Should You Buy GlaxoSmithKline plc Or AstraZeneca plc?

After releasing disappointing results today, is GlaxoSmithKline plc (LON: GSK) still a better buy than AstraZeneca plc (LON: AZN)?

| More on:

The content of this article was relevant at the time of publishing. Circumstances change continuously and caution should therefore be exercised when relying upon any content contained within this article.

You’re reading a free article with opinions that may differ from The Motley Fool’s Premium Investing Services. Become a Motley Fool member today to get instant access to our top analyst recommendations, in-depth research, investing resources, and more. Learn More.

GlaxoSmithKlineIt’s been a disappointing year thus far for investors in GlaxoSmithKline (LSE: GSK) (NYSE: GSK.US), with shares in the pharmaceutical company being down 6%. This does not compare favourably to the wider market (the FTSE 100 is up 1%), nor to sector peer, AstraZeneca (LSE: AZN) (NYSE: AZN.US), which is up 23% having benefited from bid approaches from Pfizer.

A Challenging Quarter

Indeed, GlaxoSmithKline’s results released today showed that the company is struggling to come to terms with declining dales for its blockbuster inhaler, Advair. The removal of Advair from the reimbursement list of the US’s biggest prescription manager, Express Scripts, compounded falling sales for its omega 3 medicine, Lovaza, which is experiencing high levels of generic competition. The overall effect of this, as well as ongoing issues with regards to alleged bribery in China, has been a 4% reduction in revenue and a 12% fall in profit (after currency effects are removed).

A Different Story at AstraZeneca?

Meanwhile, sector peer AstraZeneca is also experiencing difficulties at present. Its patent cliff is in full-swing, with earnings for the full year expected to be 15% lower than last year, followed by a further 3% fall next year. This is in contrast to GlaxoSmithKline, which now expects flat earnings this year, with the market forecasting a rise of 9% next year.

However, investors are focused on the longer term for AstraZeneca, with the company’s strategy of acquisition in order to overcome its patent woes proving popular among investors. For GlaxoSmithKline, though, the focus is on a much shorter timeframe and the company’s enviable drugs pipeline is not the key motivator for investors right now when, in fact, it could be argued that it should be. That’s because it will be GlaxoSmithKline’s pipeline that will be the main driver of the company’s future growth.

Looking Ahead

Despite GlaxoSmithKline’s update being disappointing today, it continues to offer better growth prospects, a better valuation and a better yield than AstraZeneca. For instance, GlaxoSmithKline trades on a price to earnings (P/E) ratio of 13.5, while AstraZeneca’s P/E is 17.6. The two companies’ yields, meanwhile, are 5.4% (GlaxoSmithKline) and 3.8% (AstraZeneca), again highlighting that GlaxoSmithKline is the more attractive investment at the present time.

Certainly, the allegations regarding bribery in China are causing a certain amount of share price weakness, as are doubts regarding the loss of patent protection on key, blockbuster drugs. However, GlaxoSmithKline has a strong pipeline, growth potential, a top-notch yield and is trading at a significant discount to a key peer in AstraZeneca. As such, it appears to be a great buy at present with a bright long-term future ahead of it.

Should you invest, the value of your investment may rise or fall and your capital is at risk. Before investing, your individual circumstances should be assessed. Consider taking independent financial advice.

Peter Stephens owns shares of AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline. The Motley Fool recommends GlaxoSmithKline.

More on Investing Articles

Shot of a young Black woman doing some paperwork in a modern office
Investing Articles

With an 8% dividend yield, I think this undervalued FTSE stock is a no-brainer buy

With an impressive yield and good track record of payments, Mark David Hartley is considering adding this promising FTSE share…

Read more »

Passive income text with pin graph chart on business table
Investing Articles

£9,500 in savings? Here’s how I’d try to turn that into £1,809 a month of passive income

Investing a relatively small amount into high-yielding stocks and reinvesting the dividends paid can generate significant passive income over time.

Read more »

Businesswoman analyses profitability of working company with digital virtual screen
Investing Articles

Dividend star Legal & General’s share price is still marked down, so should I buy more?

Legal & General’s share price looks very undervalued against its peers. But it pays an 8%+ dividend yield, and has…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Dividend shares: 1 FTSE 100 stock to consider buying for chunky shareholder income

This company’s ‘clean’ dividend record looks attractive to me and I’d consider buying some of the shares to hold long…

Read more »

Investing Articles

3 of my top FTSE 250 stocks to consider buying before April

Buying undervalued UK shares can be a great way to generate long-term wealth. Here, Royston Wild reveals a handful on…

Read more »

Ice cube tray filled with ice cubes and three loose ice cubes against dark wood.
Investing Articles

Just released: our 3 top income-focused stocks to buy before April [PREMIUM PICKS]

Our goal here is to highlight some of our past recommendations that we think are of particular interest today, due…

Read more »

Investing Articles

Is this the best chance to buy cheap FTSE 100 shares in a generation?

I want to buy shares when they're cheap, and sell... never, just keep taking the dividends. And the FTSE 100…

Read more »

Man putting his card into an ATM machine while his son sits in a stroller beside him.
Investing Articles

Could NatWest shares be 2024’s number one buy for passive income?

For those of us looking to earn some long-term passive income, how does NatWest's 7% dividend yield sound? It sounds…

Read more »