Famous Scams: Bayou Hedge Fund

Published in Investing on 14 September 2009

The Bayou Hedge Fund, masterminded by Samuel Israel III, was a scam right from the start.

How would you react if an investment fund promised you that, if you invested in it at its opening, it would increase your original investment more than 23-fold in just 10 years? Regular readers of this series would, no doubt, assign it to the “Pull the other one” category and keep it well out of bargepole reach. But I'm sure you'd also be well aware that there really is one born every minute, and you'd expect the suckers to flock to it.

And that's exactly what happened with the Bayou Hedge Fund Group, founded by Samuel Israel III, when it opened in 1996. It amassed an initial $300m from investors, with the promise of turning that into approximately $7bn within the next decade.

Many fraudulent funds start out honourably, with their managers only starting to fiddle the books when their lofty ambitions are not realised. But not so for Bayou -- it was designed as a scam right from day one, with the fund's managers misappropriating investors' funds from the beginning, and using Ponzi tactics to make payouts to early investors.

Fake accountants

Even as early as 1998, Bayou was unable to show its accountants, Grant Thornton, anything like the returns the investors had been promised, but that was no problem for its enterprising directors. So they fired them and set up their own fake accounting firm, Richmond-Fairfield Associates, and then hired it to provide Bayou with fake audited accounts, embarking on a sustained spell of unashamedly overstating gains (when there were usually very few or none at all), and understating losses.

It's quite surprising that Israel and his cronies carried it off for so long -- even as late as 2004 they were reporting assets of $450m (which was a long way away from the promised $7bn, but it was still far more than the fund actually possessed). All through this, Bayou's loss-making investments were all handled by its own broker, Bayou Securities, raking in huge commissions for the group even though investors' funds were shrinking. By July of that year, Bayou was desperately fighting off losses, stopped trading, and withdrew more than $150m from a number of bank accounts -- money that disappeared overseas.

Cessation of trading

The fraud came to a halt in late 2005, when the Commodities Futures Trading Commission filed a complaint about the fund, and Bayou filed for bankruptcy early the following year. When the directors were caught, they were in the act of trying to wire the remaining $100m from the company's accounts overseas, and that sum was frozen.

At his subsequent trial, Samuel Israel pleaded guilty, and professed to how sorry he was and how bad he felt (and isn't it a shame that they never feel that bad before they're caught?). He was sentenced to 20 years in prison for his part in defrauding his investors, and was ordered to forfeit $300m. At the time, that was one of the toughest sentences levied for an investment fraud since Worldcom's Bernard J Ebbers was sent down for 25 years, but it has since been impressively eclipsed by the 150 year sentence handed out this year to Bernard Madoff.

Bayou's chief financial officer got 20 years, and co-founder James Marquez received a term of 4 years and 3 months, having been found to have played a relatively minor part in the operation.

Suicide is painless

Did Israel take his medicine and come quietly? No, a con-artist to the end, in a final twist he tried to fake his own suicide. Shortly before he was to begin his sentence, Israel's car was found abandoned on the Bear Mountain Bridge, in New York State, with the words “Suicide is painless” written in the dust on the hood. But his girlfriend, Debra Ryan, was arrested and charged with helping him escape, and Israel turned himself in -- and got an extra 2 years for the fake suicide.

Previous Scam Articles:

Death Valley Scotty

The Cazique of Poyais

BCCI

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Jethro48 14 Sep 2009 , 5:44pm

You have your facts wrong. The Bayou Funds started with less than 5 million, probably closer to 1 million. By Jan 1, 2000 they still had less then 10 million. They didn't reach 300 million until 2003 and most of that was probably phony profits being reported to investors. Israel opened the fund himself before he brought Marquez in. The first year they put in their own money to make the numbers work, illegal yes, but the beginning of the Ponzi scheme, no. They still thoght they would be successful investors. The NASD gave them formal approval to rebate commissions back to the Funds due to their day trading philosphy. I was hoping someone would go to trial so the truth about how much they actually gave back and how much went into their own pockets would come out. I know they gave back most of the profits while Marquez was still there, the end of 2000. After that, Marino gradually took over and the blatant fraud exploded. Marino then ran with his heady power, becoming the real head of Bayou. They did continue to give back significant commissions, at least until the end of 2003. They stopped trading at the end of Q1 2004. Marino was always looking for ways to make a big profit with unusual investments, so I'd bet my last dollar he was responsible for the private investments and finally the bank scheme. Marino was responsible for turning Bayou into a Ponzi scheme, while Israel was responsible for the bad trading that continually lost money. He was also unable to control Marino. Marquez was simply a tool they used and discarded when he didn't seem to be of any more use and would not go along with continuing the fraud. Ironically it was Marquez who, six months after being turned out, brought the KFx private placement to Bayou that ended up generating a 12+ million dollar profit for the Bayou Funds. Had Marino been forced out instead of Marquez, they would have made up their losses and maybe gotten away with the deception. They certainly wouldn't have followed the path Marino ultimately led them down. Most of this information is in the court filings.

TMFBoing 14 Sep 2009 , 6:29pm

Hi Jethro48,

Thanks for the additional information. I was going on published sources, which is where I got the information about the $300m. (For short articles in this series, aimed at providing a fairly light but hopefully educational/entertaining look at various scams and frauds, in-depth investigation into things like court filings isn't really feasible).

Foolish regards,
Alan Oscroft

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.