Skip Navigation
 

Bradford & Bingley Bashed Again

<%=_author %>

By

Stuart J Watson

From the Fool blog

Office Politics

Published in Investing on 4 July 2008

Things go from bad to worse at Bradford & Bingley as its latest fundraising is rescued at the last minute by the FSA.

The rights issue at Bradford & Bingley (LSE: BB) is turning into a depressing soap opera storyline that would be worthy of EastEnders.

Here’s a quick recap of events so far. Back in mid-May B&B, with its shares at about 150p, finally admitted it needed to raise new money and launched a £325m rights issue at 82p in order to prop up its balance sheet. Less than three weeks later, its trading has deteriorated to such an extent it requires an extra £110m. The rights issue price is lowered to 55p and a US buyout group, TPG Capital, agrees to buy a 23% stake in the company to raise the additional funds required.

Another three weeks pass and B&B discloses that it is rejecting an effective takeover offer from Resolution, although terms of this deal are not revealed. Roll forward two weeks to today and with one business day to go before the rights issue and TPG deal are to be ratified, the buyout group walks away due to a get-out clause triggered by a downgrade in B&B’s credit rating.

Luckily for B&B, the FSA has strong armed a group of investors to take TPG’s place and it’s the same group that were backing the Resolution offer a few weeks before! The rights issue price remains at 55p and it continues to be fully underwritten but the shareholder vote to approve the transaction is pushed back a week to 14 July.

Predictably B&B’s share price slumped on this news. At one point they touched 52p, falling below the rights issue price for the first time. This also means B&B has joined the 90% club - its shares have now fallen by 90% since their peak back in 2006.

Private Shareholders

How many shares B&B one million or so private shareholders will be offered is yet to be revealed. The original rights issue was 16 for every 25 held but revised one increased this to 19 for every 25. The vast majority of B&B’s investors own less than 250 shares and so taking up their rights will probably cost them no more than £100.

To be frank, I’m not sure this latest news really changes things that much for shareholders. Yes, it damages management’s credibility but they had next to none left anyway and probably won’t be in charge for much longer.

The downgrade in the credit rating is hardly unexpected either. A few years ago, credit rating agencies were seen as far more thorough and forward-looking than equity analysts when it came to appraising a company’s prospects. But this is no longer the case and this downgrade appears to be a case of bolting the stable door a year after the horse has departed. It will make it slightly more expensive for B&B to fund its operations however.

The replacement of TPG with another group of investors is also of little consequence. TPG would have been keen to accept a takeover offer but then given the way the FSA has reportedly ‘encouraged’ the new group of investors to take part they’ll be looking for a swift exit too.

B&B will shortly issue a supplementary prospectus with details of the third version of its rights issue. Whether it will contain another trading update remains to be seen. The last one covered the first four months of the year but the figures for May will certainly be known by now and B&B will also have a good idea about June.

In its last update, B&B revealed that just over £1.1bn of its £41bn mortgage book was in arrears of 3 months or greater or undergoing repossession. This was a 37% increase on the figure from just four months previously.  This, and a write-down on its sub-prime investments, pushed the group into a small loss.

While B&B is often seen as a casualty of the buy-to-let market the damage has really come from self-certified loans and the £8bn of mortgages it has acquired from elsewhere. Arrears on the latter were recently running at a teeth-curling 5%.

B&B is certainly not out of the woods yet. If its trading begins to stabilise the shares could make a gradual recovery over time. That’s far from certain however and I suspect the most likely outcome is that B&B will be taken over, not necessarily at a price much further north than today.

More:   I'm Not Buying Banks  |  Bradford & Bingley & Broken

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

cardewman 05 Jul 2008, 8:23am

I note that No. 2 on your list of easy access Savings Accounts is the B & B Internet 3 account. Are you stll happy about that ?

goldenegg47 05 Jul 2008, 9:55am

why the banks need millions of pound, is it to give enomous bonuses to the chairman?

Lupatria 05 Jul 2008, 10:22am

I've also noted that B&B's e-account is number two on your list of Easy Access Savings Accounts.
This week I opened one of these accounts - but now I'm having second thoughts .......... any chance of any reassurance from you??

rabb5it 05 Jul 2008, 10:45am

I'm looking at that B&B inetsaver also. I'm happy that 35K is protected (shortly to be 50K) Northern Rock is even safer - no limit to the protection level.

bobfruit 05 Jul 2008, 11:26am

Sure the standard savings rules apply - if you're happy with the account you've opened, keep it. Your savings will be protected up to the government guaranteed limits anyway, so just largely ignore what goes on overhead. It looks like B&B will be bought out, so there's little danger of any money loss I would've thought.

