Turn £10k Into £18.5k With GlaxoSmithKline plc

Even during a troubled decade, GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) shares have performed reasonably.

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

When investing, your capital is at risk. The value of your investments can go down as well as up and you may get back less than you put in.

Read More

The content of this article is provided for information purposes only and is not intended to be, nor does it constitute, any form of personal advice. Investments in a currency other than sterling are exposed to currency exchange risk. Currency exchange rates are constantly changing, which may affect the value of the investment in sterling terms. You could lose money in sterling even if the stock price rises in the currency of origin. Stocks listed on overseas exchanges may be subject to additional dealing and exchange rate charges, and may have other tax implications, and may not provide the same, or any, regulatory protection as in the UK.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

gskI took a look recently at AstraZeneca, and was impressed to see an overall trebling in value over the past 10 years if all dividends were reinvested.

The FTSE 100‘s other big pharmaceuticals company, GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US) hasn’t been doing quite so well — for one thing, it hasn’t had its shares boosted by takeover fever.

A 20% gain?

If you’d invested £10,000 in GlaxoSmithKline shares 10 years ago, you’d have been paying around 1,191p apiece — and at that price you could have bagged 839 shares (ignoring dealing costs).

Now, the share price has only gained 21.5% over the period, and your ten grand would have grown to £12,149. While that might have matched cash in a savings account, we really expect better from investing in shares.

But that doesn’t include dividends, so what would those have added?

Rising dividends

GlaxoSmithKline has actually been paying pretty decent dividends, starting the period offering yields of around 3.5%. But that started ramping up in 2007 as the share price fell a little, reaching 5% by 2009 — and yields have remained close to that level since. 

One thing that does mean is that dividends alone would have easily been enough to beat cash sitting in the bank, without any share price gain!

Earnings per share (EPS) can be a little volatile, but even when EPS didn’t cover the dividend in 2010, Glaxo maintained the cash payment from its own resources — and EPS was back up to normal the next year.

Another five grand!

In total, GlaxoSmithKline would have paid you an extra £4,971 in dividends, taking your total to £17,120 — and a 71% rise is starting to look reasonable.

But what if, instead of taking and spending your cash handout each year, you had reinvested it in more Glaxo shares?

Before we look at that, let me mention a thing called pound cost averaging — it’s a fancy term that just means you’ll get more shares for the same money over a period when the price dips and recovers than if it had remained flat.

For Glaxo, what that means is that you’d have added just 24 new shares at the end of 2004 when the price was around 1,440p, but by 2007 when it had dropped to 1,210p you’d have scooped up 40 of them.

A decent result

Anyway, with dividends reinvested, you’d be ending the decade with £18,594 — and an 85.5% gain is really nothing to be sniffed at, especially for a share that has actually lagged the FTSE a little over the period (but with better than average dividend yields).

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Alan Oscroft has no position in any shares mentioned. The Motley Fool UK has recommended GlaxoSmithKline. We Fools don't all hold the same opinions, but we all believe that considering a diverse range of insights makes us better investors.

More on Investing Articles

Affectionate Asian senior mother and daughter using smartphone together at home, smiling joyfully
Investing Articles

How I’d invest my first £20k ISA to target £4,900 a year from dividend shares

Looking for dividend shares in a new Stocks and Shares ISA, and want diversification too? Here's how I'd go about…

Read more »

Passive income text with pin graph chart on business table
Investing Articles

Yields of up to 7%! I’d consider boosting my income with these FTSE dividend stocks

The London market has some decent-looking dividend stocks right now, and I’m tempted by these two for growing income streams.

Read more »

Young mixed-race couple sat on the beach looking out over the sea
Investing Articles

I’d put £20K in an ISA now to target a £1,900 monthly second income in future!

Christopher Ruane shares why he thinks a long-term approach to investing and careful selection of shares could help him build…

Read more »

Mature couple at the beach
Investing Articles

6 stocks that Fools have been buying!

Our Foolish freelancers are putting their money where their mouths are and buying these stocks in recent weeks.

Read more »

Black woman using loudspeaker to be heard
Investing Articles

I was right about the Barclays share price! Here’s what I think happens next

Jon Smith explains why he still feels the Barclays share price is undervalued and flags up why updates on its…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Where I’d start investing £8,000 in April 2024

Writer Ben McPoland highlights two areas of the stock market that he would target if he were to start investing…

Read more »

View of Tower Bridge in Autumn
Investing Articles

Ahead of the ISA deadline, here are 3 FTSE 100 stocks I’d consider

Jon Smith notes down some FTSE 100 stocks in sectors ranging from property to retail that he thinks could offer…

Read more »

Young female business analyst looking at a graph chart while working from home
Investing Articles

Why I think Rolls-Royce shares will pay a dividend in 2024

Stephen Wright thinks Rolls-Royce shares are about to pay a dividend again. But he isn’t convinced this is something investors…

Read more »