As US Stocks Tumble, Lloyds Buys HBOS For 232p Per Share

Published in Investing on 18 September 2008

Throw out the rule book. This time it really is different. US stocks fall another 4%, adding to the global financial crisis. It all confirms HBOS had to be bought, and fast.

"This time it's different" are the four most expensive words in the investing language.— Sir John Templeton

But this time it really is different.

The very fabric of capitalism is under serious threat. The banking system has frozen. Hundreds of years old banking organisations are disappearing in the blink of an eye.

Desperate times call for desperate measures.

The events surrounding yesterday’s Lloyds TSB (LSE: LLOY) takeover talks with HBOS (LSE: HBOS) are well documented in this outstanding article by fellow Fool contributor Stuart Watson.

These days I live in Australia. Down here, the US market closes at 6am local time, the Australian market opens at 10am and closes at 4pm, almost in time for the UK market to open at 5pm. For stock market traders, it has been heaven. It’s probably now hell, just like it is most places around the world.

The past few days, as you’ve slept (you have been able to sleep, haven’t you?) I’ve been watching the news wires from the US with utter amazement. The article I wrote last night UK time was out of date virtually before it was even published.

Lloyds Agrees To Buy HBOS For £2.32 Per Share

Foolishly, I thought shares were going to soar yesterday. I was right. Briefly. Compounding my foolishness, I said it was hard to imagine HBOS shares being worth less than they were yesterday, in a few year’s time. As I write, HBOS won’t exist as a separate entity in a few year’s time. In a matter of hours, they have been gobbled up by Lloyds TSB.

As you slept, details of the Lloyds TSB were coming through. According to the BBC, the boards of the two companies agreed to an all share deal valuing HBOS at 232p per share. Official confirmation came though at 7am this morning…

“Under the terms of the Acquisition, HBOS Shareholders will receive 0.83 Lloyds TSB Shares for every 1 HBOS Share. The offer values HBOS at £12.2 billion (based on Lloyds TSB's closing price on 17 September 2008 of 279.75 pence).”

You can read the full announcement here.

A combined Lloyds TSB and HBOS will dominate the UK banking scene. As Stuart Watson’s article said yesterday…

“In terms of mortgages, HBOS has 20% of the mortgage and Lloyds TSB has around 10%. The combination of the two, with mortgages totalling some £350 billion, will be three times larger than their nearest competitors Abbey and Nationwide, each of which have around 10% of the market.

The combined firm will also dominate personal current accounts with a 33% market share, twice the size of the next largest player.”

Mr Unpopular Gordon Brown Strikes Again

The deal was apparently brokered by none other than Prime Minister Gordon Brown himself. Some sections of the media, and more than a few investors, including some here on the Banking Sector discussion board at The Motley Fool, have sharply criticised the process and the outcome of this banking merger.

Whilst the process – the deliberate leaking of the Lloyds TSB/HBOS merger talks to BBC journalist Robert Peston – has clearly not followed the rules, as I said above, these are desperate times, and desperate times call for desperate measures. This time it really is different.

Mr Unpopular Gordon Brown has probably not helped his popularity rating. The rescue of HBOS at a knock down share price is not going to go down well with the 2.1 million small HBOS shareholders.

The merger with Lloyds is going to result in redundancies and branch closures. Indeed there have already been estimates as high as 40,000 job losses and 1,000 branch closures, should the deal go ahead. It won’t be popular amongst them.

Finally, there are competition issues. The combined Lloyds TSB/HBOS (surely to be called LLOS) will have around 30% of the UK’s mortgage market, totalling some £350 billion, making it three times larger than their nearest competitors. The combined firm will also dominate personal current accounts with a 33% market share, twice the size of the next largest player.

Well Done Gordon Brown

My Foolish cap goes off to Gordon Brown and those other Government, Treasury and regulatory boffins who brokered this deal. They may not get much thanks for it, and Mr Brown will probably not be Prime Minister after the next election, if not before, but in terms of dealing swiftly and practically to this financial crisis, they deserve great praise.

In hindsight, the demise of HBOS was obvious on Monday. The fact that it has been bought, rather than nationalised like Northern Rock, is a massive result for the Government.

Competition issues can be negotiated later, once this whole financial crisis finishes playing out. The process had some flaws, but this was all about outcome. Desperate times.

It’s Not Over Yet – The Lloyds TSB Share Price Will Remain Volatile

Of course this doesn’t end the whole financial crisis. Lloyds TSB’s share price (and therefore the share price of HBOS, until the deal is finalised) will likely remain extremely volatile. There are still plenty of financial institutions around the globe who are seen to be in trouble.

