as possible. 

"Finance is, as it were, the stomach of the country from which all the other organs take their tone," he said. I can think of a recent chancellor, a historian as it happens, who might have remembered that.

Fructify and prosper

Under the great Gladstone, the vast majority of Britons paid much less tax than did the rest of Europe, something of which he was particularly proud. 

He argued that money left in the people's pockets would "fructify" in ways that improved their prosperity. And, funnily enough, it did.

A generation later, economists such as Keynes and America's Mariner Eccles would identify why. It was not the stock of money, they proved, that made the people prosperous. It was the velocity of money. That is, money shouldn't be hoarded; it should be spent.

More from Selwyn Parker:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

supasap 20 Jul 2010 , 11:11am

yes fine but now that we live well beyond being economically active and of significant value to the labour market who is going to fund these years if we all spend spend spend

Luniversal 21 Jul 2010 , 10:38am

Reginald McKenna deserves a nod for his adroit abandonment of free trade to win the Great War. But the most heroic was the Gladstonian who became the first Labour Chancellor-- Philip Snowden.

A man of the people, he knew that inflation is the greatest of economic evils to the poor and helpless in society. He refused all temptation to print money or allow manna to be handed out via the tax system, and in 1931 he stood four-square with the National Government while his socialist colleagues ran away from the crisis.

The result was painful in the short term, but produced a Britain strong, solvent, peaceful and democratic through the 1930s... while all around succumbed to chaos, slump and dictatorship. Neville Chamberlain, rightly acclaimed in this article, built on Snowden's granite.

Like later Labour residents of Number 11-- Cripps, Jenkins, Healey-- Snowden had to prove he was a responsible steward. The worst have been Tory inflationists such as Butler, Lamont and Antony Barber, the worst Chancellor of modern times. Never trust Conservatives to protect the oountry's currency and credit. They are owned by globalist banksters.

mcturra2000 21 Jul 2010 , 10:48am

Not criticising the article, just responding with some ranting.

"Keynes ... money shouldn't be hoarded; it should be spent."

And that, sir, is how we arrive at the £200,000 per capita public borrowings that Britain faces today. It should be obvious that the idea that you can spend spend spend your way to prosperity is a flawed one. How Osborne is going to sort this mess out is beyond me.

Someone once said "savings IS investment". Not sure who it was. Maybe someone can help.

scotsboy1 22 Jul 2010 , 7:57pm

Luniversal

If the greatest Chancellor in the history of the world, the man who put an end to boom and bust, had not left us in this almighty mess caused by spending waaaay more of our money than he took in in taxes, we would not now need a Conservative Chancellor to fix the mess.

I don't know how old you are, but I remember the wonderful stewardship of Denis Healey resulting in the UK calling in the IMF. Perhaps that is we ended up in the Brown stuff, he was following responsible Stewardship.

Not usually so accusatory, but if you will throw mud, you must also receive. I trust the Conservatives to "protect the oountry's currency and credit" or even the country's, more than the charlatans who have tried to bankrupt us.

WoosterUK 26 Apr 2011 , 11:27am

[Gladstone] argued that money left in the people's pockets would "fructify" in ways that improved their prosperity. And, funnily enough, it did.

A generation later, economists such as Keynes and America's Mariner Eccles would identify why.


And they got it wrong. On this one, the Austrians got it right: you don't improve your prosperity by spending on consumables, you improve your prosperity by investing in profitable ventures. We saw massive levels of investment in infrastructure, plant and equipment during that period, and prosperity rose. Keynesianism completely misses what was going on!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.