My Millionaire Daughter

Published in Investing on 8 February 2010

You can make your child rich with the minimum of effort.

My best investment of 2009 was a baby girl called Alice, born in January. Her weight grew by 300% in the year; her height by 60%. Beat that, Buffett!

Last week, she grinned and gurgled her way through her first birthday party. She already has a good grasp of inflationary theory, as long we're talking about shiny pink helium balloons. And, although she doesn't yet know it, she's already on her way to being a multi-millionaire.

Little Rich Girl

How did I do that? Easy. Umbilical cord scarcely cut, I summoned the holy Foolish trinity of compound interest, regular saving and stock market patience.

The trick is this: I set Alice up with a regular premium pension scheme and arranged to pay in her Child Benefit each month. From the hundreds of funds available I selected a simple global equity index tracker. 

That's it. Hardly quantum mechanics, is it? 

But, as Einstein himself is supposed to have said, "compound interest is the most powerful force in nature".  And when you're so young that 'money' is something you find on the floor and stick in your mouth, compound interest has the power to make you seriously, massively, life-changingly rich.

The secret

Not many people know that everybody in the UK can claim income tax relief on up to £2,880 of net annual pension contributions.  This even includes new-born babies with zero income. So, every £80 a month that hits her pension becomes, as if by magic, a £100 contribution after basic rate tax relief. 

Let's make some assumptions: I continue these monthly payments for as long she qualifies for Child Benefit (currently age 18); investment returns will be 9% a year; and after 18, she makes no further pension contributions of any kind.  She just watches her pot grow until, in the year 2074, she finally retires.

At 65 her retirement fund would be worth £3,079,600.

You did read that correctly: over three million quid, just for recycling her Child Benefit every month from birth to 18. It's not that I'm a brilliant investor; it's just the ultimate long-term plan. 

Horrible market crash next year? Alice doesn't even need to glance up from her shiny cardboard book about farm animals. It won't matter to her one bit. 

Inflation will take its toll of course and reduce the purchasing power of her £3m come 2074. But, even adjusting for this, it's going to be an extremely large sum of money.

Why o why?

Why have I done this? I think it's one of the best presents I can give her. For the whole of Alice's working life she will know that her retirement is already looking pretty rosy. She won't need to struggle to fund pension contributions in her twenties and thirties. She won't be left playing 'retirement catch-up' in her forties and fifties, when many people suddenly wake up to their imminent dependence on the paltry state pension.

But there's also a discipline to my plan: she won't be able to spend the pension pot until she's mature enough to appreciate it. I shudder to think what I would have done with £50,000 at age 23. A pension is untouchable; it's a secure nest egg in every sense.

Alice doesn't have wealthy parents. She probably won't inherit several millions when we die. But she does have Foolish parents. We know that giving up £80 a month today will be worth the world to her when we're long gone. It's not much of a sacrifice, either. We don't have satellite TV and we choose not to smoke. That's at least £80 a month extra in the bank.

Child Trust Funds

Of course, we want her to have a good career and the chance to make her own fortune. University will probably beckon. This is where her Child Trust Fund (CTF) will come in handy.

Since 2002 the taxpayer has given a £250 voucher to all British babies. Families on a low income get £500. Parents can use the voucher to open a CTF account for their child from hundreds of possible providers. There are stakeholder accounts, offering a limited number of low-cost funds, and non-stakeholder accounts with wider choices, but higher costs. 

A second voucher will appear at the child's seventh birthday. The CTF account can receive extra contributions, from any source, of up to £1,200 per year, and there is never any tax to pay on growth. So a 'fully funded' CTF, assuming two £250 vouchers and 9% investment growth, could be worth £55,600 by Alice's 18th birthday.  I invest her CTF in an index tracker.

The Future

My aim is to raise a young woman who can handle money responsibly. The CTF always belongs to the child; she will be free to spend it all as she chooses at 18. Will she use it sensibly to fund her three years at Cambridge? Or will she buy a classic sports car and go on a long holiday with a failed guitarist called 'Fingers'? 

We shall see… but at least I know her pension pot will be safe.

> If you're in the market for buying shares, consider opening an online broker account with The Motley Fool's Share Dealing Service. You can buy and sell shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. Click here to find out how you can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

More from R J Johnson:

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

TheFlaneur 08 Feb 2010 , 11:40am

I like your style, but I have to admit reading these sorts of articles makes me think some great disruption is around the corner. Very rarely have societies been able to plan for 70 years of prosperity.

BarrenFluffit 08 Feb 2010 , 12:13pm

Maybe but retirement is a certainty.

LastChip 08 Feb 2010 , 12:32pm

My thoughts also TheFlaneur.

To make assumptions that the average rate of return will be 9% is bold in itself, but to assume nothing will change over 65-70 years, could almost be seen as suicidal.

BarrenFluffit says; "Maybe but retirement is a certainty"

I truly hope it is for Alice, but nothing is certain.

The only thing that is reasonably certain, is politicians will constantly fiddle with the rules over that time-scale and all the time that happens, long term planning is impossible.