Last night in the US, the Dow Jones Industrial Average plummeted another 450 points, or 4%. Disturbingly, the share prices of Wall Street’s last two remaining independent investment banks – Morgan Stanley (NYSE: MS) and Goldman Sachs (LSE: GS) – lost 24% and 14% respectively. Are they next?

Bloomberg is reporting Morgan Stanley is weighing a merger with Wachovia (NYSE: WB) and several other banks. Wachovia, the fourth latest US bank, is not without its problems either, as judged by its own 21% share price fall yesterday.

As Good As Putting Your Money Under Your Bed

Here in Australia, shares in our largest investment bank Macquarie Group (ASX: MQG) slumped over 20%. Back in the US, the nation's oldest money fund, Reserve Primary did what no competitor had done since 1994 – allow its net asset value to fall below $1 a share, or break the buck. That means investors today wouldn’t get back all the money they’ve invested in the fund. It’s a huge blow to the industry's reputation as the safest place for money after bank deposits and U.S. Treasury debt.

It makes you think…is anything safe? Gold jumped 9% or US$70 an ounce overnight and 3-month US Treasury Yields fell to virtually zero, about the same rate of interest you’ll get if you put your money under the bed.

No Answers Yet

As I’ve done for the past few days, I’ll end by saying I don’t have any answers at the moment. This market is so unpredictable that any investment or prediction right now is little more than a gamble.

The whole debt fuelled bubble lasted at least 5 years, probably longer. The popping of the bubble is happening before our very eyes, in very fast motion. I have a gut feeling the worst may be closer to being over than not, but it’s just a guess.

The reverberations will carry on for years, if not decades. As for me, as well as nursing a very battered and bruised share portfolio, I’m going to keep and frame the front pages of the financial newspapers, to remind me of these extraordinary times long into the future.

Hang in there.

> Join in on the discussion on our very popular Banking Sector discussion board to get up to the minute reactions to the latest developments as they break.
> Of the companies mentioned in this article, Bruce Jackson has a beneficial interest in HBOS.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Colsbest 18 Sep 2008 , 12:04pm

The great thing about getting older is that you see things that everyone says is unique and then realise that you have been here before.
Just take your eyes off stocks and shares for a moment and consider the £1. Why do I think that it is in for a hammering? The government is overborrowed, massively, with hidden debts (Public Private Finance for example)that it cannot sustain. They know full well that the only real answer to the financial woes of UKPLC is to cut government spending and return money to the people (tax custs)but they cannot because their hands are tied. But what makes it worse is the fact that corporate and personal tax reveues will slide dramatically in the next 12 to 18 months. Now then all your economic experts, what happens when you have outgoings that cannot be covered by incomings - you go bust old son, that's what. Like I said, I've been here before and right now I'm selling sterling as fast as I can.

philidor 18 Sep 2008 , 7:12pm

"Broker" is not a verb

audiobloke 19 Sep 2008 , 7:35am

Philidor, back to school for you treacle chops... Broker can be a verb. As the teacher no doubt used to write on your homework: "2/10... See Me"

freelanderfilly 19 Sep 2008 , 7:58am

Philidor, don't be anal. As Audiobloke confirms, it can be, and really, in the light of something so serious, did that really add anything to this? Did it?

xpi0t0s 19 Sep 2008 , 8:12am

Yep, from a British English dictionary (not an American dictionary, cos they'll verb just about anything, and I looked up "color" just to make sure they got it right - no definition but a reference to the correctly spelt "colour"):

verb [T]
to arrange something such as a deal, agreement, etc. between two or more groups or countries:
The foreign ministers have failed in their attempts to broker a ceasefire.

(from Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/

sockmonster 19 Sep 2008 , 8:50am

Colsbest - you're selling sterling and buying..? Dollars, euros?

TimeValue 19 Sep 2008 , 9:30am

Colsbest, The other way of dealing with the overspend is to provoke high inflation. It's easy you do, just a few duff decisions and you could even pull it off with a bit of plausible deniability. If money halves in value over the next couple of years, the current debt level becomes much more managable. A ticky thing to control, but what's the alternative.
Make a note in your diary to look back in a say three years to see if I'm right.

Philidor, You can pick holes in this but I'm working class and I don't give a stuff about grammar, spellng or syntax.

204panadil 19 Sep 2008 , 10:44am

There's nothing wrong with being working class as I am and as TimeValue says he is, but it doesn't mean you have to be illiterate and ignorant as well. You can see the results of that attitude in the mistakes that now crowd the pages of our newspapers and magazines which used to be corrected by knowledgeable working-class compositors and proof-readers.
On the recession, I grew up during the 1930's and World War II - no credit cards, cars or bank accounts for the workers then and no foreign holidays either. I don't think we were less happy than today's children.

