Skip Navigation
 

Heaven Help Us All

Published in Investing on 22 September 2008

George Bush’s US$700 billion bazooka gun has been fired, but it doesn’t come free. The penalty will be felt here in the UK and across the globe for years to come.

Wow!

The shocks just don’t stop coming.

The FTSE 100’s 8.84% rise on Friday was its best one-day performance since its introduction in 1984.

Royal Bank of Scotland (LSE: RBS) was the biggest winner, jumping an astonishing 32% on the day, with Barclays (LSE: BARC) not far behind, up 29%. Beleaguered HBOS (LSE: HBOS) also soared 29% higher.

The party continued over on Wall Street Friday evening as the Dow Jones soared another 369 points or 3.4%. It completed the biggest 2-day rise since the sharemarket crash of 1987.

Big George Fires The Bazooka

By now you probably know all about George Bush’s bazooka – the plan for a US$700 billion emergency fund set up to enable the US Government to buy troubled mortgage debt from banks. It’s a last ditch attempt to once and for all ensure some stability for the global banking system.

On top of that, the US and UK and other world markets have banned or severely curbed the practice of short-selling. [Read The Motley Fool’s Idiot Guide to short-selling.]

Clearly world markets believe the US emergency plan will be passed by Congress, hence the huge market rallies. In fact, given the quotes by the two men charged with dealing with this mess, there is absolutely no other option.

“If we don’t get this, it will be nothing short of a disaster for our markets” – US Federal reserve chairman Ben Bernanke.

“If it doesn’t pass, then heaven help us all” – US Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson.

A Pricked Bubble Has No Mercy

Given those comments, I am absolutely sure the emergency rescue package will be passed. But what does it all mean?

Hopefully it will free up credit markets so that they work in a ‘normal’ fashion again. You remember the way banking used to work? A bank takes deposits from savers and then lends out that money, and a little bit more, to companies and individuals. It’s called borrowing short and lending long. The bank makes its money on the difference between the interest rate it pays the savers and the interest rate it charges the lenders.

But there is a penalty to be paid. The giant house-price bubble has well and truly been pricked, and is deflating rapidly.

Many highly indebted home owners still have huge mortgage bills to pay. They can’t sell and trade-down, because the house will likely be worth considerably less than the value of their mortgage. Heaven help them if they lost their job.

The Heavy Price All Of Us Must Pay

US residents have a heavy price to pay, one which will reverberate around the globe, including here in the UK.

In the ensuing years, US citizens will have to contend with a combination of the following…

• Higher inflation, as the government effectively prints more money to pay for all the mortgages it is soon to take onto its books.

• Because the US has a huge and growing debt, any responsible government will surely scale back its budget spending plans and/or increase taxes. That means less money to spend on infrastructure upgrades, education, welfare and health, to name a few. Depending on which party gets into power, it may mean higher taxes for higher earners. Good luck to Barack Obama or John McCain – I think they’ll need it.

• There will just be a lower growth rate altogether. For too long we’ve been spoilt by the goldilocks economy of low inflation and steady growth. It was all part of the housing bubble and financial engineering which is quickly unravelling before our very eyes. We’ve now got to look forward to the much less palatable scenario of low growth and high inflation.

Kiss Goodbye To The Plasma TV

In a nutshell, for consumers around the globe, it’s a time for hunkering down and just getting through the next couple of years without any major hiccups. In a world of higher unemployment, it will mean lower wage growth and less opportunity for promotion. Jobs will become even less secure.

People will have to cut back on discretionary expenditure – and that means saying no to the plasma TVs, new cars, luxury holiday and the like. It means saving any spare money you can, and cutting down on things like energy bills and mobile phone bills. It means shopping around for a better mortgage, lower insurance premiums and a higher savings rate.

[You can compare and switch mortgages, credit cards, savings accounts, insurance and gas and electricity right here at The Motley Fool. Check us out today – you may be surprised how much you can save.]

Where Next For The Stock Market?

As for the stock market, it’s still virtually impossible to predict the direction of the market in the short-term. Banking and financial stocks in general will remain very volatile. It remains to be seen whether the huge gains of last week can be held.

Sentiment may be helped by the news overnight that Wall Street’s last two remaining independent investment banks, Goldman Sachs (NYSE: GS) and Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS), will become banks regulated by the Federal Reserve. It will allow the firms to access direct loans from the central bank, providing them with increased liquidity. The upshot will likely be that the banks no longer will have to consider being forced to sell to retail banks, as did Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) , Bear Stearns, and to some extent, Lehman Brothers.

