Profiting From A V-Shaped Recovery

Published in Investing on 11 September 2009

A V-shaped global recovery could see an investment in these three companies well-placed to profit.

Judging from comments and polls on the Fool's various discussion boards, it's clear that many of us have been expecting a ‘W'-shaped or ‘U'-shaped economic recovery.

So when investment bankers Goldman Sachs go on record as saying that they don't believe that -- and that the recession and eventual recovery will be V-shaped, instead -- then it's time to sit up and pay attention.

The shape of the letters tells the story. A U-shaped recession sees a sudden slump -- which we've had -- followed by a long, drawn-out period of bumping along the bottom, and then a sudden recovery. A W-shaped recession sees economic contraction followed by recovery rather sooner than in the U-shaped scenario, but it's a recovery that proves to be transient, leading to a second contraction.

But according to Jim O'Neill, chief economist at Goldman Sachs, a V-shaped recovery is now the most likely outcome, based on a 20-country leading indicator measure that the bank maintains.

Positioning for profit

I have absolutely no idea if Mr. O'Neill is correct or not -- my own degrees in economics are far too far in the past. Judge Mr. O'Neill's remarks for yourself. But what I do know is that the picture that he paints is worryingly plausible.

And that furthermore, if he is right, then I and others are losing out on an opportunity to position our portfolios to profit from an economic recovery that comes sooner rather than later.

For if the recession is W‑shaped or U‑shaped, then staying defensive is important. But if Goldman Sachs is correct, and it's a V‑shaped recovery, then the time to go for growth is right now.

So with that thought in mind, here are three shares that are well-placed to benefit from that recovery. One point to stress: Goldman Sachs is talking about the world economy, not purely the British one -- so I've looked at shares with a decent amount of global exposure.

GKN

When I tipped GKN (LSE: GKN) back in March as a solid business that had strayed into value territory, its shares were at 65 pence -- well down from their June 2007 peak of 412 pence. As I write, they are at 119 pence, a rise that's comfortably outstripped the FTSE 100.

250 years old this year, the company employs around 40,000 people in 30 countries around the world, and has some of the world's biggest businesses as its customers. But the reason the shares have slumped 84% is that many of those customers are in the automotive and aerospace industries -- in addition to its other aerospace interests, for instance, the company manufactures wing components for Airbus aircraft, having bought Airbus' factory in Filton, near Bristol.

A V-shaped recovery should see conditions sharply improve in both industries -- and with that improvement, an uptick in GKN's order book, and share price. One caveat: alone among the three shares I'm mentioning here, GKN isn't presently paying a dividend. That said, its share price upside is likely to be the greatest of the three.

Tesco

Over the past few weeks, Tesco (LSE: TSCO) has cropped up again and again in articles here on the Fool. It's not difficult to see why. As Alan Oscroft noted yesterday, company has a long track record of growing its earnings and dividends while simultaneously expanding overseas.

Yet during much of the recession, its shares have under-performed the FTSE 100, especially during the past six months or so. As I've said a few weeks ago, I think the share price is a bargain, and on that basis I bought into the business back at the end of August.

Its exposure to the British consumer gives it a defensive quality, yet a growing proportion of its sales are to overseas customers -- a difficult trick to pull off, and one which no other comparable British retailer is even attempting. As overseas economies improve, Tesco is ideally placed to benefit.

HSBC

Like Tesco, it's easy to mistakenly pigeon-hole HSBC (LSE: HSBA) as a predominantly British business. That's a mistake: as I wrote back in July, it's actually the 21st largest business in world in terms of annual revenues, and has a presence in financial centres around the world.

Certainly, its shares have suffered during the recession -- but nowhere near as badly as shares in Barclays (LSE: BARC), Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY) and Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) have done. Trading at 932 pence on June 15th 2007 when the LSE 100 peaked at 6732, its shares today stand at 656 pence as I write these words.

Having come under pressure pre-recession from active investors and hedge funds to be more aggressive in pursuing growth and taking risks, the bank is where it is today precisely because the board ignored such calls, and played safe.

Indeed, it's the only major British bank not to have required either bailing out by the government, or (as was the case with Barclays) big stakes being taken by rich foreigners.

In other words, it's a quality business that's presently cheap -- and also well-placed to benefit from a global economic recovery.

> If you're in the market for buying and selling shares, why not open an online account with The Motley Fool's ShareDealing Service. You can buy and sell UK shares in real time for a flat rate of just £10. You can open an account for free today. There is no obligation to trade.

> Of the shares mentioned, Malcolm has stakes in Lloyds Banking Group and Tesco.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

jonathanheenan3 14 Sep 2009 , 1:18pm

In about 9 months time i think we will be seeing double, and we all now what a double v is!

Fingered 14 Sep 2009 , 2:57pm

..........yep and equally other "experts" have gone on record for calling for an "L", a "Z" and even a "Backward Square Root" shaped recovery. So the article is incomplete and biased towards a "V".

Pedros143 14 Sep 2009 , 3:11pm

Is my memory failing or were Goldman Sachs one of the companies that did not see the recession coming. Surely this is positioning for their hedge bets again, hoping the suckers will rally to the flag and make them big bucks using the contrarian method.

RobinnBanks 15 Sep 2009 , 11:44pm

Standard Chartered did not need bailing out by the government nor rich foreigners, and they are a true British company, not like the Hong Kong & Shanghai Banking Corporation. Stan's shareprice has doubled to £14.50 since March.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.