Skip Navigation
 

Ten Top Trackers

<%=_author %>

By

Stuart J Watson

From the Fool blog

Local Police Station Is Useless!

Published in Investing on 11 June 2008

Index trackers are the simplest way to invest in the stock market. Here we list the ten cheapest on the UK market.

The Fool has been a fan of index trackers since it began in 1997. For the uninitiated they are investment funds which attempt the match the stock market's overall rate of return. They do this without the aid of expensive fund managers making them cheaper and hence, on average, more profitable to invest in.

Index trackers first came to the fore in the US in the 1970s. The first index tracker, the Vanguard 500 Index Fund, is still going strong over there. It's returned over 11% per annum since it was launched and now has assets of over £30bn.

Here in the UK, trackers took a little longer to catch on. The L&G UK Index Fund, now the largest UK tracker fund with over £4bn in assets, was launched in 1992. Virgin's index tracker, another popular fund with over £2bn of assets, came into being in 1995.

Who's the cheapest?

Despite the lacklustre performance of the stock market over the last decade or so, index trackers have remained popular with investors. They've gradually become cheaper too. Here's our list of the cheapest index trackers following the UK stock market.

Fund

Total
expense
ratio

Type of
fund

Index

Lump  sum
minimum

Monthly

minimum

Fidelity
Moneybuilder

0.27%

UT/OEIC

A/S

500

50

Deutsche Bank FTSE 100

0.30%

ETF

100

N/a

N/a

Lyxor FTSE 100

0.30%

ETF

100

N/a

N/a

Edinburgh UK Tracker Trust

0.33%

IT

A/S

250 

100 

F&C FTSE All Share Tracker

0.35%

UT/OEIC

A/S

1,000

50

Liontrust
Top 100

0.36%

UT/OEIC

100

2,500

N/a

iShare FTSE 100

0.40%

ETF

100

N/a

N/a

M&G Index Tracker

0.46%

UT/OEIC

A/S

500

10

L&G UK Index

0.51%

UT/OEIC

A/S

500

50

Prudential UK Index Tracker

0.51%

UT/OEIC

100

500

50

Some of terminology in the table probably needs explaining. The total expense ratio of a fund is all the costs borne by you as an investor. It includes the headline annual management charge plus other administration fees.

For index trackers, the lower the total expense ratio the better. Unfortunately, a lot of the money we have invested in index trackers here in the UK is in relatively expensive funds, the average total expense ratio being 1%. There are even a few index trackers that charge 1.5% a year, the same as an ordinary managed fund. While an extra 1% a year may not sound a lot, if you have thousands of pounds invested over the course of a few decades, it soon becomes a substantial sum. If you have a high-cost tracker, ditch it for one that's easier on the wallet.

The type of fund shows whether the tracker is a unit trust or OEIC, an investment trust or an exchange traded fund. The first is bought through a fund manager or IFA, the latter two using a stock broker or online broker (so you will have to pay a charge of around £10 or more when you buy or sell them). This makes investment trusts and ETFs more suitable for lump sum investments. If you want to invest a small amount each month then a unit trust or OEIC index tracker will work out cheaper.

The rise and rise of ETFs

Exchange traded funds are a relatively new type of investment vehicle. They were first launched in the UK in 2000 and got off to a very slow start. Three years later only four different ETFs were available. However, the last two years has seen their numbers swell from 30 to over 140 with ETFs being launched that track all major international markets, gilts, corporate bonds and even commodities such as gold and oil. iShares is the market leader and four of its funds now have assets of over £1bn.

ETFs tend to be a lot cheaper than normal investment funds and you don't have to pay stamp duty when you buy them either. Although they've helped to bring down the cost of index trackers here in the UK, the charges we pay remain expensive relative to the US. We hope that, as ETFs become more popular and grow further in size, we'll see the cost of tracking fall even lower.

The index column shows whether the fund tracks the FTSE 100 or the FTSE All Share. The latter is the best measure of the UK market, comprising of nearly 700 companies and 98% of the market's total value. The FTSE 100 index is the better known of the two. Although it only consists of the largest 100 companies it still covers around 80% of the market's total value.

The two minimum columns show how much you need to invest either as a one off or on a monthly basis via an investment plan offered by the fund manager. This doesn't apply to ETFs although some brokers do offer low-cost regular investment plans. (You could do this via Motley Fool Sharebuilder.)

