Five Large Shares To Take A Punt On

Published in Investing on 22 January 2009

As sterling continues its precipitous fall, the doom and gloom surrounding our economy intensifies. Instead of wallowing in self-pity, investors are better off searching for tomorrow’s big stock market winners.

This is one of my favourite Warren Buffett investing quotes. It comes from his 1990 letter to Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE: BRK.A) shareholders:

"The most common cause of low prices is pessimism -- some times pervasive, some times specific to a company or industry. We want to do business in such an environment, not because we like pessimism but because we like the prices it produces. It's optimism that is the enemy of the rational buyer."

There is no doubting this is a time of pervasive pessimism. In recent times, it has also become specific to the UK banking sector, as many people assume large swathes of the once-mighty industry will join Northern Rock and Bradford & Bingley and be nationalised.

The more difficult question to answer right now is whether share prices are low. Many wrongly people assume two things…

1) A company with a share price of 5p is cheaper than a company with a share price of 50p.

2) A company is cheap just because its shares have fallen 70% or 80% or more.

The UK Has Nothing

The global economy is in trouble. The British economy is in bigger trouble. As quoted recently in the Wall Street Journal, Robert Levitt, a principal of Levitt Capital Management LLP, who last year dumped all of his UK holdings, including both equities and government debt:

"The UK economy is in a worse shape than the US and most other European economies…The UK has had all the vices of the US -- high debt, property prices, an overvalued currency -- but they have been even greater"

Hedge-fund manager, the outspoken Jim Rogers, and well know bear on Western economies, said in the Financial Times the pound is a currency with no underpinning and should fall against the dollar and the euro. Summing up, he said: "It’s simple, the UK has nothing to sell."

Given the pervasive doom and gloom, and the somewhat dire economic outlook, including that the UK may have "nothing to sell", are share prices low?

Not Even Obama Knows All The Answers

I think some share prices are low. They may not rebound quickly, and there is always the chance they will go yet lower still.

Economically, these are unprecedented times. No-one, not even the man who currently walks on water, Barack Obama, knows when the global economy will turn around. It will turn of course, but it may have further to fall before it does turn. It's a long way of saying it's a bit of a guess.

There are three simple ways to mitigate your risk:

1) Invest with money you don't need to access for at least 3 years, preferably more.

2) Invest in the stock market on a regular basis, adding new money monthly or quarterly.

3) Invest for the long term, preferably over a minimum 5- to 10-year time period, ideally longer.

With those rules in mind, here are five FTSE 100 shares that might be worth taking a punt on. In this market, there are no guarantees, and you should definitely do your own research.

CompanyShare PriceForward P/EForward Div Yield
Aviva (LSE: AV.)298p4.211.6%
BP (LSE: BP.)486p7.87.8%
London Stock Exchange (LSE: LSE)493p8.25.8%
BHP Billiton (LSE: BLT)1165p6.74.5%
Lloyds Banking Group (LSE: LLOY)45p??0%

A couple of comments:

1) Dividends may be cut, especially at Aviva. The market is effective saying it will cut its dividend, otherwise, in theory, investors would be piling into the shares. Perhaps they are not piling in because they are simply fearful, in which case, if the dividend is held or even raised, the shares will look very cheap.

2) The Lloyds selection is a pure punt. There is a decent chance the bank could be nationalised, in which case shareholders would likely end up with nothing. If the bank can get through this rather sticky patch, with its dominant share of the UK mortgage market, the shares could soar from here. If you are going to invest in Lloyds, make sure it is money you can afford to completely lose.

Absolute Bargains

From today’s prices, when we look back in 5 or 10 years' time, I'm confident we'll see how there were some absolute bargains out there in stock-market land in the early part of 2009.

Stating the obvious, picking the right companies is the key to success. For every Tullow Oil (LSE: TLW), up 1,250% over the past 10 years, there is a bankrupt Woolworths. The other key to success is to avoid a permanent loss of capital.

I could for example take a punt on a whole heap of distressed business, ones such as Punch Taverns (LSE: PUB) or Johnson Press (LSE: JPR), hoping one or two recover and earn me 10 times my money. But right now, there is more chance of shareholders being completely wiped out than of me making my 'investing' fortune.

Over at our premium share-recommendation service Champion Shares, Maynard Paton focuses intently on avoiding permanent losses of capital. In this market, he doesn't get it right every time, but he definitely makes sure the odds are stacked in his favour. For example, of the 24-strong Champion Shares portfolio, 19 companies last reported having a net cash position, as opposed to a net debt position. You can check out all his current recommendations now, for 30 days, for free. Just click here.

