RBS Enters The ETF Market

Published in Investing on 9 July 2010

Will investors be tempted by these interesting-looking ETFs?

While ETFs have proved popular with investors, the British retail ETF market has been dominated by three large players: iShares, Lyxor, and Deutsche Bank's db x-tracker products. Latterly, HSBC (LSE: HSBA) has added itself to that list, and over the past few months has launched a range of ETFs tracking major stock market indices such as the FTSE 100, FTSE 250, and S&P 500.

Now, Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) has entered the fray, launching six new ETFs on 1 July. Unlike HSBC's index-oriented products, which focus on the world's major economies, RBS's ETFs embrace emerging markets and commodities, with three ETFs in each of the two sectors.

And, it's fair to say, the ETFs in question are fairly distinctive, with what the bank describes as 'unique access to diversified indices from both Jim Rogers and Deutsche Börse.'

Broadly based

In each case, says Ben Board, RBS's UK director of Listed Product Sales, the ETFs track baskets -- of commodities, or shares -- that are more broadly based than most competing products.

Take the Jim Rogers metals index, for instance. The Dow Jones-AIG metals index tracks just six metals: aluminium, copper, nickel, zinc, gold, and silver. The Rogers equivalent, says Mr Board, tracks these and four others besides: lead, tin, palladium and platinum.

The same story emerges with respect to commodities.

"Look at some ETFs, and the commodity index is 70% oil," he says. "We think that if people want to track oil, they should track oil: the Rogers index is much broader, and is only 30% oil."

Likewise, he adds, the Deutsche Börse DAX indices are also broadly-based. "The DAX BRIC index, for example, not only has a cap of 10% per security but also a cap of 35% per country," he notes.

Ultimately, he adds, RBS intends to have a full range of ETFs aimed at the retail investor -- including, in time, ETFs tracking major stock market indices.

The bottom line

Charges, while higher than you'd pay for a simpler index-tracking ETF, don't seem massively out of line with prevailing rates in the market -- some are slightly higher than competing products, some slightly lower. And, of course, your money is buying you a broader base of commodities, stocks, metals and markets.

ETFUnderlying indexTER
NYSE Arca Gold BUGS (LSE: GOLB)Arca Gold Bugs Index0.70%
DAXglobal Asia (LSE: ASDX)DAXglobal Asia0.70%
DAXglobal BRIC (LSE: BRDX)DAXglobal BRIC0.70%
DAXglobal Russia (LSE: RUSD)DAXglobal Russia0.70%
Jim Rogers International Commodity (LSE: RICI)RICI0.85%
RICI‑M (LSE: RICM)RICI Metals0.85%

All in all, worth a look. And it will be interesting to see if the claims regarding the more broadly-based underlying indices tempt significant numbers of investors -- especially in the case of the two Rogers-based ETFs.

More from Malcolm Wheatley:

> You can buy and sell exchange traded funds with The Motley Fool Share Dealing service.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

mcturra2000 11 Jul 2010 , 3:48pm

Let's hope that RBS doesn't make as big of a pig's ear of this thing as their lending business.

zwhale 12 Jul 2010 , 1:42pm

Thanks for keeping me up to date on ETFs. I haven't the inclination to read lots of financial press so would have easily missed these new products.

hcidata 12 Jul 2010 , 2:05pm

I held a DB FT250 ETF once. Buying was easy but when I came to sell (at market price) it took hours and many phone calls. It was visible in the LSE order book but DB were not buying my ETF. They should have been the market maker but the system failed for me. That was a few years ago. Maybe they are better now.

TommyCockles 12 Jul 2010 , 4:05pm

It occurred to me that this might be a good means of diversifification in my MF self select ISA - ie by nominal amounts from each ETF up to the value allowed bt my ISA allowance.

However, I am put off by the fact that an index can be one currency (USD say) and the ETF is in EUR say. Given a possible TER of 0.7 - this is starting to look like investment selling by obfuscation. Its not that clear cut (to me) how easy it is to ensure profits - given the amount of incurred future costs in prospect (I know trading too much isn't Foolish but.....).

Given the above - it would seem to make timing when to add "top ups" on an ETF to my ISA vehicle very difficult - or have I just missed the point entirely. I am conversant with the ideas behind MF of course. Should I just ask an MF board perhaps?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.