Finally, a couple of notes on how I constructed this table. Both Deutsche Bank and Lyxor also offer an All Share tracker which charges 0.4% a year, but I've ignored these to provide a broader range of companies.

Also, HSBC's index tracker is available through Hargreaves Lansdown at a special rate of 0.25% a year. This is technically the cheapest UK tracker although it's not been stated how long this special rate will continue (the standard charge for this fund is 0.56% a year). If you know of any funds I've missed please add a note in the comments section below.

For more on index trackers see our ISA centre and if you're looking for a share dealing account to trade ETFs take a look at our Sharedealing service.

More: Stupid Humans Vs. The Computer | An Easy Way To Invest In Shares

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

RansomStark 11 Jun 2008, 12:24pm

Would be interesting to see opinions on non-uk tracker etf's as well.

onlyroz 11 Jun 2008, 1:09pm

I've had an L&G index tracker for about 4 months now. I'm investing £100 a month and I'm planning on using it as a pension (and when I can afford it I'll be increasing the monthly contribution).

GeorgeMix 11 Jun 2008, 1:27pm

What advantages/disadvantages over UT's, ETF's and OEIC's are there to buying an IT tracker? The Edinburgh IT tracker has a low cost savings plan and is at a discount to NAV. Anything else?

mhlgreen2 12 Jun 2008, 8:52am

If you are only interested in increasing capital, the discount on an investment trust only adds to uncertainty. But if you are interested in income, it is another story.

With an investment trust, you own more shares than if you bought the shares directly, and these extra shares pay a dividend.

Edinburgh UK tracker seems to pay a dividend of 3.5% and is at a discount of -4.3%. I calculate that if there were no discount, the yield would be 3.35%, but the dividend you get on the extra shares pays for 0.14% of the 0.33% TER.

laertes100 12 Jun 2008, 9:10am

I would also be interested in analysis of non UK trackers

Iniq 12 Jun 2008, 9:24am

I already invest about half my annual stock-and-share ISA [surely it's about time there was a more succinct name for the "non cash ISA"?] in the HSBC all-share tracker through Hargeaves Lansdown, and as far as I am aware the 0.25% charge is the ongoing rate.
To balance my investments and to give a wider geographical spread I have smaller investments in similar tracker funds for the EU, USA, Japan and Far East.
However I cannot find equivalent low-cost tracker funds for India, China, Russia, South America or the World generally.
Suggestions anyone?

Morini66 12 Jun 2008, 10:09am

How about the FTSE 250/350 trackers? I have some iShares FTSE250 (MIDD.L)
Also ETFs are fine for monthly savings, provided you find a deal on commissions. The Halifax Sharebuilder, which is re-packaged by the Fool and some SIPPS (I would love to find an ISA using it. Anyone?) charges only £1.50 per trade. In fact until 30/6 there is no charge at all. Combined with the zero stamp duty on ETFs this makes regular saving viable at lower levels than you might have thought

RichardBlundell 12 Jun 2008, 11:11am

Maybe this is a stupid question, but if someone invests in one of these funds, perhaps as an ISA, say to build up a pension pot, and then the company running it goes bust or has a crisis, do you:

(i) still "own" the underlying shares and are not really affected, apart from perhaps a little admin moving things over to a different company,

(ii) potentially lose everything except for some government-backed £35k guarantee like that for banks and savings, or

(iii) potentially lose everything?

This is very important because a pension pot should grow pretty huge (much more than £35k) if it is to last you for your entire retirement (health willing).

Who actually owns the underlying shares/investment in these tracker funds? What's to stop one of these companies "dipping into the fund" when it needs to raise money? I have some money invested in one of these, but I've never seen the share certificates of the 100-odd companies my money is supposed to be invested in...

Moshe55 12 Jun 2008, 11:41am

Cost, whilst important, shouldn't be the only consideration in my view.

What about tracking error and fund composition? Not all trackers are the same as some replicate the entire index and some sample the index. The latter can show more divergence from the index than charges alone can explain. The difference can be quite significant.

I would be interested to see a 'top 10' or bottom 10 of trackers ranked by tracking error!

technotime 12 Jun 2008, 12:06pm

I have had a Virgin Money UK tracker for about nine years and am sure it was one of the cheapest then. Any chance of providing the most expensive tracker list.

