Skip Navigation
 

Is Big Oil Too Cheap?

<%=_author %>

By

Stuart J Watson

From the Fool blog

Turbulent markets

Published in Investing on 23 July 2008

The price of oil has quadrupled over the last five years but neither BP nor Royal Dutch Shell has outperformed the FTSE 100 index over this period.

Next week will see the latest quarterly results from the two oil giants in the FTSE 100, BP (LSE: BP) and Royal Dutch Shell (LSE: RDSB). BP reports on Tuesday and Shell on Thursday.

No doubt there will be the usual gnashing of teeth about the size of profits and various calculations made about how many pounds per second each company is making. 

However, both companies have a profit margin of less than 10% after tax -- hardly excessive -- and their combined profits from their worldwide operations is roughly equivalent to the money government takes in fuel duty and associated VAT. But that’s enough politics. We’re here to review the companies’ investment credentials.

Surprise

One thing that may surprise many people is that although the price of oil has quadrupled over the last five years, the shares of both BP and Shell have performed the same as the rest of the FTSE 100. Although both firms have raised the prices they charge, their costs have risen dramatically too, meaning that their profit margins have remained more or less the same as they were five years ago.

On the production front, things have not been that bright either. BP’s daily production rose from 3.6 million to 3.8 million barrels of oil equivalent from 2003 to 2007. Shell’s production fell from 3.9 million to 3.2 million over the same period.

So which companies have been making the most money from the oil boom? The latest FT500 survey of the largest quoted companies made interesting reading in this regard. The top four slots were occupied by oil producers and they also accounted for eight out of the top fourteen slots.

But it’s the recently privatised oil companies are changing the investment landscape. While ExxonMobil is the largest company in the world, it’s being hotly pursued by PetroChina, Russia’s Gazprom and Brazil’s Petrobras, who currently occupy second, third and fourth slots respectively. Petrobras has seen its shares soar from $5 five years ago to almost $60 today. 

The dominance of oil among the largest listed companies in the world is even more remarkable when you consider that the national oil companies of Saudi Arabia, Iraq, Iran, Mexico, Venezuela and many other leading producers aren’t quoted companies, and therefore don’t appear on this list.

When you look at oil and gas reserves, nationalised and recently privatised companies have an even bigger stranglehold, holding fourteen out of the top twenty positions. 

Reserves

At current production levels, BP has enough reserves for thirteen years but Shell has just ten. Both companies have struggled to replenish their reserves in recent years and are increasingly looking at other forms of energy to reduce their dependence on oil and gas. Indeed it’s hard to find any mention of reserves when you look at Shell’s financial statements -- it’s not a figure they’re keen on publicising.

Neither company is a basket case though, which seems to be what their current share prices are implying. 

Both are valued on just seven times profits for 2008 which seems overly harsh even given their reserves predicament. Shell has a forecast dividend yield of 4.5% while BP can boast 5.3%. Oil prices may fall back of course, and they have a little already from their recent highs, but it’s hard to argue that either company is overly expensive at the moment although this analysis is admittedly simplistic.

While big oil looks like reasonable value, adventurous investors will find there are even more attractive prospects in tiny oil. Some companies look vulnerable as they may find it difficult to raise the funds they need to carry on operations, but there has been an indiscriminate sell-off in the recent stock market plunge.

As well as benefiting directly from higher oil prices, minnows are finding more oil due to more advanced exploration techniques, often on properties discarded by the majors as too small for their own purposes. Previously uneconomic deposits, in deeper waters for example, have also become financially viable.

On The Fool’s discussion boards, mid-cap oil companies such as Soco International (LSE: SIA), Dana Petroleum (LSE: DNX) and Tullow Oil (LSE: TLW) have been favourites for some years now, and many smaller oil companies are regularly appraised on the oil and gas sector board. For these companies, it’s often whether they find oil and in what quantities, rather than the oil price, that is the key determinant of their share price in the long term.

Although I suspect the easy pickings from oil have already been plucked, there’s still enough value in the sector to make it worthy of investors’ attention at the moment.

You could buy shares in an oil company via Motley Fool Sharebuilder for as little as £1.50 commission.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

harepath 24 Jul 2008, 11:06am

In the 60's I worked in the oil prospecting industry, and before the days of insider trading laws, several of my colleagues invested in companies which had discovered very promising oil fields. To their chagrin, the share price dropped when the discoveries were made public. The market knew that the discoveries needed massive capital investment, which would reduce dividends! OK for long-term investment, though.

mahdave 24 Jul 2008, 6:54pm

One word comes to mind when announcements are made by our biggest TAX PAYERS:Press Jealousy!
If successful, you are damned.If failing,ridiculed. Nobody mentions number of un-succesful wells before luckily finding a . I believe, the captains of OUR such companies who single-handedly fuel our modern,socialist state, should have permanent in Her Majesty's palace court.
Moving to the second point: Crude price does not automatically translate into equivalent SE prices. Reason; I suspect the only weakness with out benefactors is the blundering financial directos who SELL FORWARD at the wrong prices at wrong times.Please God! inspire them suitably.

Sennid 25 Jul 2008, 1:28pm

This article clearly shows that the real profiteers are OPEC members.
If drug companies making malaria pills colluded like OPEC, there would be screams of outrage at the UN
Oil costs very little to pump - the Arab price-fixing through under-production creates profits that are OBSCENE!!!
Meanwhile 3rd world countries cannot afford to manufacture fertiliser, run tractors, farm equipment, harvesters, trucks to market etc because of Arab price-fixing.
Innocent children are dying of starvation and disease whilst the Arabs build ugly, gross buildings, ski runs in the desert, buy personal Jumbo jets and purchase half of London.
Meanwhile, the world sits idly by and does nothing – not even the slightest criticism of Fat-Cat-Arab- Greed.
The UN needs to audit the cost of pumping a barrel of oil and the decide on a fair profit.
OPEC member should be arrested and face charges of crimes against humanity at the Hague.
How long can this criminal farce continue???

stuartpetergraha 26 Jul 2008, 10:59am

OPEC isn't just made up of Arab, but OPEC is a cartel and cartels seek to incease prices to suit themselves. Much of the price increases are due to WESTERN based hedge funds buying futures at high prices and pushing the price right up. Plus China and India are developing fast and increasing demand for oil, increased demand with a stable supply and hey prices go up.
There may not be as much oil in Saudi as some think, so they may not be able to just pump more. Iran itself has petrol shortages, what we need to do in the West is reduce our dependance on oil full stop.
We need to kill two birds with one stone and use technology. We need to develop electric hybrid vehicles now. Makes oil vastly less relevant, saved the environment and gives us technology we can export to the third world at low cost to stop there dependance on oil.

capetownpeter 27 Jul 2008, 7:12am

Is the developing world commodity-boarding the developed?

Why?
Strange that there have been no detailled explanations for the doubling of oil this last year that have lasted more than a few days. Whoever you talk to, the explanations vary; and vary from day to day almost.
Subsidised oil? Speculators? Hedge funds? Developing countries demand? Supply-side restrictions? Threats (Iran's nuclear, Niger freedom fighters, hurricanes...). We've heard it all. No-one has systematically synthesised this into a model with predictive power.

Where?
What is just as interesting is to know where all this money is going - first out to which SWF etc; then back as investments (from eg Qatar) into which governments, markets, exchanges. Under what terms. With what financial and political objectives & consequences?

It's time to talk
It looks like the developing world is commodityboarding the developed. Its time to talk and concede freedoms in Iran, Palestine, the Islamic world etc.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.