18220 19 Sep 2008 , 6:33pm

As a pub landlady my partner and I have over the last year reverted to paying cash for everything it has been easy to do this in the current climate as we have been told in no uncertain terms that even after 10 years in the same business and working with a £750.00 overdraft we are not creditworthy as the banks have lost confidence in pubs.
We are saving ourselves a phenomenal amount in bank charges and have found the deals to be had are huge if paying in cash in this uncertain time, we have even bartered a wedding reception with all the trimmings for a plumbig job for the gents loos, bring back the old times at least I talk to my suppliers now.

molkapolka 19 Sep 2008 , 10:47pm

Can anyone tell me where and how to buy gold?

Colsbest 18 Sep 2008 , 12:04pm

The great thing about getting older is that you see things that everyone says is unique and then realise that you have been here before.
Just take your eyes off stocks and shares for a moment and consider the £1. Why do I think that it is in for a hammering? The government is overborrowed, massively, with hidden debts (Public Private Finance for example)that it cannot sustain. They know full well that the only real answer to the financial woes of UKPLC is to cut government spending and return money to the people (tax custs)but they cannot because their hands are tied. But what makes it worse is the fact that corporate and personal tax reveues will slide dramatically in the next 12 to 18 months. Now then all your economic experts, what happens when you have outgoings that cannot be covered by incomings - you go bust old son, that's what. Like I said, I've been here before and right now I'm selling sterling as fast as I can.

philidor 18 Sep 2008 , 7:12pm

"Broker" is not a verb

audiobloke 19 Sep 2008 , 7:35am

Philidor, back to school for you treacle chops... Broker can be a verb. As the teacher no doubt used to write on your homework: "2/10... See Me"

freelanderfilly 19 Sep 2008 , 7:58am

Philidor, don't be anal. As Audiobloke confirms, it can be, and really, in the light of something so serious, did that really add anything to this? Did it?

xpi0t0s 19 Sep 2008 , 8:12am

Yep, from a British English dictionary (not an American dictionary, cos they'll verb just about anything, and I looked up "color" just to make sure they got it right - no definition but a reference to the correctly spelt "colour"):

verb [T]
to arrange something such as a deal, agreement, etc. between two or more groups or countries:
The foreign ministers have failed in their attempts to broker a ceasefire.

(from Cambridge Advanced Learner's Dictionary)
http://dictionary.cambridge.org/

sockmonster 19 Sep 2008 , 8:50am

Colsbest - you're selling sterling and buying..? Dollars, euros?

TimeValue 19 Sep 2008 , 9:30am

Colsbest, The other way of dealing with the overspend is to provoke high inflation. It's easy you do, just a few duff decisions and you could even pull it off with a bit of plausible deniability. If money halves in value over the next couple of years, the current debt level becomes much more managable. A ticky thing to control, but what's the alternative.
Make a note in your diary to look back in a say three years to see if I'm right.

Philidor, You can pick holes in this but I'm working class and I don't give a stuff about grammar, spellng or syntax.

204panadil 19 Sep 2008 , 10:44am

There's nothing wrong with being working class as I am and as TimeValue says he is, but it doesn't mean you have to be illiterate and ignorant as well. You can see the results of that attitude in the mistakes that now crowd the pages of our newspapers and magazines which used to be corrected by knowledgeable working-class compositors and proof-readers.
On the recession, I grew up during the 1930's and World War II - no credit cards, cars or bank accounts for the workers then and no foreign holidays either. I don't think we were less happy than today's children.

18220 19 Sep 2008 , 6:33pm

As a pub landlady my partner and I have over the last year reverted to paying cash for everything it has been easy to do this in the current climate as we have been told in no uncertain terms that even after 10 years in the same business and working with a £750.00 overdraft we are not creditworthy as the banks have lost confidence in pubs.
We are saving ourselves a phenomenal amount in bank charges and have found the deals to be had are huge if paying in cash in this uncertain time, we have even bartered a wedding reception with all the trimmings for a plumbig job for the gents loos, bring back the old times at least I talk to my suppliers now.

molkapolka 19 Sep 2008 , 10:47pm

Can anyone tell me where and how to buy gold?

Join the conversation

Please take note - some tags have changed.

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: [b]bolded text[/b], [i]italicised text[/i]. All other tags will be removed from your post.

If you want to add a link, please ensure you type it as http://www.fool.co.uk as opposed to www.fool.co.uk.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.