What The Fool is commenting on here is the politics behind the ownership of the Company, which - whilst disturbing reading - shouldn't really have any impact on the money that's in it.

holmer55 05 Jul 2008, 12:28pm

In the worst case scenario £35k of your B&B savings will be protected, but how long will it take to get at it? Savings may be locked up for months whilst govt. gets it act together. Why take the risk? Put your cash in a safe accessible place e.g premium bonds for 12 months, then re-assess the options.

pamelams 05 Jul 2008, 1:44pm

I have a few B&B shares and I dont quite understand what I sould be doing re "the rights issue".
Do I have to take up the offer or can I just leave things as they are?
Thanks
Pam

ROGTOM100 05 Jul 2008, 2:47pm

Reading various articles on this & other sites, I keep seeing the statement that; "Bank savings are guaranteed up to £35,000". This is not so. Only the first £2,000 is 100% guaranteed. The next £33,000 receives only a 90% guarantee. Consequently, people with £35,000 invested in such institutions, should the institution go 'to the wall', could lose £3,300 of this £35,000.i.e. 10% of £33,000. After £35,000, the whole lot would be lost.
The government have announced a possible increase in this 'Safe' amount to £50,000. When? I bet it will be AFTER the market has settled, when there is little or no chance that institutions will go into liquidation.

Beware the government & banks. They speak with forked tongues.

PinkDalek1 05 Jul 2008, 3:23pm

'Reading various articles on this & other sites, I keep seeing the statement that; "Bank savings are guaranteed up to £35,000". This is not so. ...'

The statement you keep seeing is correct.

'Only the first £2,000 is 100% guaranteed. The next £33,000 receives only a 90% guarantee.'

This used to be the situation for defaults up to 30 Sepember 2007.

The current position is here:

http://www.fscs.org.uk/latest_news/deposit_compensation_limi...

PD

peepobaby 06 Jul 2008, 8:18am

Guarantees are all well and good but I wouldn't personally put my savings with B&B when there are better alternatives at the same if not better risk level. B&B's main problem is not in the UK - its that they have to buy £300m of loans every 3 months from the US sub-prime lender GMAC and the default rates on these loans went from 3% to 5% within the last three months!

The guarantee is fine. The main issue with these guarantees is that they have never been invoked in practice and there is no protocol for what would happen in such a situation. I am not clear who would be first to get their hands on money/cash but I doubt that savers will be first on the list. And if money were not available to pay back savers, would the government cover the loss? Or other banks in the guarantee scheme?

The last time we were near the situation, the government nationalised the bank, ie Northern Rock. Even if I would get my money back with interest 6 weeks later (I doubt that it could be done at this speed in practice!), I'd rather not be in that position. I personally think its about time that banks publish to consumers up to date information on their financial position so that consumers can judge the risk involved in putting your savings with them! Perhaps the FSA should publish something like this?

Finao91 06 Jul 2008, 9:22am

I decided to buy into Bradford & Bingley, I suppose my tolerance to risk is slightly higher than mosts. When their fundraising is complete their Tier 1 ratio will be at 9.8% I believe that's more than almost any other bank in Europe could well make a few pounds here if they were to recover.

One things for sure though, it'll be one hell of a ride :-).

hamdanieh2 07 Jul 2008, 9:24am

I too decided to buy into B&B. It will be interesting to say the least.

TMFArkle 08 Jul 2008, 6:32pm

Re the savings accounts and their safety.

I see the FSCS (Financial Services Compensation Scheme) as the backstop, but it's a firm backstop. You'll get up to £35,000 if B & B goes bust. There may be a delay of a few weeks but you won't lose your money.

But when all is said and done, I doubt things will get that far. Look at Northern Rock. At every stage of the process, depositors have been able to get their money out - the only delay was the length of the queue during the run, which only lasted a couple of days.

From a saver's perspective, Northern Rock was stabilised once the government issued a guarantee that all savings there were safe. And that was long before nationalisation happened. So were B &B to get into deeper trouble, I suspect there would be a government guarantee once again. But I don't know that for sure. If there is no government guarantee, then the FSCS will kick in.

And, of course, this all assumes that B & B gets close to insolvency. Clearly the bank is deep trouble, but that doesn't look like the most likely scenario to me. As Stuart Watson says in the article above, a takeover is perhaps more likely.

So, in summary, if I was a depositor/saver with B & B, I would be completely relaxed and I wouldn't be losing any sleep.

If I were a shareholder, I would be worried. Would I sell now when the share price has fallen to 34p? Tough one. I'd be tempted to bail out even now.... (Thankfully, I've never had any shares in B&B so I haven't had to worry about this. My sincere commiserations who is worrying about what to do.)

Ed

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.