Rebuild Your Portfolio For 2009

Published in Investing on 23 December 2008

Here's a five-point plan to recoup this year's losses.

Here are three awful facts about the stock market in 2008:

* It plunged 35%;
* It hit levels first seen in 1996, and;
* About 95% of shares lost money.

It seems this year will be the market's worst since 1974 and I'm sure your shares suffered in the meltdown. Certainly the Champion Shares portfolio did not escape the carnage. During 2008, I published 31 'buy' recommendations for the Fool's share-tipping service. They covered 18 different companies of which 13 were recommended twice. At 22nd December 2008, the average loss from those 31 tips was 14.8%* and only seven showed a profit*. The comparable loss from the FTSE All-Share index was 17.2%*.

So what now for 2009 and Champion Shares? Here's my five-point plan to recoup those losses during next year and beyond:

1. First, I'll keep on ignoring the market: At the start of 2008, I never foresaw the FTSE losing 35% by December, crashing 20% one week in October and gyrating up to 10% either way on particular days. So I'm not going to waste time guessing how the index will perform next year... or any other!

2. Instead, I'm just going to look for good, cheap shares: I'm pretty confident sticking with a simple, fundamental-based approach is likely to pay off for Champion Shares over the next few years. In my view, backing shares that boast cash-strong balance sheets, employ owner-orientated managers and sport modest valuations remains the mostly likely route to long-term investment success.

3: I'll use my watch list, too: I have my sights on a number of time-tested businesses for Champion Shares in 2009, including supermarket Tesco (LSE: TSCO), engineering group Renishaw (LSE: RSW) and inkjet specialist Domino Printing Sciences (LSE: DNO). When I think their share prices become too cheap, the Champion Shares community will be the first to know.

4 And of course I'll refer to my existing 'buy' list: There is no shortage of well-run, cash-rich contenders I could 'top up' on during 2009. Current possibilities in the Champion Shares portfolio include lighting firm FW Thorpe, (LSE: TFW), spread-bet dealer IG Group (LSE: IGG) and software titan Microsoft (Nasdaq: MSFT). I could happily re-tip those three shares next year.

5 Finally, I'll try to avoid trouble: I didn't tip any banks, builders and miners during 2008 and I feel the total collapse of those sectors is likely to reverberate throughout 2009. Falling knives, such as debt-heavy pubs, retailers, car dealers and media firms, is another area that is likely to waste time and money next year. Most I fear will muddle along with a rights issue -- or go under.

What now?

As I say, the Champion Shares portfolio did not escape this year's carnage. But I'm confident my five-step plan should help the Champion Shares community recoup their losses during 2009 and beyond. I feel the Champion Shares mix of solid balance sheets, proven leaders and modest valuations should lead to index-beating returns -- regardless of when the credit crunch is resolved and the market in general picks up.

Of course there are no guarantees with my recommendations. Any of them could lose you money over time.

If you feel my five-point plan is a sensible course of action, I'd encourage you to take advantage of this free 30-day no-obligation trial to the Champion Shares service. The trial provides full access to every recommendation plus details of numerous other share ideas as well. I hope you can take up the offer.

Merry Christmas, happy investing... and the best of luck for 2009!

* Champion Shares returns are based on mid prices taken at the time of recommendation and include due dividends but exclude costs. FTSE All-Share returns are based on the FTSE All-Share total return index, which includes re-invested dividends and excludes costs, taken at the time of recommendation.

Risk Warning

You run the risk of losing money when investing in shares. Prices may change quickly, they may go down as well as up and you may not get back the full amount invested. You should not invest using money you cannot afford to lose. We have taken all reasonable care to ensure that all statements of fact and opinion contained in this publication are fair and accurate in all material aspects. Investors should seek appropriate professional advice from their stockbroker or other adviser if any points are unclear. Champion Shares gives general advice only, and the investments mentioned may not necessarily be suitable for any individual.

Authorised by The McHattie Group, St Brandon's House, 29 Great George Street, Bristol BS1 5QT | Tel: 01179 200 070 | Fax: 01179 200 071 | E-mail: enquiries@mchattie.co.uk

The McHattie Group is authorised and regulated by the Financial Services Authority

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

jonathanheenan3 24 Dec 2008 , 10:51am

Seems sensible. Should be commended for releasing his results, if only all were so honest

pdcovers 28 Dec 2008 , 8:49am

And remember shares go down as well as up. Never put all your money into one basket (of shares). No one advisor (or even TMF) knows everything about shares and investments.
Don't be greedy and accept modest returns. Put some of your remaining money into government guaranteed index-linked savings certificates from NS&I.

pdcovers 28 Dec 2008 , 8:51am

Most important of all - If it sounds too good to be true then it is!

ggpessimist 28 Dec 2008 , 11:02am

So Champion investors are expected to pay for portfolio advice which accorsing to TMF figurees has beaten the index by a mere 2.4%.
Anybody avoiding banks, property & building materials would have done better: you didnt need much brain to see that these were disasters waiting to happen.