PurpleTrillian 12 Jun 2008, 1:14pm

To answer RichardBlundell's question, the answer is here:

http://www.fscs.org.uk/consumer/key_facts/limitations_of_the_scheme/compensation_limits/

Regards,
Penny

JasKing1 12 Jun 2008, 1:36pm

I'd like to echo Moshe55's comments regarding tracking error as this can significantly affect returns. It can also be a tricky number to find out.

Another useful column would be to indicate if dividends are reinvested. Ishares pay out dividends, whereas db xtrackers reinvest them. This is useful if you want to minimise uninvested cash in the account where the trackers are held.

Finally, I'd like to note that the Fidelity Moneybuilder holds over 20% in cash. I've never understood why this is but it seem to be a long term decision of the fund managers.

http://customer.morningstareurope.com/uk/fidelity/snapshot/snapshot.aspx?tab=3&Id=F0GBR04S1J&lang=en-GB&lastPageURL=&siteid=FDB

Thanks
Jason

teecee90 12 Jun 2008, 1:43pm

Selftrade also have a scheme similar to sharebuilder which also charges £1.50 for pre-planned trades and the fixed fee for an ISA is slightly cheaper than the Fools.

There is also a Lyxor all-share ETF which has a TER of 0.4%

urgetosplurge 12 Jun 2008, 2:06pm

Nice article, but it doesn't answer my key question of how Tracker funds (whether ETFs or investment trust) grow when the indices they're based on remain stagnant over a period of years (like the FTSE-100, for example).

If it's from dividends being reinvested, how does this work where a given index comprises low- or zero-dividend shares?

RichardBlundell 12 Jun 2008, 5:32pm

Thanks for your research, Penny. The summary seems to be as follows (summarised from the linked article):

--------------------

Compensation Limits

The maximum levels of compensation are:

+ Deposits: £35,000 (100% of the first £35,000)

+ Investments: £48,000 (100% of first £30,000, 90% of next £20,000)

+ Mortgage advice and arranging: £48,000 (100% of first £30,000, 90% of next £20,000)

+ Long-term insurance (e.g. pensions and life assurance): unlimited (100% of first £2,000, 90% of remainder)

+ General insurance: unlimited

- Compulsory insurance (e.g. third party motor): 100% of the claim.
- Non-compulsory insurance (e.g. home and general): 100% of first £2,000, 90% of remainder

+ General insurance advice and arranging: unlimited (100% of first £2,000, 90% of remainder

Compensation limits are per person (per firm and type of claim)

--------------------

This is a bit worrying, particularly for those who are using ISAs to save up a pension pot, because it seems to imply that as these are "investments" you'd only have £48k of the first £50 protected, and lose everything else! I had hoped that, in a sense, some of the underlying shares in FTSE companies would sort of belong to you if you invested in the fund.

Yikes!

So maybe it's best to open lots of small ISAs with many providers if you are saving them for a pension!

chad5k1 12 Jun 2008, 9:17pm

It is worrying.
As an aside, I'm in the same boat as Inig, and can't find equivalent tracker funds for India, China, Russia, South America or the Africa etc.
Suggestions anyone or experience from anyone?

gordonbanks42 12 Jun 2008, 10:40pm

In response to chad5k1 and Inig:
I don't know of any UT/AUT-style trackers for China, India, Russia, Sth America etc. (wish I did!), although Deutsche (db-xTracker), BGI (iShares) amd Lyxor do ETF-style trackers for that kind of thing. Look at:
http://www.ishares.eu/fund/overview.do
http://www.dbxtrackers.co.uk/EN/showpage.asp?pageid=29&stinvtyp=&stland=UK
http://www.lyxoretf.co.uk/index.php

The TERs tend to be higher than with trackers of UK indices. Also the composition of the indices they track can be very narrow, so you don't necessarily get as much diversification built in as you would for a FTSE 100 tracker let alone an All Share tracker.

Something else to bear in mind about costs that doesn't seem to have been mentioned so far is the buy/sell spread. The spread, if there is one, is effectively an exit charge. OEICs are single-priced so they have no spread. AUTs are (nearly) all dual-priced, so they have spreads. ETFs and ITs are shares so they have spreads too. The spreads vary a lot, so you have to do your homework. The longer you hold before selling, the less the spread affects your average annualised total return, of course.
In answer to urgetosplurge:
You would not expect a tracker to outperform the index it tracks significantly or consistently, unless you were comparing the total return from the tracker with the performance of the capital (rather than total return) version of the index being tracked. That would be an odd thing to do, but if you did, you'd expect to see a difference which would be equal to the index yield less the TER of the fund plus or minus the fund's actual tracking error.

