Scroogenomics

Published in Investing on 24 December 2009

Is your Christmas an orgy of value destruction?

When you look around at Christmas, do you see an orgy of value destruction? Professor Joel Waldfogel of Wharton Business School does, and he's written a book about it -- Scroogenomics.

His idea is this: I know my preferences better than you or anyone else. So I can spend £50 on something for myself better than you can. In fact, I'll only spend that £50 if what I'm buying is worth at least £50 to me. You, on the other hand, might spend £50 on a present for me that I'd only value at £30.

Bah! Bumbug!

And there you have it, value destruction, or the 'deadweight loss of Christmas'; we'd all be better off not buying presents and spending the money on ourselves. According to Waldfogel, about 20% of the $145bn spent globally every year on gifts -- a conservative estimate, he says -- is wasted.

And 20% of $145bn is a lot of money. Enough to eradicate malaria, for example, which kills more than a million people annually. Enough, even, to recapitalise a small bank.

But Waldfogel is not implying that all gift-giving involves waste. In the case of children, he says we do a pretty good job of getting it right. And besides, a young child's sense of the value of money is not as well developed as an adult's (although I'm know some adults whose behaviour might challenge that view).

And even if an adult tells us what he wants, if he really wanted it wouldn't he have bought it already?

The dismal science

We also need to consider the value created by the joy of giving. His answer to this, though, is that we could still have that joy by giving a gift that the recipient actually wants -- he's quite positive about gift certificates, which are not quite as cold as cash. And there are wishlist websites such as WhatToGive and DreamBank that attempt to close that gap.

Even though others have questioned his survey techniques, I think he may have a good point. But if he does, it's a point I'll choose to disregard. I'm not convinced that the dismal science can really put a value on a token of affection.

Wishing you all a happy, and not entirely rational, Christmas.

More from Padraig "Grinch" O'Hannelly:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

BarrenFluffit 24 Dec 2009 , 9:29am

The idea is based on the concept of a rational man. fortuneatly for economists we know that to be a gross oversimplification. We don't know all our own tastes and may lack the inspiration/information to formulate those wishes. It's entirely possible for a present to be worth more than its cost if the giver adds value. But realistically its a very hard task and the social function of gift giving is quite different.

RobinnBanks 26 Dec 2009 , 1:34pm

Try giving gift vouchers to the bankers instead of cash bonuses!

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.