I suppose tho' it's a very good record compared to wonderwoman Nicola Horlick who couldn't be arsed to investigate Madoff properly before investing 10% of her clients funds: one wonders why the Serious Fraud office aren't investigating her.

TonyBritten 28 Dec 2008 , 2:52pm

I have to say to "ggpessimist" that with regard to your brain view on banks you are quite wrong. Banks were (and should be) the safest shares you could have in any portfolio. Although I am now retired I was a professionally qualified and experienced clearing banker. What was happening we didn't know about - 'off balance sheet lending in dodgy areas' and the the subtle change in bank branches where they became 'sales units' with the management and staff having "targets" - a trough of pigs swill instead of maintaning quality services and not pushing products.
So where now? You have to focus on the Olympic Games . . . what is urgently needed to ensure they take off in 2012. Some areas in the economy are going to be active, which ones? that's your choice.
On another plain the Eastern European invasion into our construction industry went back home again, so where are all the skilled workers and who is going to build Gordon Browns millions of homes? roads, general infra structures and of course everyone has to eat and wear clothes even if we are burdened with Tax. So there you - long slow haul ahead.

ggpessimist 28 Dec 2008 , 5:11pm

Never been a banker so at one level must respect Tonybrittens view. But surely anyone who could was dumping bank shares after Northern Rock debacle & common sense suggested that lending policies to property in particular by 'ordinary ' bankers were bound to lead to tears. In many ways sadly it has been a long time since banks & bankers have been the respected pillars of society they once were. Largely the flash US innvestment banker model: do we have to follow everything the New York spivs do?

countrymusic 28 Dec 2008 , 7:19pm

Or obtain a yield of six percent by purchasing a property with a huge potential for expansion in six self-contained flats fully let to good working tenants (under one title) on assured shorthold tenancies and in an ideal location. This purchase would include full management/ service costs as prevailing for a further period of two years- the purchaser need do nothing in these respects but enjoy the benefits of their investment FOR TWO YEARS AND INCLUDING ASSISTANCE GIVEN INTO ENHANCING THIS ASSET-- TEL 07546 335257

ggpessimist 28 Dec 2008 , 8:08pm

And be unable to borrow more than about 60% of value & watch the value drop by 15-20% next year.
Mind you as with all property , if you can hold through the bad times , it will come right eventually it's just that from the 1989 collapse, in some areas you had to wait 8 years to get back to the price paid.

No rush on property unless you can buy at seriously distressed prices i.e.30% ish off peak.

Chongq 30 Dec 2008 , 9:58am

Just play safe with growth & foreign currency earnings: BP+RR+BHP+Tesco+BG and if you are a little daring Xtrata for 2009.
Good luck

CunningCliff 30 Dec 2008 , 7:21pm

One of my core holdings, pharmaceutical giant GlaxoSmithKline, did well this year, falling just 20p to 1259p in 2008. Phew, three cheers for GSK!

Cliff0

SteveGrr 31 Dec 2008 , 9:16am

How good GSK looks depends on when you measure the start and finish. Although today they are around the same price as they started the year, they have been as high as 1385 and as low as 995. If you are a long term investor you will have seen them fall from a peak of over 2000 at the turn of the millennium when most of the Market was rising. The reason is that the value of pharmas is linked to their research pipeline and patent expiries and this cycle operates independently of the financial markets' boom and bust.

Saveaholic 02 Jan 2009 , 2:22pm

My wife worked for a bank as a professional mortgage and loan advisor. She resigned after being over-ruled several times after turning people down for loans she knew they wouldn't be able to repay, and being pressured to make 'sales targets' she knew were crazy. She left the bank for a job elsewhere, and sold a huge wodge of the shares at the top of the market, just before they went into free-fall.

Her view was that if she wanted to be nothing but a sales girl, she'd have gone to work in a shoe shop. And she knew it would all end in tears.

It's a pity those at the top didn't have her sense.

wpannuitant 03 Jan 2009 , 4:54pm

Those at the top didn't have her sense because they weren't playing the same game. They had their own kind of sense. It's called OPM (other peoples' money). Getting the big bonuses - right? And they still are - right? Out of Govt. money - right? And they would be using it to pay dividends if Darling hadn't stopped it - right?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.