Investors Misled, Collars Felt

Published in Investing on 12 January 2010

The FSA takes a case against former directors for misleading statements.

It was the sort of announcement that investors dread: "The Board ... has received information suggesting possible accounting irregularities affecting revenue recognition ...and has therefore commissioned an investigation".

That was from iSoft in July 2006. The developer of software for the health sector was once a high-flier of the stock market, but even before this announcement a string of profit warnings had already taken some of the wind out of its sails. A potentially lucrative contract with the NHS, however, meant there was still something to play for.

FSA investigation

A few weeks after the bombshell, the company reported itself to the FSA, which commenced a formal investigation.

I was reminded of this story last week after the FSA reported that it was taking criminal proceedings against four former directors of the company, for conspiring to make misleading statements. In the meantime, the company has been taken over by an Australian business.

Buyer beware

The problem relates to revenues being booked before the work had been done, which is one of the oldest tricks in the book. But we also have to consider the extent to which investors could have been expected to spot any sleight of hand.

I've had a look at the accounts for the years in question, and I have to admit that I wouldn't have spotted it. Net cash inflow from operating activities was well in excess of operating profit -- if it wasn't, I'd have had cause to be more suspicious of the profit figure. So this serves as a sobering reminder to investors that stock-picking is a dangerous business, and that events can upset even the most carefully constructed investment cases.

I'm not a forensic accountant, so I may be missing some of the clues, but then neither are the bulk of private investors. We rely on the authorities to come down heavily on any wrongdoing or deception.

It remains to be seen whether any guilt attaches to these directors, of course, but investors will be watching the case with interest.

More: The FSA Is Getting Tough

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

abrahamisaacs 13 Jan 2010 , 1:34pm

Another well known company where there were accounting irregularities leading to severe shareholder losses was Aero Inventory, a one time darling stock.

Hotspur100 13 Jan 2010 , 2:02pm

This sort of thing happens all the time in IT Services and software delivery world. After all what do readers think caused BT Global Services to bring down BT's numbers last year. It was the same thing as iSoft directors are having their collars felt for.
Which means, assuming FSA is on the ball, that BT GS ex-directorfs, some of whom collected massive bonuses for revenue growth, and the BT board should be receiving visits too.
Take a look also at NPfIT where delivery dates were carefully agreed between the customer in NHS and the service companies, like BT GS and the other majors. The politicians over stated what was delivered for obvious political reasons which allowed the IT delivers to cgratefully accept progress payments.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.