BT Pension Deficit Balloons

Published in Investing on 12 November 2009

Pension deficit up, profit down, but cost-cutting is bearing fruit, as BT's interim results attest.

Do you ever look back on one of your previous utterances and think "Hmm, I kinda wish I hadn't said that"? Early last month, in my bullish contribution to a Duelling Fools debate on BT Group (LSE: BT-A), I opined that "all the bad news regarding its debt and pension fund are out in the open, and very likely getting better".

Oh dear. In Thursday's interim results announcement, BT told us that the value of its pension fund deficit, re-evaluated under new UK accounting rules, has now more than doubled over the last six months, from £4bn to £9.3bn. However, it wasn't actually as big a surprise as headlines might make it look -- as I pointed out after BT's first quarter results announcement back in July, the reworked figure already stood at £8bn then, and might end up even higher. But the extra £1.3bn still isn't small change.

The other apparently bad news in the headlines is that pre-tax profits for the half year almost halved, down to £547m from £991m for the first half last year. However, that does include the changes in the pension fund accounting, and the exceptional costs of the redundancies that have been made in the course of the six months.

Cost-cutting bearing fruit

So, while revenues were slightly down on last year, by just 1% to £10.4bn, once the pension fund effect and the cost of redundancies are extracted, underlying pre-tax profit actually rose 12% to £888m, suggesting that BT's drive to cut underlying costs is proving successful. And that aggressive policy is set to continue, as the company raised its cost-cutting target for the end of the year by a further £500m, buoyed by its having exceeded its aims so far -- around £900m in savings has been made in just the first half.

The intention to dispense with the services of 15,000 employees worldwide is still on course for the end of the year, and there are plans for a reduction of a further 15,000 in the next financial year.

On the back of all this impressive cost-cutting, Chief Executive Ian Livingstone was able to tell us that he now expects free cash flow of £1.6bn this year,which would be a more than adequate achievement of the company's target of more than £1bn.

Global Services improve

Other headline figures include total revenues of £5.1bn, which is down 3% (or 6% excluding foreign exchange movements and acquisitions). And one very important measure, profits from the beleaguered BT Global Services, continues to improve, with adjusted earnings before interest, tax, depreciation and amortisation (EBITDA) up 53% on the first quarter, at £95m.

A very important figure in many investors' minds, net debt, has been reduced to £9.9bn -- that might only be a relatively small fall, but it's very much heading in the right direction, and the full effects of all that cost-cutting on the debt figure probably won't really feed through for perhaps another year or so.

Prospects

BT believes its future prospects are improving, with a fall in revenues for the full year of only 3-4% now expected, which is better than its previous suggestion of a drop of 4-5%. Investors did seem to share in the optimism -- the shares were up 8% on the day, to 150p, at the time of writing.

So what do I think? Despite my initial shock at the level of the latest pension fund deficit revaluation (and the revaluating must stop some time short of the next regulatory exercise due in 2011, when I expect the numbers to have started heading downwards), I do still think I was right back in that Duelling Fools article, and I'm convinced that BT is following the best possible course of action to get itself back on track for long term stable business.

It might take a few more years yet, but Foolish investors are not hasty folk.

More from Alan Oscroft:

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Luniversal 12 Nov 2009 , 4:52pm

Don't forget the halftime dividend has been cut from 5.4p to 2.3p: something you have to read rather a long way into the RNS small print to discover.

But TMF writers rarely stop and think about their thousands of small shareholder readers who are getting zilch from their deposit accounts and who are crying out for income from elsewhere. You assume we're all traders and recovery punters. Divis are for wimps and the senile, eh?

BT has disappointed, and exaggerated its prospects, more often than I've had engaged signals. It's now the Lloyds of telecoms, and anyone starting out in blue-chip equity investment should leave it in beyond-bargepole territory.

equitybore 12 Nov 2009 , 6:50pm

I have been a long term Telefonica investor - now that is what I call a telecoms company - currently suffering from slight sales drop - 1% - but with massive prospects in South America and Eastern Europe and whopping dividend.

Smiley61 12 Nov 2009 , 7:32pm

I'm sorry, but BT ticks too many negative boxes and there are too many risks to make this a Foolish long term investment amongst a bountiful list of more deserving candidates.

I was a shareholder in Marconi, who sold well before its demise; BT is unlikely to go the same way, but it did teach me about the important information in a balance sheet.

A pension fund liabilty of this size without the cashflow to support is will hinder this company for many years to come without a capital injection (probably from a rights issue).

Tread carefully..........

Smiley61

TMFBoing 13 Nov 2009 , 3:15pm

Don't forget the halftime dividend has been cut from 5.4p to 2.3p

Apologies - I meant to mention the dividend, but in my last-minute editing it got lost.

But TMF writers rarely stop and think about their thousands of small shareholder readers who are getting zilch from their deposit accounts and who are crying out for income from elsewhere. You assume we're all traders and recovery punters. Divis are for wimps and the senile, eh?

You think so? I guess that'll be why I, and others, frequently discuss stocks based on their dividend yield, presumably?

Foolish regards,
Alan

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.