RichardBlundell 13 Jun 2008, 4:44pm

I think it would be a great idea if a Motley Fool author could research the topic of investing, pensions and guarantees, and write up an article discussing these issues - the ownership of shares in funds/trusts/etc., the safeguards that are present, and giving best practice investment advice (even if that is to split up your pension pot into lots of small investments if you use ISAs)! I had previously thought of splitting up investments to spread the risk of owning individual shares, but it seems that we also need to spread our ISA pension pots to spread the risk due to low levels of government protection against failing investment companies.

It does seem unreasonable, however, that there is such a (relatively) small guarantee limit on these investments (compared to the size of a reasonable pension pot that the government is trying to encourage us to build up). If we are saving for a pension then it seems this might be another disadvantage of using ISAs.

sstudent 16 Jun 2008, 8:20am

I've had a Virgin Isa & stake holder pension for years now. The cost is 1% a year which is not what I would consider expensive. But also the customer service of Virgin is very good.

Silveraven 17 Jun 2008, 10:33pm

A number of years ago the Motley Fool wrote about how the FTSE 250 has consistently out-performed the 100. On the strength of this I started paying into HSBC's 250 tracker on a regular monthly basis. Okay, the 250 has wobbled more alarmingly than other UK Indexes since last summer, but overall I believe I saw a far better return than if I had stuck with just the L&G all-share tracker I had originally invested in. Another tracker that out-performed FTSE100 and all-share trackers is L&G's European tracker. Although listing the cheapest fees, etc., in this article was interesting I surprised that the 250 and European options weren't mentioned because the degree by which they out-performed the 100 and A/S up until last summer was quite considerable and certainly out-weighed any difference in fees. Things haven't been so great for the last year but is there any reason to suspect that they won't do the same again when/if the markets regain their confidence?
Admittedly I'm a novice at all this but I would suggest other newbies to cautiously check out 250 and European trackers rather than just sticking to FTSE100 and All-Share.

lynnm21 20 Jul 2008, 12:22am

I know it is like asking you to consult your crystal ball, but do you think now is a good time to invest some money (about 14K), which is currently in a high interest savings a/c in a L&G tracker? I am thinking half in ftse100 and half in global 100 tracker.

Silveraven 26 Jul 2008, 12:10am

Hi lynnm21,
I really wouldn't like to guess - everything seems so volatile at the moment! - but of course if this is the low point you'd do well to put in a lump sum now - but who really knows? Investing in South America and Russia over the last few years would have been brilliant, but nobody at the Fool let us into that little secret whilst it was going on! All I can advise is you check out the reasoning behind 'pound cost averaging' (investing a little but often) if you haven't already.
Good luck!

dab43 31 Jul 2008, 6:03pm

I have a F&C Investment Trust account which charges £60 + vat a year. Would i be better off investing my £8000 in one of these index trackers. I am behind with management charges, and running at a loss. Been like this for a while.

markob100 01 Aug 2008, 4:29pm

My idea is to drip an as-yet-undecided amount into a selection of trackers in the hope of getting decent diversification and benefiting from pound cost averaging.

On the equity side I quite like the Lyxor ETFs but - and this is a general ETF and tracker query - do these types of funds allow you to benefit from dividends in the underlying shares? I am conscious that some funds, as corporate entities in their own right, make dividend payments; but I haven't managed to track down any info which states that these dividends replicate the dividend flow (or at least value) from the fund's underlying holdings.

Alternatively, do dividends on the underlyings serve to boost the capital value of the fund (instead of being remitted as dividends on the fund)?

lynnm21 09 Aug 2008, 5:48pm

Hello Silveraven

thanks for your reply, I am going to invest £500 a month until my pot is gone. I think that's the best strategy. It seems to be about 50/50 on who thinks we're at the lowest point against having further to fall.

I wish us all luck!

Kitxp123 28 Oct 2008, 10:29am

I'm sorry to say that this article is a complete waste of time.
The trackers mentioned are NOT the 'ten top trackers' as the article heading suggests, they are simply the 'ten cheapest trackers'.
Obviously Stuart J Watson couldn't be bothered to do the research and find the actual top 10 performers.

Another poor article from the Fool.

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.