Just by looking at the share price movements on Friday, I get the feeling there were some knee jerk over-reactions, some of which I expect will be somewhat reversed in the ensuing days and weeks. Friday was a combination of a relief-rally, a scramble by hedge funds to close out short positions, and some panic buying combined with pure gambling.

Give Me A Boring Market Any Day

The best strategy remains to sleep through it all. The second best strategy, which is similar to the first, is not to panic sell or panic buy. Sometime relatively soon, markets will stabilise and a base will be formed.

Personally, I’m looking forward to a boring day on the markets, a day when they neither flying higher nor plunge lower. Bring back the days when share prices move in a reaction to normal things, like a trading statement, interim or final results, or some economic data.

But don’t hold your breath. Despite last week’s huge rises, fear and pessimism remain the over-riding forces driving this market, notwithstanding the firing of Ben Bernanke, Henry Paulson and George Bush’s US$700 billion bazooka.

These remain interesting and unpredictable times.

> Check out The Motley Fool Sharedealing Service. It’s cheap and cheerful.

> Of the companies mentioned in this article, Bruce Jackson has a beneficial interest in HBOS and Barclays.

Like this article? Get our best articles delivered direct to your inbox at no cost. Sign up for Foolwatch Daily by entering your email below.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

oncebitten102 23 Sep 2008 , 2:24pm

Why don't we hear more about what would happen if these idiots who have damaged our economies were not rescued with tax-payers' money? Why not let them rot on the vine? Don't bale them out! They behaved stupidly, why should the rest of us suffer? The liars who had no jobs and no income who signed up to mortgages; the crooks who signed them up for fat commissions; the financial geniuses who bought the mortgages; the dunderheads who could not foresee that the US interest rates might just rise from their then low levels; and, finally, that clown Clinton, one of whose first acts as President was to pass some law which gave those at the bottom of the heap the opportunity to get into the housing market! typical lefty, all heart and no brains!
Henry Gordon

gordonbanks42 23 Sep 2008 , 3:46pm

oncebitten102: Nice idea, but only viable for those who own their houses freehold, have market gardens large enough to feed themselves for the next five years and generally don't want or need to "play" in the economy. The rest of us have to face the fact that these instutions have money we need to carry on in a fashion something like normal and allowing them to fail would be cutting off our noses to spite our faces.
A workable variation on the theme, however, would be to make sure that while the institutions involved are recapitalised and survive, the people who did the damage are dragged out and shot (OK - metaphorically if you like).
Let's start with Mrs T, as her "reform" of the mortgage lending industry in this country in 1986 created the structure which allowed (encouraged?) British mortgage lenders to create credit willy-nilly. Houses are primarily places to live and only secondarily investments. In fact a house is only an investment at all when you have somewhere else to live if you lose it. Most of us can't afford to buy a house using credit which can be taken away again at the borrower's whim, so where's the point in de-coupling mortgage lending from retail deposits?
The answer, of course, is that Mrs T needed the lenders to come up with enough dosh to float Right to Buy, but since that's all over we could now go back (gradually) to the pre-1986 structure. It's less exciting, but stabler. Just like Lloyds TSB in fact.

gordonbanks42 23 Sep 2008 , 3:48pm

Whoops - in my posting above, "borrower's whim" should have read "lender's whim".

LandOfConfusion 24 Sep 2008 , 4:48am

> oncebitten102 23 Sep 2008, 2:24pm
>
> Why don't we hear more about what would happen if
> these idiots who have damaged our economies were
> not rescued with tax-payers' money?

I don't know. I would ask Tony Blair but he changed jobs and went to work for a financial giant (JP Morgan). Oh hang on a sec...

> Why not let them rot on the vine?

It all boils down to confidence. TB (and Mr Brown) have allowed economic policy and direction to be controlled not by governments (though regulation) but though financial markets. Now that these markets are in a bad way (because of reckless greed) we would all duffer if they went down.

Our economy needs and has always needed a certain degree of cash flow (liquidity). If the worlds financial markets were to fail, this liquidity would collapse and we would have a depression.

Put another way TB, Brown, Bush and yes to some extent Clinton have dug this hole and now the governments of the world are having to fill it - with our money.

> That clown Clinton, one of whose first acts as
> President was to pass some law which gave those
> at the bottom of the heap the opportunity to get
> into the housing market!

Which law? As far as I can see, this problem was caused by a failing of monetary policy, which began in 2002. In other words it happened during the term of that great intellectual of our times president Bush.

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.