Why Shares Are Better Than Funds

Buying shares makes more sense than buying funds. Here’s why.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

With 2016 being one of the most volatile years so far for the stock market, many investors may be wondering whether it makes sense to buy funds rather than shares. After all, funds can offer significant amounts of diversification, which helps to reduce company-specific risk. This could help an investor’s portfolio to offer a more stable and robust return moving forward.

However, diversification can still be easily achieved through buying slices of companies instead of buying a fund. Certainly, a fund that owns hundreds of stocks may not be easily replicated, but the reality is that most of the benefits of diversification come from the first attempts to diversify. In other words, the marginal benefit of diversifying falls as more stocks are purchased, therefore it may not be necessary for investors to buy hundreds of stocks in order to reduce company-specific risk to an acceptable level.

All your eggs in one basket?

In any case, many funds focus on one specific region or one sector. For example, they may be US or UK-focused, or specialise in resources companies or consumer stocks. Similarly, they may have an income or capital growth tilt, or be focused on large caps or small caps. Therefore, there’s still the potential for volatile performance, since any one of those categories can perform much worse than the wider index in the short run.

For instance, in 2016 the resources sector has been hugely disappointing, so funds focused on that space have generally lost value. Similarly, China-focused funds have been relatively disappointing performers, while the uncertain prospects for the world economy have caused the valuations of riskier growth stocks to come under a degree of pressure. Therefore, buying a small number of funds may not reduce a portfolio’s risk by as much as is often perceived.

Low-cost solution

In addition, the costs of share ownership are generally much lower than buying units in a fund. This is especially the case with actively managed funds where performance fees can be steep and even wipe out any alpha generated by the manager of the fund. And while shares can be expensive to trade, aggregated orders are a sensible option for smaller investors and mean that purchases can be undertaken for as little as £2 per trade.

Of course, funds are often viewed as being less time-consuming than shares. For investors who have no desire to conduct any kind of research into a company then they’re often viewed as the perfect solution. While this is true to an extent, the reality is that funds must also be analysed before purchase since the performance of different funds can vary greatly. And with information on shares being easily accessible now thanks to the internet, obtaining the information needed to understand which shares have the best long-term potential has never been more straightforward.

So, while buying units in a fund can be a good idea for specialisation in a specific region or sector (for example in Chinese stocks or in the oil and gas industry), shares seem to offer the more compelling investment case. That’s not to say that funds aren’t worth holding, but rather that it may be sensible to devote the majority of capital within a portfolio to shares rather than funds.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Peter Stephens has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK owns shares of and has recommended Apple. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Mature couple at the beach
Investing Articles

6 stocks that Fools have been buying!

Our Foolish freelancers are putting their money where their mouths are and buying these stocks in recent weeks.

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

I was right about the Barclays share price! Here’s what I think happens next

Jon Smith explains why he still feels the Barclays share price is undervalued and flags up why updates on its…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Where I’d start investing £8,000 in April 2024

Writer Ben McPoland highlights two areas of the stock market that he would target if he were to start investing…

Read more »

View of Tower Bridge in Autumn
Investing Articles

Ahead of the ISA deadline, here are 3 FTSE 100 stocks I’d consider

Jon Smith notes down some FTSE 100 stocks in sectors ranging from property to retail that he thinks could offer…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

Why I think Rolls-Royce shares will pay a dividend in 2024

Stephen Wright thinks Rolls-Royce shares are about to pay a dividend again. But he isn’t convinced this is something investors…

Read more »

Investing Articles

1 of the best UK shares to consider buying in April

Higher gold prices and a falling share price have put this FTSE 250 stock on Stephen Wright's list of UK…

Read more »

Person holding magnifying glass over important document, reading the small print
Investing Articles

The market is wrong about this FTSE 250 stock. I’m buying it in April

Stephen Wright thinks investors should look past a 49% decline in earnings per share and consider investing in a FTSE…

Read more »

Black father and two young daughters dancing at home
Investing Articles

1 FTSE 250 stock I own, and 1 I’d love to buy

Our writer explains why she’s eyeing up this FTSE 250 growth phenomenon, and may buy more shares in this property…

Read more »