Time Is Running Out For ISAs

Published in Investing on 12 March 2010

Investors are failing to use their ISA allowances to the full.

Here's a quick question for you: How much will you be able to save in an ISA in the UK in the 2010-11 year? If you answered without looking it up, the chances are you got it wrong. At least, that's what the results of a survey carried out last month by a National Savings & Investments survey suggest.

The survey found that only 15% of those asked understood that the limits are being raised so that each of us can invest up to £10,200 in shares and pay no tax on any proceeds. 

24% thought the limits were to remain the same, about the same again knew there were to be changes but didn't know what they were, and around 10% thought the new limits were for over-50s only (from April 5th this year, the allowances will be the same for all).

People just aren't using them

But perhaps more worryingly than that is the finding that 16% had shied away from ISAs completely, because they didn't really understand them and found them confusing, while 10% admitted that the idea of putting some money into an ISA just didn't occur to them. And only 16% said they plan to use up their full allowance.

Very few people are happy with the amounts of tax we have to pay these days, and it's generally pretty rare for anyone to pass up an offer of free money. But by not using your ISA allowance, you're turning your nose up at free money from the chancellor!

Now, a lot of people might say that with interest rates so low these days, they can get better returns on their cash by investing in, say, fixed-term bonds, rather than in a high street bank's cash ISA account, so it really isn't worth bothering about.

And I'd partly agree, low interest rates do indeed make cash ISAs relatively unattractive. But that's not where I think our long-term investments should be anyway -- and ISAs really should be seen as long-term investments, as the benefits of compounded returns really start to add up when measured over a couple of decades or more, rather than just a couple of years.

ISAs are best for shares

No, the whole ISA thing is shouting "shares" to me, because shares really do beat cash hands-down in the long run (and even though we've just been through a bad decade for shares, they have already bounced back quite a way from the recessionary depths, and in another decade the chances are they'll be racing ahead of cash again).

Unfortunately, it appears that most British savers disagree with me. According to HMRC's figures, the amount invested in cash ISAs consistently outstrips share-based ISAs (and that's even with cash ISAs having a lower limit). 

In 2008-9, for example, while the great British public invested £9.4bn in share-based ISAs, three times as much (£28.1bn) was channelled into cash ISAs. And of the total of 14.2 million ISA accounts that were opened in the 2008-9 year, only 2.9 million were share-based. 

Our preference for cash ISAs has been the same for the last several years as well. Indeed, as of last April, we had a total of £116.5bn invested in share ISAs and £158.1bn in cash ISAs.

But there is some good news -- the amounts that have gone into share ISAs so far in 2009/10 is likely to have been quite a bit higher, with a fair chunk invested at the low prices on offer last Spring and Summer. 

Make haste...

So what's the best way to use up our ISA allowances? Well, the first thing to remember is that this year's allowance needs to be used by April 5th, and as that is Easter Monday, it would be advisable to get it sorted by April 1st (which makes it easier for Fools to remember anyway).

And what form of ISA? For me, a self-select shares ISA is the only way to go, and The Motley Fool provides a cheap and easy one. It works just like any other self-select broker's account, charging a flat fee of just £10 per trade for UK shares, and a management fee of £12.50 (plus VAT) every six months.

More from Alan Oscroft

> Time is running out if you want to use your tax-free ISA allowance for 2009/10. And remember, if you're 50 or over, your limit has now been increased to £10,200. Protect your investments from the taxman with a Motley Fool Self Select ISA.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

really100 14 Mar 2010 , 8:40am

" ...each of us can invest up to £10,200 in shares AND up to £5,100 in cash"

Really?

Diatomaceous 14 Mar 2010 , 9:23pm

"Time is running out for ISA's".

With an election looming and a possible change of government, I'm wondering if there's a Freudian double meaning to the article title?

BarrenFluffit 15 Mar 2010 , 11:37am

Fool articles often seem to reflect articles available on the net. Its the industry who cares most about ISA's because they get most of the benefit. And its the industry who release articles about ISA's.

Frankieg3 15 Mar 2010 , 12:19pm

Are you supprised when I have lost nearly £1000 over the last two years. Also I am trying to get my money out and is now so expensive and difficult.

llahtmht 15 Mar 2010 , 12:54pm

with pensions having been hit has hard as they have by the economic situation, having the spare cash to invest £10,200 a year would be a desirable luxury

timesheet 15 Mar 2010 , 3:38pm

I have 10thousand to put into an investment which investment do you recomment

really100 15 Mar 2010 , 9:20pm

10thousand what? Goats?

TIMPERLY 16 Mar 2010 , 3:33pm

Share ISA's - is the only benefit the capital gains element? not so attractive as it used to be .

Cash ISA- providers have now realised that they can offer up to 20% less than on a normal investement because of the tax benefit-have you highlighted that anywhere.

I had two cash ISA's which were paying about 4% and last m March the rate dropeed to 0.1%- no wonder people are not investing their full amounts

RobinnBanks 18 Mar 2010 , 2:43am

Shares ISAs are not as popular as PEPs were because they are decidely NOT tax-free! Labour has eroded the concessions.
Dividends are taxed at source, and cannot be reclaimed; cash interest has income tax deducted; stamp duty is payable on purchases, and admin fees are liable for VAT. How do they get away with calling them tax free? Trades' Descriptions Act not applicable?
Capital gains are tax free, and HMRC does not need to be told about ISAs - your broker does that for you! So they are still worth investing in, but if TMF and others, such as IC, lobbied the government, they could be much better. No one bothers!
The increase to £10,200 is welcome, but just brings us back to the level PEPs were at 10 years ago!
I can never understand why fund managers and financial journalists start to encourage us to invest in ISAs at the END of the year! Mine is always invested at the START of the new tax year!. If you intend to use your allowance, why wait 11 months?

Questorien 21 Mar 2010 , 8:58pm

Alan,

Your headline (or is it a catchline?) led me to believe that your article was going to tell me that there is talk of the government reneging on its "promise" that ISAs would continue indefinitely. [Some uncertainty about the future of ISAs was expressed around the time of the ISA ten year review c.2009.]

Reading on, your mention of poor uptake of ISAs tended to confirm my apprehension. Yet, reading further on, it appears that your article is about something entirely different. Wouldn't a better title have been "Time is running out for this year's ISA allowance"?

I know its a slightly longer title but it would have avoided the increasing (it seems) trend in journalism to "sex up" the headline to get attention regardless of the risk of misleading readers.

Incidentally, congratulations on your (correct) use of "ISAs" rather than the ghastly "ISA's" used by increasing numbers of writers.

[My bank's website is covered with "ISA's", "FAQ's" and one example of "Microsoft Window's"- you'd think they would know better!

If you know anyone who sprinkles apostrophes too liberally you might do them a favour by referring them to sometrhing such as:-

http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2008/10/eats-shoots-leaves-punctuation-game.html]

End of rant!

Q.

Questorien 21 Mar 2010 , 9:03pm

OOPS! I placed my closing bracket too close to the link. Here it is again:-

http://www.freetech4teachers.com/2008/10/eats-shoots-leaves-punctuation-game.html

Sorry,
Q

Questorien 21 Mar 2010 , 9:17pm

Now I've actually tried it myself I can see that it's a cr*p rescource anyway.

Try this one:-

http://www.eng-lang.co.uk/apostrophe_rules.htm

If you want more then just google "apostrophe".

Q.

kilfinan 22 Mar 2010 , 4:55pm

Is it possible ISA usage is low because nobody has any money to invest anymore, or that interest rates are so low you might as well spend the money...

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.