Skip Navigation
 

It Started With The Pigs...

David Stevenson

By

David Stevenson

From the Fool blog

Local Police Station Is Useless!

Published in Investing on 11 March 2008

Chinese inflation in February accelerated at its fastest in 11 years as the worst snowstorms in half a century disrupted food supplies. But why does that affect us?

The authorities had been blaming a porker shortage. Now it's the weather. But whatever the reason, China has the same problem as much of the rest of the world.

Consumer prices are going through the roof. Chinese inflation in February accelerated at its fastest in 11 years as the worst snowstorms in half a century disrupted food supplies.

The double whammy of the global economic slowdown and rising costs is making life very difficult for central banks.

Chinese consumer prices climbed 8.7% in February from a year earlier, the fastest pace since 1997, after gaining 7.1% in January, according to government statistics released today. Food prices, which make up around one-third of the consumer price index, surged 23% while non-food inflation rose 1.6%.

The authorities are blaming the weather, which did indeed turn nasty. The worst snowstorms for fifty years caused widespread transport disruption, as confirmed by TV pictures beamed round the world of families failing to get home for New Year.

As blizzards damaged crops, vegetable costs grew 46%, while pork prices boiled up 63% as supply shortages continued.

But the numbers have been steadily deteriorating for several months and turned out much higher than expected.

All of which should point to decisive near-term action by the authorities to steady the nerves of jangled consumers, for many of whom food costs constitute 50% of the household budget.

The government has already stated its aim of capping price gains at 4.8% for 2008. Today's official reaction emphasised the need to stay calm, whilst also admitting that it will be "more difficult to control full-year inflation" because of the storms.

So clearly, further interest rate increases are in the pipeline. China has already tried to curb price rises, with notable lack of success, by raising borrowing costs six times last year.

But though the key one-year lending rate is at a nine-year high of 7.47%, the deposit rate is a mere 4.14% and the benchmark 15-year bond yield stands at just 4.17%.

With double-digit growth overheating the economy, those levels are nowhere near high enough. Short-term rates need an immediate hike of at least 2%, even though overseas shipments only advanced 6.5% in February, the least in almost six years.

Further government intervention, like the recent instructions to food companies to seek approval prior to upping prices, could also be on the menu. Although longer term, that tends to be no more effective that putting a lid onto a boiling saucepan without turning down the heat.

Bank reserve requirements have already been ratcheted up to their highest-ever level to cool lending, and legislators meeting at this week's National People's Congress will need to take even tougher action to curb so-called ‘hot money' inflows.

Why is this important to us here in Britain?

Trouble is, it looks like China will be raising interest rates while the US Federal Reserve cuts as low as possible at the same time. That could create what economists love to call 'significant global imbalances.'

In other words, investors will shift even more assets to China to take advantage of higher returns. As a result, the dollar (and pound) will fall which will mean soaring commodity costs hit us even harder. 

Yet if Chinese inflation continues to accelerate unabated, we will end up importing it here. Big style. And we've got enough problems of our own on the prices front already.

But if China slams on the financial brakes, the world economy will be shunted a bit further into the buffers of recession.

For central banks, it's called Catch 22.

Share & subscribe

Comments

The opinions expressed here are those of the individual writers and are not representative of The Motley Fool. If you spot any comments that are unsuitable hit the flag to alert our moderators.

Terrapin1 11 Mar 2008, 3:02pm

And yet the profligacy of the US administration soldiers on. Shoving $200billion into the banks is going to do what precisely?
Start a major panic probably-this cannot go well.

figurewizard 11 Mar 2008, 4:22pm

A possible exodus of cash to China is the worst possible news for the UK. A sizeable chunk of the cash that offsets our appalling current account deficit; which amounts to our national cashflow, is in the 'carry trade'. This involves borrowing cash in low interest currencies and investing it in high interest ones. The pound has benifited from this in the past but this can only work in the absence of devaluation.

Now however with China's interest rates going up, her currency looking like having to revalue and her economy continuing to boom, where do you suppose the cash currently in London is going to go in the future? This could inevitably lead to higher interest rates to protect a falling pound later this year. In other words a full blown return to the 1970s.

stuartpetergraha 12 Mar 2008, 10:05am

Chinese food inflation or agflation is a serious problem and is pushing up inflation generally. Also commodity prices have virtually doubled. Therefore prices will have to go up at some point.
We don't need the US pump in money and hope, we need to slow and gradually tighten the money supply. This will keep the pound strong (and import cheaper) and the over borrowers will just have to learn. If we pump in money (lower interest rates) will they repay? NO, they will just borrow more and when we finally have to increase rates - falling pound, rising inflation - the pain will just be that much greater.
Even the Fool is saying is now the time to get a buy to let, I would say no and the article shows the need to be strong and at the least keep rates unchanged. Or we'll end up wioth stagflation. (As stated above).

Chongq 17 Mar 2008, 2:50pm

China's problem is low agricultural income. therefore food based inflation is excellent as a means of redistributing wealth. Same for other less developed countries.
Chongq

Chongq 17 Mar 2008, 2:53pm

One of China's problems is low agricultural income. Therefore food based inflation may be an excellent means of redistributing wealth. Same for many other countries with subsistence farmers.
Chongq

lowkey48 13 Apr 2008, 9:56pm

A question occurs to me; if more Chinese people are working in factories, laboratories, finance houses etc. etc. Then, could the food inflation be a simple supply and demand equation that is based on a simple cause?. Such as: are less people producing less food in China? Is China losing it's ability to feed itself? What global ripples would this cause?

Join the conversation

Instructions

Line breaks are converted automatically.

You may use the following tags in your post: <b>bold</b>, <i>quoted text</i>. All other tags will be removed from your post.

Hello stranger

To add your own comment, please login.

Not yet registered? Register now.