In closing, there are stock-market bargains about. The five companies highlighted above will hopefully do well over the long term. I wish you happy, prosperous and successful investing.

More: Time To Take A Punt On A Bank

> Of the companies mentioned in this article, Bruce Jackson has a beneficial holding in Berkshire Hathaway, BHP Billiton and Lloyds Banking Group, the latter bought at a much much much higher price than today’s.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

DanCorp 22 Jan 2009 , 1:12pm


BP still has major issues to resolve, as a business it is not exactly well run these days instead benefitting more from its leviathon presence than clear and effective management. There are a whole bunch of embroiled political issues on BP's plate as well as the more obvious ones surrounding resource prices and relative scarcity.

LSE has no clear distinctive competence longer-term as competition is looking to be opened-up, plus there's no sign of any take-over appeal anymore.

BHP, longer-term looks relatively solid, you need to keep an eye on the miner's debt positions as some have been carried away the last few years but the mineral rights and expertise make them a solid play given whatever current prices, oil and precious minerals are finite.

Lloyds, only a gambler would go there these days, with Brown more interested in getting re-elected than determining sound long-term policy, the future survival of the banks and our currency is in the balance ...though I guess at which point it mostly becomes a mute point if the economy tumbles!

Assuming the economy does retain some semblance of "intactness" over the next two years there no doubt will be some major winners for steadily investing through this time; I have been and own all of those commented upon (though BP was purchased and left for dividends many years ago), but honestly good companies or not I'm not so sure.

Perhaps President Obama will bail us out next and take us into the 51st state!

Ashfield100 22 Jan 2009 , 3:04pm

If you investing for over a lifetime and drip feed your money into a index tracker then you will want a weak economy. A strong economy is bad news for shares ,because investors are willing to pay a higher price for a companys and the dividend yeid drops. Over long periods the dividend yeid makes more money than the rise in price of an asset. The massive gains to be made in shares from 1974 to 1999 was because the dividend yeids were so high. In relation to earnings, the price of shares without the dividends invested were not so good. I wonder if investors who rush to put money into gold know that in bad times shares are best ,and in good times, thats the time to buy gold.

jonathanheenan3 23 Jan 2009 , 8:34am

We seem to have got to the bottom of the banking crash after a week of panic selling, or they could all crash or be nationalised! I dont believe any of the banks will go bankrupt. RBS will probably be nationalised which means the government can not afford to Nationalise Lloyds without risking bankrupting Britain. Maybe a good opportunity to chick some money at lloyds and Barclays and close your eyes, fingers crossed. I do like Aviva in the longer term, and BP as it has a product everyone wants that will run out one day. Dont like investing in holes in the ground, BHP, dont understand LSE

MooBear1 23 Jan 2009 , 10:17am

DanCorp, what do you mean 'Brown is only interested in getting re-elected'?

When did he get elected in the first place? ;-)

bob1023 23 Jan 2009 , 10:37am

I just increased my holding in National Grid. Not a brillian performer but a safe haven at any rate.

DavidT67 23 Jan 2009 , 3:17pm

Too right! The country didn't elect Gordon Brown!

Why is everyone so focused on the UK and the FTSE100?

The UK is an ex growth economy overburdened with service industries which produce nothing.
High time to look further afield.

I suggest asset allocation based on World GDP and that indicates you should have substantially less than 10% of your portfolio invested in the UK.

Grobbendonk 28 Jan 2009 , 10:19am

I have to agree with DanCorp about BP. I worked in the trading business unit for a while, and got out when it became apparent that it was in a terminal downward spiral. If that business unit is indicative of the way the rest of the company is being run, then BP has a long struggle to come. We'll need the oil for the foreseeable future, but most of BPs recent profits have been made by business areas that are now in complete disarray and will be for a couple of years at least.

Varlic 29 Jan 2009 , 10:09am

DavidT67: "The UK is an ex growth economy overburdened with service industries which produce nothing."

Actually London is (and has always been) a global magnet for serious world-class talent across a number of sectors. In times of global disruption, I'd place my money on that entrepreneurial talent figuring out what comes next and getting those industries and capabilities in place. Now if only our government could stop meddling with punitive taxes, populist growth-stunting policies and ill-informed operational nannying.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.