BarrenFluffit 08 Feb 2010 , 4:08pm

Lastchip; While accurate long term planning is impossible, is the best response to make no plans?
Yes she might not make it to retirement but she's likely to. Will the rules be different? Yes it seems likely.
In practise if people really thought they were going to walk under a bus next year they would behave very differently but they know its unlikely.

xdante 08 Feb 2010 , 8:43pm

Nice article - I'm doing something similar for my daughter (although not in a pension wrapper).

One point to add - I think it's worth pointing out just how bad the effects of inflation could be. 3% inflation over 65 years would reduce the purchasing power of that £3m to £440k. At current single-life index-linked annuity rates that would only generate £17k per year. And if life expectancy continues to increase, that figure is likely to be lower in the future.

So a nice start to her pension pot - but she'll probably have to do some saving of her own if she wants a comfortable retirement.

LastChip 09 Feb 2010 , 1:02am

BarrenFluffit; "is the best response to make no plans?"

I think there are probably only very few who would suggest that. But the problem with a pension is, not only do you relinquish control of the cash, but also accept a fairly rigid system.

Now if by some tragic circumstances, Alice did not reach pensionable age, all that planning may well have been a complete waste of time.

Personally, I wouldn't touch present pensions system with a huge bargepole. There are simply too many unknowns.

By keeping control of your cash, you have the means to "duck and dive" as circumstances dictate.

I think the authors plan is not at all bad. I just question the vehicle they have chosen and the assumptions made.

antonyob 09 Feb 2010 , 11:36am

Its horses for courses. The reason a pension is good is precisely because you are limited in what you can do with the money. No one said its good for everything but its the best tool for retirement planning, its cheap to run, liquid compared to property and you get tax breaks. I do one for my daughter and have done since she was born. Anyone who doesnt is certainly ducking, ducking their head in the sand.

Vincenzo30 09 Feb 2010 , 12:36pm

I chose not to use the pension wrapper or the CTF (other than the free vouchers) for my two kids as I do not like the lack of flexibility.

As my wife and I do not fully utilise our ISA allowances we have saved all Child Benefit and more into tracker funds in those wrappers. We hope to continue this indefinitely, safe in the knowledge that these funds will be available when our kids reach university age (to be used if we cannot afford it out of income or other savings), and/or the time comes when they need a little help with their first property purchases.

chrisjej 09 Feb 2010 , 12:37pm

> investment returns will be 9% a year

That's a pretty big assumption. Even taking 20th century overall average stock market post inflation returns is a pretty big assumption.

There will come a time when growth must slow, oil will run out, raw material costs will rise...

BarrenFluffit 09 Feb 2010 , 12:56pm

In a sipp if the member dies before the pension is drawn down the fund is paid to a beneficiary. Ok its no good to the member but the money is not lost.

sixtyone 09 Feb 2010 , 2:44pm

Good luck with the plan. I could not agree more that this is an excellent way of saving and in my case has saved me blowing the pot at an early age on wine, women and cars. I now have £23K a year pension and also took the 25% cash sum at 50(best advice I can ever give you-TAKE THE MONEY, my pension was with Equitable......). I'm not sure I would choose a 100% index fund though. 40% good dividend shares, 30% bonds and 30% gold for me.

bouleversee 09 Feb 2010 , 2:56pm

The prospect of having a large pension fund which can only be accessed at 50, and then only the taxed income, won't be much comfort if she can't buy a home till then. We invested money in shares and deposit accounts for our children, claiming back the tax on income (no longer possible on dividends) and taking advantage of their cgt allowances and they were able to get on to the housing ladder with reasonably large deposits at an early age. If she has to rent she is unlikely to be able to save much towards a deposit so I hope you will also be able to help her to get on the housing ladder. Deposit accounts have done better than shares in the past 10 years. Annuity rates are terrible and unlikely to get better because we are all living longer. I'm not sure pension funds are worth having these days unless perhaps your employer is paying in a substantial sum.

Finally, could we please have a link to your index trackers. My equity investments certainly haven't been growing at the rate of 9% compound so I'm obviously missing something.

Iniq 09 Feb 2010 , 4:05pm

I'd be interested to know of one or two good, low-charge global equity index trackers.

I like trackers (I have a couple of very low-cost - 0.25% PA - UK FTSE all-share trackers) but global ones seem to be few and far between, and to have relatively high charges.

Iniq 09 Feb 2010 , 4:05pm
Fortitude426 09 Feb 2010 , 4:22pm

Wishing you luck but all the endowments I bought did not deliver. On pensions Equitable Life and other collapses happened.

The fact is as our Economy only grows at 1/2%, the kind of returns you want are going to be extremely difficult to achieve.

Yes, stakeholder pension is probably a must but dont invest for tax relief. Two important things to give your daughter is good Education and Property which you can leverage (in trust ofcourse) and continue to invest in Property and education apart from imparting good financial understanding and you cant go far wrong.

Congratulations, for ensuring your daughter will be self-sufficient (hopefully). remind her about prenuptials when she grows up!

PenurousMan 09 Feb 2010 , 5:25pm

Congrats etc on the nipper but what if you have another? You may get £80 a month for one child but you won't get double for a second. Have a third child and you'll really be dipping into your income. That'll be quite a commitment for 18+ years.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.